arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.06470

How many sorted projections determine n points in k dimensions?

Abstract

Let $d_1,\dots,d_m$ be directions in $\mathbb{R}^k$, where $k\ge 2$. A multiset $X$ of $n$ points of $\mathbb{R}^k$ projects to the $m$ multisets of numbers $\{\{x\cdot d_j : x\in X\}\}$, or equivalently to the $m$ sorted lists of these numbers. How many directions are needed for these projections to determine every multiset of $n$ points? Two simple bounds are known in every dimension: more than $(k-1)\log_2 n$ directions are always needed, and $(k-1)n+1$ directions in general position always suffice. In the plane much more is known: Matousek, Privetivy and Skovron showed that almost every choice of $O(\log n \log\log n)$ directions suffices. Whether anything similar holds in higher dimensions was left open by Dym, Wellershoff, Tsoukanis, Levy and Balan. We observe that two lemmas of Hair and Sahai, proved for list recovery of random linear codes, answer that question, and by tightening their argument we show that in every dimension almost every choice of $(4k-2)\ln(2n)\ln(k\log_2 2n)+k+1$ directions suffices. For $k\le 10$ this beats the linear bound once $n$ is larger than about 100: for example, 144 directions suffice for multisets of 1000 points in the plane, and an exact computation lowers this to 133. Letting some of the random blocks in their argument fail removes a factor $\log k$: almost every choice of $O(k\log n\log\log n)$ directions suffices, uniformly in $k$ and $n$. We also show that $2k-1$ directions never determine three points, so that the logarithmic lower bound is not tight; that every $m$ directions in the plane fail on some pair of multisets of size $O(1.78^m)$, improving the bound $O(1.80^m)$ of Matousek, Privetivy and Skovron; and that for each $k$, $m$ and $n$, either almost every choice of $m$ directions works or almost none does.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Christopher Gorham Lester, Raymond Hau Sørensen. 2026-11-04. How many sorted projections determine n points in k dimensions?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06470

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Domination in Johnson graphs J(n, 3) for odd n

In 2025 Cornet, Dravec, and Torres determined the domination number $γ(J(n,3))$ of the Johnson graph for every even $n \ge 6$, expressing it as a closed form $ϕ_n$ in terms of Fort-Hedlund covering numbers, and conjectured the same value for odd $n$. We prove this conjecture: $γ(J(n,3)) = ϕ_n$ for every odd $n \ge 7$. A dominating set of $J(n,3)$ is the same as a lotto design $\mathrm{LD}(n,3,3,2)$, and the lotto numbers $L(n,3,3,2)$, and hence $γ(J(n,3))$, were already determined for every $n$ by Bate (1978) and by Brouwer (1981); a short degree argument of Füredi, Székely, and Zubor (1996) gives the same lower bound for all $n \not\equiv 9, 10 \pmod{12}$. The contribution of this paper is therefore a new proof of the odd case, carried out within the bijective framework of Cornet, Dravec, and Torres.

math.CO↗

HJ numbers revisited

Hales-Jewett theorem is well known. We prove a primitive recursive bound, in fact an $\clE^5$ one, for the density version. In preparation we deal with what was the main induction step in the old proof of Hales-Jewett as a result in its own right with better bounds. Also in improving our bounds.

math.CO↗

Adjacency-degree algebras and spectral determination of graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with adjacency matrix $A$ and degree matrix $D$. Applying $A$ and $D$ repeatedly to the all-ones vector produces a space $M_G$ of functions on the vertices, and these functions are constant on the orbits of the automorphism group. We call $G$ AD-observable if $M_G$ contains the indicator vector of every orbit, and AD-separable if the functions in $M_G$ separate the orbits. Forests are AD-observable, by McKay's leaf-pruning argument. Our main result is that for every cograph, $M_G$ is spanned by the indicator vectors of the cells of the stable partition of color refinement. Hence a cograph is AD-observable, or equivalently AD-separable, exactly when color refinement finds its orbits, and we describe these cographs by their cotrees. We also show that two cographs with the same number of vertices and the same homomorphism counts from all caterpillars have the same counts from all trees. The main result does not extend to distance-hereditary graphs: we give two such graphs on nine vertices that are AD-separable but not AD-observable.

math.CO↗