arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.06297

Speaker-Consistent Grounding for Confusion-Resilient LLM-Based Target Speech Extraction

Abstract

Deterministic target-speaker extraction (TSE) tends to preserve observed linguistic content but may extract the interfering speaker. In contrast, autoregressive generative TSE improves perceptual quality, but is prone to content hallucination and speaker identity drift, which can be mitigated by model grounding with the evidence from the deterministic TSE. However, grounding such a generative TSE model with speaker-confused evidence may therefore reinforce the error. To address this gap, we proposed a repair-before-grounding framework with a training-free evidence-repair stage. Conditioning-diverse candidate selection (CDCS) selects target speaker-consistent evidence from complementary frozen TSE outputs. The selected waveform can then be used by code-space grounding (CSG) to constrain LLM-based TSE decoding. On Libri2Mix, CDCS reduces wrong-speaker extraction errors from 6.87% to 0.75% on clean mixtures and from 18.95% to 10.46% under noise. With the LLM-based TSE checkpoint unchanged, CSG further reduces noisy content- and acoustic-switch rates from 12.79% and 1.68% to 9.10% and 0.51%, respectively. Despite this stronger grounding, generative TSE retains its predicted perceptual-quality advantage over direct deterministic extraction. These results show that repairing evidence identity before grounding improves the reliability of generative TSE. Audio demos and code are available at https://hanyu-meng.github.io/LLM-TSE-Grounding-Demo/.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hanyu Meng, Hao Shi, Zhanhong He, Qiquan Zhang, Yang Xiao, Sungwoo Cho, Haowei Lou, Haizhou Li. 2026-11-04. Speaker-Consistent Grounding for Confusion-Resilient LLM-Based Target Speech Extraction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06297

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Auditory and Visual Virtualization in 6DoF XR: Effects on Plausibility and Dynamic Auditory Distance Perception

Extended reality (XR) enables controlled yet naturalistic multisensory experiments, but its validity depends on whether virtualized cues are perceptually plausible and lead to behavior comparable to the real world. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to perceptually evaluate a six-degree-of-freedom (6DoF) XR system that combines real-time room acoustic simulation, binaural rendering, and an audio-visually matched virtual replica of a large laboratory room in terms of both plausibility and behavior. In two experiments with 45 participants, we investigated how auditory and visual virtualization affect plausibility and dynamic auditory distance perception (ADP). A plausibility experiment compared real and virtual sound sources in audio-augmented reality (AAR) and virtual reality (VR), while a locomotion-based ADP experiment assessed distance-judgment accuracy, signed error, and task effort across four virtualization conditions. The system produced plausible binaural rendering in both AAR and VR, with higher plausibility in VR, indicating that perceptual requirements for XR audio depend on the visual reference frame. In the ADP task, any form of virtualization reduced accuracy and increased effort, although performance remained high overall. Virtual audio produced a bias toward nearer perceived source distances, whereas visual-only virtualization reduced accuracy without a significant directional bias. These effects did not add up in full VR. Overall, the findings demonstrate the strong potential of current 6DoF XR systems for interactive perceptual research, while revealing that task-specific behavioral validation may be necessary.

eess.AS↗

FUSEMOS: Perceptual Evaluation of Text-to-Music Generation with Dual-Encoder Fusion and Ranking-Aware Composite Loss

Perceptual evaluation of generated music is essential for developing text-to-music (TTM) generation systems. Existing automatic music perceptual evaluation methods rely solely on the contrastive language audio pretraining (CLAP) model to extract both audio and text features for predicting human-annotated mean opinion scores (MOS), particularly for overall musical impression (OMI) and textual alignment (TA). However, CLAP is limited in capturing fine-grained musical attributes such as timbre and expressiveness \emph{etc}. To address this, we propose FUSEMOS, a dual-encoder fusion framework that integrates CLAP with MERT, a self-supervised model pretrained on large scale music audio, to better capture both high level semantic alignment and detailed musical characteristics for more accurate OMI and TA estimation. Furthermore, to overcome the limitations of conventional regression losses in measuring human preferred relative ranking of music segments, we design a novel ranking-aware composite loss function. Experiments conducted on the MusicEval benchmark demonstrate that our approach outperforms the existing SOTA methods in both mean squared error and rank correlation metrics by a large margin.

eess.AS↗

A Unified Multi-Encoder Framework for Music Lyric Intelligibility Assessment: Bridging Invasive and Non-Invasive Paradigms

Lyric intelligibility significantly impacts music engagement and comprehension, especially for hearing-impaired individuals. Existing speech intelligibility metrics perform poorly in musical contexts due to differences in prosody, timing, and spectral dynamics. We propose a unified multi-encoder framework that supports both invasive and non-invasive modeling for robust lyric intelligibility prediction. By capturing complementary local acoustic-semantic alignments, global musical semantics, and ASR-derived textual cues, our method achieves superior performance over baselines on the ICASSP 2026 Cadenza dataset, with the best model achieving 26.61 RMSE, a $9.2$\% improvement over the baseline, demonstrating its flexibility and robustness.

eess.AS↗