arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2611.06456

Phase matching and mode coupling in photonic-crystal ring resonators

Alexander E. Ulanov·Lukas Bengel·Tobias Herr
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Photonic-crystal ring resonators, in which periodic refractive-index modulations couple counter-propagating modes, have become a widely used platform for nonlinear photonics, offering mode-by-mode dispersion engineering. When several modulation components are superimposed, their relative angular alignment (phase) is an additional degree of freedom whose impact on the nonlinear dynamics has remained unclear. Here we show that the relative phases between the modulation patterns have a decisive impact. Through the interference of the nonlinear processes in forward and backward direction, they add a phase and mode selection rule to the established phase-matching conditions, which can fully suppress nonlinear coupling. They also impose a relative spectral chirp between forward- and backward-propagating waveforms. We illustrate these effects for parametric oscillation and dissipative Kerr solitons. Our results extend the concept of phase matching to resonators with interfering nonlinear pathways and establish the alignment of index gratings as a design dimension for nonlinear microresonators.

Explore related subjects

physics.optics

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alexander E. Ulanov, Lukas Bengel, Tobias Herr. 2026-11-04. Phase matching and mode coupling in photonic-crystal ring resonators. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06456

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Nonperturbative regime of low-order harmonic generation in intense low-frequency laser field

We find the atomic response to the intense femtosecond laser pulse via solving numerically the three-dimensional non-stationary Schrödinger equation (TDSE) for a model atom and calculating its dipole moment. For weak quasi-static fields, the response is well described by a perturbation approach, but for intensities higher than about $0.6 \, \, 10^{14}$ W/cm$^2$ the accuracy of this description is unsatisfactory, regardless of the order of non-linearity taken into account. We suggest fitting the numerical TDSE solution results with a Padé expansion, and show that this approximation describes the response well both in the perturbative regime and beyond it for intensities approximately up to $1.4 \, \, 10^{14}$ W/cm$^2$. To consider the non-perturbative nonlinearity beyond the quasi-static limit we use the model of nonlinear oscillator with the restoring force defined by the found Padé expression. Our model fails to predict the behaviour of the nonlinear refractive index in the nonperturbative domain, but it describes well the nonperturbative growth of the efficiency with the laser intensity for other nonlinear optical processes, namely, the third and fifth harmonic generation in the IR field and the optical rectification in a two-color field.

physics.optics↗
arXiv2026

Digitally enhanced Multi-wavelength Stabilization using a Passive Fiber Frequency Reference

High-stability frequency stabilization between lasers is essential for applications such as precision metrology, frequency dissemination, and quantum communications. We demonstrate the use of code-based multiplexing of a passive fiber-based interferometer for frequency stabilization and transfer between lasers separated by 85 GHz in frequency using a single shared passive reference. Out-of-loop characterization places an upper bound of sub-kHz/$\sqrt{\text{Hz}}$ on the transferred frequency noise at Fourier frequencies above 40 mHz, with a differential fractional stability of $7\times10^{-13}$ at 1 second. We also demonstrate continuous laser tunability and characterize the residual length noise coupling. Finally, we provide a framework for scaling the architecture to higher laser counts, offering a pathway to scalable, frequency agile stabilization of multiple light sources without the overhead of an optical frequency comb.

physics.optics↗
arXiv2026

Optical Coherent Combining in Multi-Aperture Free-Space Receivers through Atmospheric Turbulence via Optically Computed Alignment Gradients

Multi-aperture reception yields a coherent-combining gain only if the aperture fields are aligned in phase and polarization, which in a downlink must track the atmosphere. We show that the exact gradients of the combined power with respect to the phase and polarization angle of each branch can be measured optically, before photodetection: a passive tap of the combined field, split one-to-$N$, is the common self-reference and, interfered with a branch tap on a 3 dB coupler, yields the phase gradient; with a $90^\circ$ Faraday rotator and a static $π/2$ offset it yields the polarization gradient. Each branch then runs fixed-gain phase and polarization loops, without division, perturbation, dither, reference laser, or per-branch receiver, as analog integrators or a low-rate processor. We derive the gradients, their optical readout, and the loop stability condition. A phase-only simulation with identical disturbances, a common 100 MS/s clock, and retuning of every scheme compares the loop with centralized and distributed stochastic parallel gradient descent and with dither locking at the OSNR where ideal four-beam combining reaches the 28 GBd DP-QPSK FEC threshold. Up to $10^5$ rad/s of multi-tone disturbance the loop keeps the lowest residual loss, at most $5.6\times10^{-4}$ dB for four beams and 13 to 160 times below the alternatives, and reaches $90\%$ efficiency in 0.6 $μ$s for up to 64 beams. The taps leave the receiver OSNR unchanged and every retuned scheme stays within 0.06 dB of ideal combining, whereas brief dither misalignments cost 0.14 dB. Up to $10^7$ rad/s it preserves the ideal-combining bit-error ratio for four, sixteen, and sixty-four beams while every baseline crosses the threshold and slips carrier recovery. In fades it loses $4\times10^{-3}$ dB where the others lose 0.2 to 0.9 dB. Assumptions and limitations are stated; experimental validation remains open.

physics.optics↗