arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.07516

Training-Independent Validation of a Learning-Based Controller for Stunt Maneuvers

Abstract

Learned controllers for vehicle maneuvers are usually validated under the conditions and objective used to train them, where they appear highly reliable, yet the parameters that change on real roads are often not those the model was trained on. We argue that validation must be independent of training: it should vary physical parameters that training kept fixed and use acceptance criteria absent from the training objective. A learning-based control policy, G-Maneuver, with 90.11% success is tested for stunt-level maneuvers. A looser terminal-heading score ranked the worst setting as the best. Because real stunt tests are safety-critical, a simulation-to-reality-to-simulation (Sim2Real2Sim) loop uses the simulation to select safe zones for real-vehicle trials with 16.9% acceptance. Automotive safety analysis frameworks are used to identify parameters for validation using coverage tests. We demonstrated that the kinematic stunt-driving indicators, namely heading change, sideslip, and speed-normalized yaw rate, match between simulation and the real world, while force and roll indicators do not, which identifies the indicators that can support safe deployment. A video of the experiments is available at https://youtu.be/dN1Oes8pNIo.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kiruthiga Chandra Shekar, Aliasghar Arab, Jingang Yi. 2026-11-05. Training-Independent Validation of a Learning-Based Controller for Stunt Maneuvers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07516

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

CubeDAgger: Interactive Imitation Learning for Dynamic Systems with Efficient yet Low-risk Interaction

Interactive imitation learning makes an agent's control policy robust by stepwise supervisions from an expert. The recent algorithms mostly employ expert-agent switching systems to reduce the expert's burden by limitedly selecting the supervision timing. However, this approach is useful only for static tasks; in dynamic tasks, timing discrepancies cause abrupt changes in actions, losing the robot's dynamic stability. This paper therefore proposes a novel method, named CubeDAgger, which improves robustness with less dynamic stability violations even for dynamic tasks. The proposed method is designed on a baseline, EnsembleDAgger, with three improvements. The first adds a regularization to explicitly activate the threshold for deciding the supervision timing. The second transforms the expert-agent switching system to an optimal consensus system of multiple action candidates. Third, autoregressive colored noise is injected to the agent's actions for time-consistent exploration. These improvements are verified by simulations, showing that the trained policies are sufficiently robust while maintaining dynamic stability during interaction. Finally, real-robot scooping experiments with a human expert demonstrate that the proposed method can learn robust policies from scratch based on just 30 minutes of interaction. https://youtu.be/kBl3SCTnVEM

cs.RO↗

EmboTeam: Asymmetric State Grounding for Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Collaboration

Heterogeneous multi-robot collaboration over long horizons requires both global task planning and robust coordination during execution. Existing plan- ners using large language models (LLMs) can generate task decompositions or symbolic plans, but often execute them as rigid action sequences, making them fragile to local state mismatches and synchronization failures. We propose Em- boTeam, a neuro-symbolic framework for asymmetric state grounding. An LLM generates structured state expectations, which are verified and coordinated through symbolic search using Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) and then grounded into a team-level parallel behavior tree. Robot-specific subtrees per- form precondition checking, skill execution, effect validation, local replanning, and blackboard-based synchronization. We further introduce MACE-THOR, con- taining 42 heterogeneous multi-robot tasks across 8 indoor layouts. EmboTeam improves task success rate from 12% to 55% and goal condition recall from 32% to 75% over LaMMA-P, demonstrating the effectiveness of synchronized reactive grounding for collaboration over long horizons.

cs.RO↗

WoVR: World Models as Reliable Simulators for Post-Training VLA Policies with RL

Reinforcement learning (RL) promises to unlock capabilities beyond imitation learning for Vision--Language--Action (VLA) models, but its requirement for massive real-world interaction prevents direct deployment on physical robots. Recent work attempts to use learned world models as simulators for policy optimization, yet closed-loop imagined rollouts inevitably suffer from hallucination and long-horizon error accumulation. Such errors not only degrade visual fidelity, but also mislead policy optimization by providing unreliable learning signals. We propose WoVR, a reliable world-model-based RL framework for post-training VLA policies. Instead of assuming a faithful world model, WoVR explicitly regulates how RL interacts with imperfect imagined dynamics. It improves rollout stability through a controllable action-conditioned video world model, reshapes imagined interaction to reduce effective error depth via Keyframe-Initialized Rollouts, and maintains policy--simulator alignment through World Model-Policy co-evolution. Extensive experiments demonstrate that WoVR enables stable long-horizon imagined rollouts and effective policy optimization, achieving superior LIBERO performance and consistent real-world gains across multiple robotic platforms. These results show that world models can serve as practical simulators for RL when hallucination is explicitly controlled. Additional visualization results are available at https://wovr-rlinf.github.io.

cs.RO↗