arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · gr-qc/0504083

Comments on Space-Time

K. Ghosh
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

What happens to the entropy increase principle as the Universe evolve to form the big-crunch singularity? What happens to the uncertainity relations along the process of gravitational collapses? What is the quantum mechanical description of a Radon atom in a rigid box when the distance of consecutive nodes and antinodes of $ψ$ is equal to or less than the diameter of the atom? What is the position-space wave function of two finite volume massive bosons if we take contact interaction into account? How a photon produce electron-positron pair with finite volume concentrate rest masses? What are the charges of the electron-positron pairs forming loops in the vacuum? How two particles with three-momentums $k_1, k_2$ $(k_1 \neq k_2)$ produced to form a loop at a space-time point always arrive at another spacial point simultaneously? What is the microscopic explanation in terms of particle exchanges of the force in the Casimir effect? What is the mechanism of the collapse of the momentum-space wave function of a particle knocking out an elctron from an atom? What is meant by $|Ψ> = {c_1 (t)}|Ψ_{U^{238}}> + {c_2 (t)}|Ψ_{Th^{234}}> ~?$ Quantum mechanically the region between the rigid walls (which is equiprobable in classical mechanics) is non-homogeneous for a particle in a rigid box. A photon can not reproduce Maxwell's equations apart from moving with velocity $c$. How can a process involving only a few photons be described starting from the Maxwell's equations? The large scale structure of the Universe is homogeneous. What is the screen in our brains to view objects, as they are, of sizes larger than our brains?

Explore related subjects

gr-qc

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K. Ghosh. 2015-11-04. Comments on Space-Time. https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0504083

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

An upper bound on the minimum orbital period of black holes

Previous research has focused on establishing lower bounds on the minimum orbital period of black holes. In this work, we explore the complementary question of whether an upper bound exists for the minimum orbital period of black holes. We investigate the minimum orbital periods of three types of black holes: Schwarzschild, Reissner-Nordström and Kerr-Newman black holes. We find that the minimum orbital period of these black holes is bounded by an upper limit $T_{min} \leqslant 6\sqrt{3}πM$, where $M$ is the black hole mass. Our results suggest that this upper bound on the minimum orbital period may be a general property in black hole spacetimes.

gr-qc↗
arXiv2026

Dirac Observables for Gowdy Cosmologies regular at the Big Bang

Gowdy cosmologies are exact, spatially inhomogeneous solutions of the vacuum Einstein equations which describe nonlinear gravitational waves coalescing at the Big Bang singularity. With toroidal spatial sections they provenly have the Asymptotic Velocity Domination property, in that close to the Big Bang dynamical spatial gradients fade out and the dynamics is governed by a Carroll-type gravity theory. Here we construct an infinite set of Dirac observables for Gowdy cosmologies, valid off-shell, strongly, and without gauge fixing. These observables stay regular at the Big Bang and can be matched to much simpler Dirac observables of the Carroll-type gravity theory. Conversely, in an adapted foliation there is a systematic anti-Newtonian expansion (in inverse powers of the reduced Newton constant) of the full Dirac observables whose leading terms are the Carroll ones. In particular, this provides an off-shell generalization of the Asymptotic Velocity Domination property.

gr-qc↗
arXiv2026

Global causality constraints in rotating scalar-tensor spacetimes

Modified gravity is often formulated as an effective field theory (EFT), where higher-order corrections parametrize departures from General Relativity. We argue that such corrections should be constrained by the global causal structure of curved spacetime, in addition to the usual flat-space requirements such as positivity and unitarity. We propose that within the domain of validity of the EFT, the onset of closed timelike curves should not happen in a parametrically more accessible region than in the corresponding GR background. We test this diagnostic in the quadratic k-essence sector of scalar-tensor gravity. For stationary and axisymmetric spacetimes, the invariant test for closed axial orbits is the sign of the azimuthal component of the metric \(g_{φφ}\). We supplement this test by requiring a local time function in the space of Killing vectors. We apply these conditions to quadratic k-essence on Kerr--(A)dS backgrounds, with and without scalar charge. The zero-charge branch is exact Kerr--(A)dS, and we treat the charged branch perturbatively in scalar charge and in Hartle--Thorne slow rotation. Expanding for small spin \(χ=a/(GM)\ll1\), frame dragging begins at \(\mathcal O(χ)\), while the quadrupolar backreaction relevant for circular closed timelike curves enters at second order in both rotation and charge. We find that, in the truncation used here, any occurrence of \(g_{φφ}<0\) also lies outside EFT control. A higher-order calculation or a fully nonlinear treatment is therefore needed. Finally, we discuss how quasinormal modes and black-hole echoes could probe such causal structure.

gr-qc↗