arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · cs/0512034

Ensuring Trust in One Time Exchanges: Solving the QoS Problem

Bernardo A. Huberman·Fang Wu·Li Zhang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We describe a pricing structure for the provision of IT services that ensures trust without requiring repeated interactions between service providers and users. It does so by offering a pricing structure that elicits truthful reporting of quality of service (QoS) by providers while making them profitable. This mechanism also induces truth-telling on the part of users reserving the service.

Explore related subjects

cs.GTphysics.soc-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bernardo A. Huberman, Fang Wu, Li Zhang. 2005-12-08. Ensuring Trust in One Time Exchanges: Solving the QoS Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0512034

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Project Submission Games in Participatory Budgeting

We introduce the framework of project submission games, capturing the behavior of project proposers in participatory budgeting (and multiwinner elections). Here, each proposer submits a subset of project proposals, aiming at maximizing the total cost of those that get funded. We focus on finding conditions under which pure Nash equilibria (NE) exist in our games, and on the complexity of checking whether they exist. We also seek algorithms for computing best responses for the proposers

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Learning vs. Optimizing Bidders in Budgeted Auctions

The study of repeated interactions between a learner and a utility-maximizing optimizer has yielded deep insights into the manipulability of learning algorithms. However, existing literature primarily focuses on independent, unlinked rounds, largely ignoring the ubiquitous practical reality of budget constraints. In this paper, we study this interaction in repeated second-price auctions in a Bayesian setting between a learning agent and a strategic agent, both subject to strict budget constraints, showing that such cross-round constraints fundamentally alter the strategic landscape. First, we generalize the classic Stackelberg equilibrium to the Budgeted Stackelberg Equilibrium. We prove that an optimizer's optimal strategy in a budgeted setting requires time-multiplexing; for a $k$-dimensional budget constraint, the optimal strategy strictly decomposes into up to $k+1$ distinct phases, with each phase employing a possibly unique mixed strategy (the case of $k=0$ recovers the classic Stackelberg equilibrium where the optimizer repeatedly uses a single mixed strategy). Second, we address the intriguing question of non-manipulability. We prove that when the learner employs a standard Proportional controller (the "P" of the PID-controller) to pace their bids, the optimizer's utility is upper bounded by their objective value in the Budgeted Stackelberg Equilibrium baseline. By bounding the dynamics of the PID controller via a novel analysis, our results establish that this widely used control-theoretic heuristic is actually strategically robust.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Domination-Avoiding Learning Agents Cannot Collude

An influential paper of Calvano et al. empirically demonstrated that Q-learning agents spontaneously collude when placed as sellers that compete on prices in a natural market model. More recent results of Fish et al. empirically demonstrated that similar collusion happens with commercial LLMs. We formally prove that such collusion can also happen with external-regret-minimizing agents. We identify a very general class of agents, which we term Domination-Avoiding agents, that provably do not collude in such markets. This class contains all Mean-Based agents and all internal-regret-minimizing agents, as well as others such as Multiplicative-Weight agents with variable learning rate and contextual variants thereof. More generally we show that, in any game, this class of agents is guaranteed to jointly learn to almost never play strategies that are eliminated by repeated elimination of purely dominated strategies.

cs.GT↗