arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · hep-th/0303258

Problems on Foundations of General Relativity

Abstract

It was generally believed that, in general relativity, the fundamental laws of nature should be invariant or covariant under a general coordinate transformation. In general relativity, the equivalence principle tells us the existence of a local inertial coordinate system and the fundamental laws in the local inertial coordinate system which are the same as those in inertial reference system. Then, after a general coordinate transformation, the fundamental laws of nature in arbitrary coordinate system or in arbitrary curved space-time can be obtained. However, through a simple example, we find that, under a general coordinate transformation, basic physical equations in general relativity do not transform covariantly, especially they do not preserve their forms under the transformation from a local inertial coordinate system to a curved space-time. The origination of the violation of the general covariance is then studied, and a general theory on general coordinate transformations is developed. Because of the the existence of the non-homogeneous term, the fundamental laws of nature in arbitrary curved space-time can not be expressed by space-time metric, physical observable and their derivatives. In other words, basic physical equations obtained from the equivalence principle and the principle of general covariance are different from those in general relativity. Both the equivalence principle and the principle of general covariance can not be treated as foundations of general relativity. So, what are the foundations of General Relativity? Such kind of essential problems on General Relativity can be avoided in the physical picture of gravity. Quantum gauge theory of gravity, which is founded in the physics picture of gravity, does not have such kind of fundamental problems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ning Wu, Tu-Nan Ruan. 2003-03-30. Problems on Foundations of General Relativity. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0303258

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Gaillard-Zumino non-invertible symmetries

We uncover an infinite class of novel zero-form non-invertible symmetries in a broad family of four-dimensional models, studied years ago by Gaillard and Zumino (GZ), which includes several extended supergravities as particular subcases. The GZ models consist of abelian gauge fields coupled to a neutral sector, typically including a set of scalars, whose equations of motion are classically invariant under a continuous group $\mathscr{G}$ acting on the electric and magnetic field strengths via symplectic transformations. The standard lore holds that, at the quantum level, these symmetries are broken to an integral subgroup $\mathscr{G}_\mathbb{Z}$. We show that, in fact, a much larger subgroup $\mathscr{G}_\mathbb{Q}$ survives, albeit through non-invertible topological defects. We explicitly construct these defects and compute some of their fusion rules. As illustrative examples, we consider the axion-dilaton-Maxwell model and the bosonic sector of a class of $\mathcal{N}=2$ supergravities of the kind that appear in type II Calabi-Yau compactifications. Finally, we comment on how (part of) these non-invertible zero-form symmetries can be broken by gauging the $\mathscr{G}_\mathbb{Z}$ subgroup of invertible symmetries.

hep-th

On the resolution of categorical symmetries in (Non-) Unitary Rational CFTs

We explore several aspects of categorical symmetry-resolved entanglement entropy (SREE) directly within two-dimensional rational conformal field theory (RCFT) (without invoking any SymTFT construction arXiv:2409.02806). We derive a general formula applicable whenever the action of the relevant topological defect lines on the annulus Hilbert space is known. This framework accommodates weakly and strongly symmetric boundaries, cloaking states, and fusion rings with multiplicities. We verify the formula in a range of diagonal unitary and non-unitary examples, including theories with generalized Haagerup-Izumi modular data. Furthermore, we extend the analysis to non-diagonal RCFTs. The $\frac{1}{2}E_6$ example demonstrates that closed-channel modular data and NIM-rep multiplicities alone do not suffice to determine the defect action on the complete open-channel Hilbert space.

hep-th

Reflecting boundary conditions in critical loop models

In critical loop models, we call a boundary sticky if loops can attach to it, and reflecting otherwise. Using analytic bootstrap methods, we show that reflecting boundaries are characterised by one complex parameter, analogous to the boundary cosmological constant in Liouville theory. We determine disc 1-point functions, and write an explicit formula for disc 2-point functions as infinite combinations of conformal blocks. We also sketch the lattice interpretation of reflecting boundaries.

hep-th