arXiv · hep-th/0508006
Anthropic reasoning in multiverse cosmology and string theory
Abstract
Anthropic arguments in multiverse cosmology and string theory rely on the weak anthropic principle (WAP). We show that the principle, though ultimately a tautology, is nevertheless ambiguous. It can be reformulated in one of two unambiguous ways, which we refer to as WAP_1 and WAP_2. We show that WAP_2, the version most commonly used in anthropic reasoning, makes no physical predictions unless supplemented by a further assumption of "typicality", and we argue that this assumption is both misguided and unjustified. WAP_1, however, requires no such supplementation; it directly implies that any theory that assigns a non-zero probability to our universe predicts that we will observe our universe with probability one. We argue, therefore, that WAP_1 is preferable, and note that it has the benefit of avoiding the inductive overreach characteristic of much anthropic reasoning.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Steven Weinstein. 2006-06-08. Anthropic reasoning in multiverse cosmology and string theory. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381%2F23%2F12%2F017
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.