arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.07118

Perfect Partitions of Regular Bipartite Graphs

Abstract

Let $I_{n,n}$ be a fixed perfect matching of the complete bipartite graph $K_{n,n}$, and let $L_{n,1}=K_{n,n}-I_{n,n}$. A perfect set of $L_{n,1}$ is a $1$-factorization of $L_{n,1}$, that is, a set of $n-1$ pairwise edge-disjoint perfect matchings whose union is $E(L_{n,1})$; a perfect partition of $L_{n,1}$ is a partition of the set of all perfect matchings of $L_{n,1}$ into perfect sets. Brualdi, Chiang, and Li (2005) asked whether $L_{n,1}$ admits a perfect partition. Identifying both sides of the bipartition with $[n]=\{1,2,\ldots ,n\}$, the perfect matchings of $L_{n,1}$ are exactly the derangements of $[n]$, the perfect sets correspond bijectively to the reduced Latin squares of order $n$, and the perfect partitions are exactly the perfect matchings of the $(n-1)$-uniform hypergraph whose vertices are the derangements of $[n]$ and whose edges are the perfect sets. We first give, for every $n$, a constructive lower bound on the maximum number of pairwise disjoint perfect sets of $L_{n,1}$. We then show that $L_{5,1}$ has exactly $42$ distinct perfect partitions and that $L_{6,1}$ has at least $82$ distinct perfect partitions; these are the first examples demonstrating that perfect partitions need not be unique. Finally, we exhibit two distinct perfect partitions of $L_{7,1}$, resolving the $n=7$ open problem raised by Brualdi et al.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Melanie J. Ferreri, Archana L. Parameswaran, Gexin Yu. 2026-11-04. Perfect Partitions of Regular Bipartite Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07118

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Domination in Johnson graphs J(n, 3) for odd n

In 2025 Cornet, Dravec, and Torres determined the domination number $γ(J(n,3))$ of the Johnson graph for every even $n \ge 6$, expressing it as a closed form $ϕ_n$ in terms of Fort-Hedlund covering numbers, and conjectured the same value for odd $n$. We prove this conjecture: $γ(J(n,3)) = ϕ_n$ for every odd $n \ge 7$. A dominating set of $J(n,3)$ is the same as a lotto design $\mathrm{LD}(n,3,3,2)$, and the lotto numbers $L(n,3,3,2)$, and hence $γ(J(n,3))$, were already determined for every $n$ by Bate (1978) and by Brouwer (1981); a short degree argument of Füredi, Székely, and Zubor (1996) gives the same lower bound for all $n \not\equiv 9, 10 \pmod{12}$. The contribution of this paper is therefore a new proof of the odd case, carried out within the bijective framework of Cornet, Dravec, and Torres.

math.CO↗

HJ numbers revisited

Hales-Jewett theorem is well known. We prove a primitive recursive bound, in fact an $\clE^5$ one, for the density version. In preparation we deal with what was the main induction step in the old proof of Hales-Jewett as a result in its own right with better bounds. Also in improving our bounds.

math.CO↗

Adjacency-degree algebras and spectral determination of graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with adjacency matrix $A$ and degree matrix $D$. Applying $A$ and $D$ repeatedly to the all-ones vector produces a space $M_G$ of functions on the vertices, and these functions are constant on the orbits of the automorphism group. We call $G$ AD-observable if $M_G$ contains the indicator vector of every orbit, and AD-separable if the functions in $M_G$ separate the orbits. Forests are AD-observable, by McKay's leaf-pruning argument. Our main result is that for every cograph, $M_G$ is spanned by the indicator vectors of the cells of the stable partition of color refinement. Hence a cograph is AD-observable, or equivalently AD-separable, exactly when color refinement finds its orbits, and we describe these cographs by their cotrees. We also show that two cographs with the same number of vertices and the same homomorphism counts from all caterpillars have the same counts from all trees. The main result does not extend to distance-hereditary graphs: we give two such graphs on nine vertices that are AD-separable but not AD-observable.

math.CO↗