arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.07483

Signed but Not Safe: Requirement Integrity in Multi-Agent LLM Handoffs

Abstract

Enterprise AI agents increasingly split a user's request across subagents and merge their results, and each handoff can summarize away, alter or ignore a requirement. We report a preregistered study with synthetic, exactly scorable tasks comparing free-text, structured JSON and signed requirement-manifest handoffs: the orchestrator extracts each requirement as a verbatim quote plus a checkable predicate, code signs the manifest with HMAC-SHA256, and deterministic code verifies the merger's decision. With Qwen3-8B (1,440 trajectories, five threats), signed manifests cut unsafe commits under attack from 69.4% to 9.0% (60.4 pp, 95% CI [51.4, 69.4]) with no net loss of conformant commits relative to structured handoffs. Signing is what defeats in-transit tampering: an unsigned manifest committed violations in 79% of mutated runs, the signed one in none. On identical trajectories the deterministic verifier caught 78.7% of violating decisions versus 59.0% for an LLM checker, with 7% versus 50% false alarms. An oracle manifest removed all remaining unsafe commits: the residual risk comes from extraction errors made before signing. A preregistered pre-signing injection attack confirmed this boundary: one adversarial line raised signed-manifest violations from 14.6% to 37.5% (Qwen3-8B), 11.1% to 63.9% (gpt-oss-20b) and 8.3% to 75.0% (GPT-5.6-luna), and the signature then authenticated the corrupted manifest. Signing protects requirements in transit, not at extraction; the extraction step is the trust boundary.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xiaobo Chen, Genliang Zhu, Ziyuan Wang, Chu Wang. 2026-11-05. Signed but Not Safe: Requirement Integrity in Multi-Agent LLM Handoffs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07483

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

How to Backdoor Image Knowledge Distillation

Knowledge distillation is widely used to transfer behavior from a large teacher model to a smaller student. It is often assumed to be safe when the teacher is clean, because classic backdoor attacks rely on poisoned labels and triggers in supervised training, whereas distillation trains the student to match a teacher's outputs. We show that this assumption can fail when the distillation dataset itself is poisoned. Our attack injects triggered and manipulated images that a clean teacher already predicts as an attacker chosen target label, which causes the student to learn a backdoor even though the teacher remains unaffected. We evaluate this threat across multiple manipulation strategies, including targeted adversarial perturbations and targeted GAN based class transitions, and study how distillation settings influence both accuracy and attack success. We show that the attack remains effective even at a 10% poisoning rates. The results demonstrate that a clean teacher alone is not a sufficient safeguard: poisoned distillation data can produce a strongly backdoored student while maintaining competitive performance on clean images. These findings show that the integrity and provenance of distillation data are part of the security boundary of data intensive KD pipelines, even when the teacher itself is trusted.

cs.CR↗

Cryptanalysis of Isogeny-Based Quantum Money with Rational Points

Quantum money is a representative application in cryptography that utilizes quantum technology to achieve security that is unattainable with classical systems. Since the theoretical proposal by Wiesner in 1983, the most recent instantiation is the quantum money using class group actions on elliptic curves, proposed by Montgomery and Sharif in Asiacrypt'24. In this work, we propose a concrete cryptanalysis by leveraging the efficiency of evaluating division polynomials with the coordinates of rational points, offering a speedup of $O(\log^4p)$ compared to the brute-force attack. While the resulting attack still runs in exponential time, our method provides the first nontrivial algorithmic insight into their structural hardness. Furthermore, due to the algebraic properties of rational points and quadratic twists, our technique naturally yields a more efficient verification procedure for the underlying quantum money. We believe this new line of analysis opens promising directions for future research in elliptic-curve-based quantum cryptography.

cs.CR↗

Federated Learning in the Wild: A Comparative Study for Cybersecurity under Non-IID and Unbalanced Settings

Machine Learning (ML) techniques have shown strong potential for network traffic analysis; however, their effectiveness depends on access to representative, up-to-date datasets, which is limited in cybersecurity due to privacy and data-sharing restrictions. To address this challenge, Federated Learning (FL) has recently emerged as a novel paradigm that enables collaborative training of ML models across multiple clients while ensuring that sensitive data remains local. Nevertheless, Federated Averaging (FedAvg), the canonical FL algorithm, has shown poor convergence in heterogeneous environments characterised by non-independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) data distributions and unbalanced dataset sizes across clients, conditions frequently observed in cybersecurity contexts. To overcome these challenges, several alternative FL algorithms have been developed, yet their applicability to network intrusion detection remains insufficiently explored. This study systematically evaluates a range of FL algorithms in the context of network intrusion detection for DDoS attacks. Using a dataset of recent network attacks, the evaluation considers detection performance, training time, and communication overhead under non-i.i.d. settings, providing practical insights into the selection of FL solutions for network intrusion detection.

cs.CR↗