arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · math/0103051

On Fermat's marginal note: a suggestion

Abstract

A suggestion is put forward regarding a partial proof of FLT(case1), which is elegant and simple enough to have caused Fermat's enthusiastic remark in the margin of his Bachet edition of Diophantus' "Arithmetica". It is based on an extension of Fermat's Small Theorem (FST) to mod p^k for any k>0, and the cubic roots of 1 mod p^k for primes p=1 mod 6. For this solution in residues the exponent p distributes over a sum, which blocks extension to equality for integers, providing a partial proof of FLT case1 for all p=1 mod 6. This simple solution begs the question why it was not found earlier. Some mathematical, historical and psychological reasons are presented. . . . . In a companion paper, on the triplet structure of Arithmetic mod p^k, this cubic root solution is extended to the general rootform of FLT (mod p^k) (case1), called "triplet". While the cubic root solution (a^3=1 mod p^k) involves one inverse pair: a+a^{-1} = -1 mod p^k, a triplet has three inverse pairs in a 3-loop: a+b^{-1} = b+c^{-1} = c+a^{-1} = -1 (mod p^k) where abc = 1 (mod p^k), which reduces to the cubic root form if a=b=c (\neq 1) mod p^k. The triplet structure is not restricted to p-th power residues (for some p \geq 59) but applies to all residues in the group G_k(.) of units in the semigroup of multiplication mod p^k.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

N. F. Benschop. 2001-03-07. On Fermat's marginal note: a suggestion. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0103051

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO