Beyond Infraction Scores: Failure-Boundary Profiles for Closed-Loop Evaluation of Driving and Robot Navigation Agents

Milan Bulat; Gino Ardelean; Ellington Kirby

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2611.06453

Beyond Infraction Scores: Failure-Boundary Profiles for Closed-Loop Evaluation of Driving and Robot Navigation Agents

Milan Bulat·Gino Ardelean·Ellington Kirby

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Closed-loop driving benchmarks in CARLA rank agents by a driving score that multiplies route completion by an infraction penalty. This score does not distinguish an agent that stops in front of an obstacle from one that pushes past it. In a corridor closed by two parked cars, for example, one agent that drives through with contact averages 52.2 on the blocked widths, while the agents that stop average between 37.8 and 40.6. We propose failure-boundary profiles, an evaluation in which each scenario family varies one measured factor, such as corridor width or the time gap in oncoming traffic, and each variant is certified from measurement as one where the agent should proceed or one where it should stop. Along this axis we estimate two curves per agent, commitment (the probability of attempting the passage) and competence (the probability of passing without contact), and locate where each crosses one half, with intervals that account for the simulator's run-to-run variance. The certified labels also give a summary metric, decision accuracy, which credits clean passes on passable variants and stops on blocked ones. We evaluate seven driving agents on seven CARLA families. The rule-based expert reaches a decision accuracy of 0.74 and TFv6, the highest-scoring learned agent, 0.60. Agents with similar driving scores fail in different ways, and agents that reliably stop at a blocked corridor still rarely wait for a gap in oncoming traffic. We also apply the method, unchanged, to a warehouse robot in Isaac Sim. The navigation policy we test stops at blocked gaps in only one of three families, and two fine-tuned versions of it pass more gaps cleanly but no longer stop at all.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO cs.CV cs.SE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Milan Bulat, Gino Ardelean, Ellington Kirby. 2026-11-04. Beyond Infraction Scores: Failure-Boundary Profiles for Closed-Loop Evaluation of Driving and Robot Navigation Agents. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06453

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

CubeDAgger: Interactive Imitation Learning for Dynamic Systems with Efficient yet Low-risk Interaction

Interactive imitation learning makes an agent's control policy robust by stepwise supervisions from an expert. The recent algorithms mostly employ expert-agent switching systems to reduce the expert's burden by limitedly selecting the supervision timing. However, this approach is useful only for static tasks; in dynamic tasks, timing discrepancies cause abrupt changes in actions, losing the robot's dynamic stability. This paper therefore proposes a novel method, named CubeDAgger, which improves robustness with less dynamic stability violations even for dynamic tasks. The proposed method is designed on a baseline, EnsembleDAgger, with three improvements. The first adds a regularization to explicitly activate the threshold for deciding the supervision timing. The second transforms the expert-agent switching system to an optimal consensus system of multiple action candidates. Third, autoregressive colored noise is injected to the agent's actions for time-consistent exploration. These improvements are verified by simulations, showing that the trained policies are sufficiently robust while maintaining dynamic stability during interaction. Finally, real-robot scooping experiments with a human expert demonstrate that the proposed method can learn robust policies from scratch based on just 30 minutes of interaction. https://youtu.be/kBl3SCTnVEM

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

EmboTeam: Asymmetric State Grounding for Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Collaboration

Heterogeneous multi-robot collaboration over long horizons requires both global task planning and robust coordination during execution. Existing plan- ners using large language models (LLMs) can generate task decompositions or symbolic plans, but often execute them as rigid action sequences, making them fragile to local state mismatches and synchronization failures. We propose Em- boTeam, a neuro-symbolic framework for asymmetric state grounding. An LLM generates structured state expectations, which are verified and coordinated through symbolic search using Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) and then grounded into a team-level parallel behavior tree. Robot-specific subtrees per- form precondition checking, skill execution, effect validation, local replanning, and blackboard-based synchronization. We further introduce MACE-THOR, con- taining 42 heterogeneous multi-robot tasks across 8 indoor layouts. EmboTeam improves task success rate from 12% to 55% and goal condition recall from 32% to 75% over LaMMA-P, demonstrating the effectiveness of synchronized reactive grounding for collaboration over long horizons.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

WoVR: World Models as Reliable Simulators for Post-Training VLA Policies with RL

Reinforcement learning (RL) promises to unlock capabilities beyond imitation learning for Vision--Language--Action (VLA) models, but its requirement for massive real-world interaction prevents direct deployment on physical robots. Recent work attempts to use learned world models as simulators for policy optimization, yet closed-loop imagined rollouts inevitably suffer from hallucination and long-horizon error accumulation. Such errors not only degrade visual fidelity, but also mislead policy optimization by providing unreliable learning signals. We propose WoVR, a reliable world-model-based RL framework for post-training VLA policies. Instead of assuming a faithful world model, WoVR explicitly regulates how RL interacts with imperfect imagined dynamics. It improves rollout stability through a controllable action-conditioned video world model, reshapes imagined interaction to reduce effective error depth via Keyframe-Initialized Rollouts, and maintains policy--simulator alignment through World Model-Policy co-evolution. Extensive experiments demonstrate that WoVR enables stable long-horizon imagined rollouts and effective policy optimization, achieving superior LIBERO performance and consistent real-world gains across multiple robotic platforms. These results show that world models can serve as practical simulators for RL when hallucination is explicitly controlled. Additional visualization results are available at https://wovr-rlinf.github.io.

cs.RO↗