arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.07429

Connected graphs having maximum signless Laplacian spectral radius

Abstract

Let $ρ(G)$ denote the signless Laplacian spectral radius of a graph $G$, and let $\mathcal C_{n,m}$ be the family of connected graphs of order $n$ and size $m$. A graph is $Q$-maximal if it maximizes $ρ(G)$ over this family. Motivated by a question of Chang and Tam (2011), we study this extremal problem using scalar identities and coronal methods for threshold graphs. From the Perron equations, we derive the identity $S_G(λ)=T_{a,b}(λ)$ at $λ=ρ(G)$, where $a$ and $b$ are the total numbers of zero-vertices and one-vertices. This yields a one-point comparison principle: for a connected threshold graph $H$ with the same block totals, $S_H(z)>T_{a,b}(z)$ at some $z\ge n$ implies $ρ(H)>z$, allowing spectral comparison without estimating individual Perron coordinates. We prove that every $Q$-maximal threshold graph has character at most three, so its vertex-sequence contains at most three zero--one block pairs. We also show that the quasi-star graph is $Q$-maximal whenever $n\ge5$ and $n-1\le m<(n^2+10n-8)/8$. For certain dense parameter pairs, we construct connected threshold graphs with signless Laplacian spectral radii strictly larger than those of both the quasi-star and the connected quasi-complete graph. Thus the corresponding two-candidate assertion for connected graphs fails in general.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Di-Jian Wang, Hong-Yan Ge, Shi-Cai Gong, Bo-Jun Yuan. 2026-11-05. Connected graphs having maximum signless Laplacian spectral radius. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07429

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Domination in Johnson graphs J(n, 3) for odd n

In 2025 Cornet, Dravec, and Torres determined the domination number $γ(J(n,3))$ of the Johnson graph for every even $n \ge 6$, expressing it as a closed form $ϕ_n$ in terms of Fort-Hedlund covering numbers, and conjectured the same value for odd $n$. We prove this conjecture: $γ(J(n,3)) = ϕ_n$ for every odd $n \ge 7$. A dominating set of $J(n,3)$ is the same as a lotto design $\mathrm{LD}(n,3,3,2)$, and the lotto numbers $L(n,3,3,2)$, and hence $γ(J(n,3))$, were already determined for every $n$ by Bate (1978) and by Brouwer (1981); a short degree argument of Füredi, Székely, and Zubor (1996) gives the same lower bound for all $n \not\equiv 9, 10 \pmod{12}$. The contribution of this paper is therefore a new proof of the odd case, carried out within the bijective framework of Cornet, Dravec, and Torres.

math.CO↗

HJ numbers revisited

Hales-Jewett theorem is well known. We prove a primitive recursive bound, in fact an $\clE^5$ one, for the density version. In preparation we deal with what was the main induction step in the old proof of Hales-Jewett as a result in its own right with better bounds. Also in improving our bounds.

math.CO↗

Adjacency-degree algebras and spectral determination of graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with adjacency matrix $A$ and degree matrix $D$. Applying $A$ and $D$ repeatedly to the all-ones vector produces a space $M_G$ of functions on the vertices, and these functions are constant on the orbits of the automorphism group. We call $G$ AD-observable if $M_G$ contains the indicator vector of every orbit, and AD-separable if the functions in $M_G$ separate the orbits. Forests are AD-observable, by McKay's leaf-pruning argument. Our main result is that for every cograph, $M_G$ is spanned by the indicator vectors of the cells of the stable partition of color refinement. Hence a cograph is AD-observable, or equivalently AD-separable, exactly when color refinement finds its orbits, and we describe these cographs by their cotrees. We also show that two cographs with the same number of vertices and the same homomorphism counts from all caterpillars have the same counts from all trees. The main result does not extend to distance-hereditary graphs: we give two such graphs on nine vertices that are AD-separable but not AD-observable.

math.CO↗