arXiv · hep-th/9403156
Reply to Hagen & Sudarshan's Comment
Abstract
We show that the argument in Phys Rev Lett 70 (1993) 1360 is correct and consistent, and that Hagen & Sudarshan's solution has inconsistency leading to non-vanishing commutators of $[P^1, P^2]$ and $[P^j, H]$ even in physical states. This proves that many of HS's statements in their Comment are based merely on incorrect guess, but not on careful algebra.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C. L. Ho, Y. Hosotani. 1994-03-25. Reply to Hagen & Sudarshan's Comment. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.74.1033
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.