arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2611.07519

marp: Model-Averaged Inference for Parametric Renewal Processes in R

Veronica W. Tsou·Vanessa Huang·Jie Kang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Renewal processes model inter-event times between recurrent events using a parametric distribution, but selecting a single model can ignore model uncertainty and affect inference, particularly in small samples. This paper introduces marp, an R package for model-averaged inference in parametric renewal processes. The package fits six commonly used distributions, compares them using Akaike and Bayesian information criteria, and reports selected-model and model-averaged estimates of the mean inter-event time, event probability and hazard function, with percentile and Studentised bootstrap confidence intervals. A simulation study under three data-generating models showed that model averaging did not improve point estimation but often improved interval coverage relative to the AIC-selected model. Applications to seizure-recurrence and engineering failure-time data illustrate the proposed methods. The marp package provides a reproducible framework for inference that accounts for model uncertainty in parametric renewal processes.

Explore related subjects

stat.COstat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Veronica W. Tsou, Vanessa Huang, Jie Kang. 2026-11-05. marp: Model-Averaged Inference for Parametric Renewal Processes in R. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07519

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

A Computable Measure of Suboptimality for Entropy-Regularised Variational Objectives

Several methods in statistics and machine learning target a probability distribution for which an entropy-regularised variational objective is minimised. This increased flexibility introduces a computational challenge, as one loses access to an explicit unnormalised density for the target. To mitigate this difficulty, we introduce a novel measure of suboptimality called 'gradient discrepancy', and in particular a kernel gradient discrepancy (KGD) that can be explicitly computed. In the Bayesian statistics context, KGD coincides with the kernel Stein discrepancy (KSD), and we obtain a novel characterisation of KSD as measuring the size of a variational gradient. Outside this familiar setting, KGD enables novel sampling algorithms to be developed and compared, even when unnormalised densities cannot be obtained. To illustrate this point several novel algorithms are proposed and studied, including a natural generalisation of Stein variational gradient descent, with applications to mean-field neural networks and predictively oriented posteriors presented. On the theoretical side, our principal contribution is to establish sufficient conditions for desirable properties of KGD, such as continuity and convergence control.

stat.CO↗
arXiv2026

From Proxy to Certificate: Two-Sided Ollivier-Ricci Bounds from Balanced Forman Curvature

Balanced Forman (BF) curvature is used in graph learning as a cheap stand-in for Ollivier-Ricci (OR) curvature, yet it does not lower-bound OR curvature. We show that the BF value of an edge certifies a two-sided interval for its lazy OR curvature without solving any optimal transport problem, that BF coincides with a quadrangle-augmented Jost-Liu (JL) bound with its positive parts removed, and that when the 2-hop neighborhood is available, the interval can be sharpened at a cost of $\mathcal O(d_{\max}^{2.5})$ per edge. On 23 benchmark graphs, our quadrangle-augmented bound is tighter than the bounds of JL and Tian-Lubberts-Weber (TLW) on 13.8-100% of the edges and reduces their mean gap to the exact curvature by a median of 31.2%; intersected with the bounds of TLW, the intervals settle the curvature sign of more than half of the edges on 21 of the 23 graphs. On 15 real networks with up to 1,049,866 edges, a certify-then-solve procedure answers sign queries exactly while solving a median of 5.9 times fewer transport problems, for median speedups of 2$\times$ over exact evaluation, measured against a min-cut solver that is itself about two orders of magnitude faster than the widely used $\mathtt{GraphRicciCurvature}$. The main results are machine-checked in Lean 4.

stat.CO↗
arXiv2026

Theoretical guarantees for stochastic gradient sampling methods via Gaussian convolution inequalities

We derive first-order (in the stepsize) bounds on the bias in Wasserstein distances of the invariant measure of stochastic gradient kinetic Langevin dynamics with minimal assumptions on the stochastic gradient noise. These bounds sharpen existing non-asymptotic guarantees for stochastic-gradient MCMC methods and provide a quantitative resolution of a previously open problem on invariant measure accuracy. The main technical ingredients are new Gaussian convolution inequalities controlling the Wasserstein-$p$ distance between a Gaussian convolved with a mean-zero perturbation and the Gaussian itself. We anticipate that these inequalities will be of independent interest beyond the present application. To complement the theory, we illustrate the benefits of stochastic gradient sampling methods on a one-dimensional model, a Bayesian logistic regression example and a Bayesian random-effect model including comparison with pseudo-marginal MCMC methods.

stat.CO↗