arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.07110

Credibility Clustering for Experience Rating: An Automated Approach to Risk Group Allocation in Group Life Insurance

Abstract

In insurance, experience rating plays a crucial role in mitigating adverse selection by adjusting premiums according to historical claims experience. A key step in this process is the classification of insured collectives into homogeneous risk groups. Within group life insurance, this classification traditionally relies on manual decisions and arbitrary thresholds, which may lead to inefficiencies and inconsistent outcomes. This paper proposes a data-driven methodology for automating risk group allocation based on a combination of the multidimensional Bühlmann-Straub model and k-means clustering -- referred to as credibility clustering. By incorporating credibility weights, the method accounts for the varying statistical significance of experience data and ensuresthat risk classifications are both actuarially sound and practically implementable. Empirical results based on real-world group life insurance data from a major European insurer demonstrate that the proposed framework outperforms the two k-means benchmark variants considered in the empirical application in terms of viability, temporal stability and accounting for statistical reliability.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Thom van Rijn, Frank Weber, Michael Merz. 2026-11-04. Credibility Clustering for Experience Rating: An Automated Approach to Risk Group Allocation in Group Life Insurance. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07110

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Proxy-Reliance Control in Conformal Recalibration of One-Sided Value-at-Risk

We introduce a proxy-reliance-controlled conformal recalibration framework for one-sided Value-at-Risk (VaR), and study a question that existing state-aware methods do not usually isolate: how strongly should the recalibration adjustment depend on an imperfect volatility proxy? We formalize this through a proxy-reliance parameter that continuously interpolates between an approximately constant-shift correction and a fully proxy-scaled correction. This makes proxy reliance a distinct and practically interpretable design choice in one-sided VaR recalibration. We show theoretically that larger proxy reliance increases the responsiveness of the tail adjustment to proxy scale, but also increases stressed-state fragility when the proxy underreacts. Empirically, in rolling out-of-sample tests on a six-ETF panel with VIX-linked state variables, and with supporting evidence from SPY, we find that the empirical value of proxy-reliance control lies in improved stressed-state robustness rather than uniform overall dominance. In particular, when the baseline forecast remains exposed to proxy imperfection in stressed states, lower or intermediate proxy reliance can outperform fully proxy-scaled recalibration in stressed left-tail VaR control.

q-fin.RM↗

Dynamic star-shaped risk measures and $g$-expectations

Motivated by static monetary and star-shaped risk measures, this paper investigates representation theorems within a dynamic framework. We show that dynamic monetary risk measures can be represented as the lower envelope of a family of dynamic convex risk measures, and normalized dynamic star-shaped risk measures can be represented as that of a family of normalized dynamic convex risk measures. Furthermore, we establish the intrinsic link between dynamic monetary risk measures and dynamic star-shaped risk measures. Moreover, we examine the associated sensitivity and time consistency issues for such risk measures. Finally, we characterize star-shapedness of risk measures induced by bounded quadratic BSDE solutions and illustrate normalized time-consistent examples through $g$-expectations.

q-fin.RM↗

Robust distortion riskmetrics over Bregman--Wasserstein balls and their intersections

We study the worst-case values of distortion riskmetrics over Bregman--Wasserstein balls around a reference distribution. Unlike the squared $2$-Wasserstein distance, Bregman--Wasserstein divergences can penalize upward and downward deviations differently. Our main result applies to generalized distortion functions $g:[0,1]\to\R$ of bounded variation, with $g(0)=0$ and suitable endpoint regularity, which need not be monotone, normalized, or upper semicontinuous. For strictly convex generators satisfying a two-sided $p$-growth condition, we obtain a one-dimensional dual representation of the worst-case value. When a positive Lagrange multiplier makes the divergence constraint binding, we identify a unique quantile function through a least concave majorant and characterize when it attains the supremum. For absolutely continuous generalized distortion functions, we characterize the solution through an isotonic projection; we also study more general generators and shape constraints, including unimodality. Finally, we extend the analysis to intersections of Bregman--Wasserstein balls, describing models acceptable to several parties involved in decision making, and illustrate the results numerically.

q-fin.RM↗