arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.06074

Which One Is Sounding? Binaural Sounding Instance Disambiguation for Audio-Visual Segmentation

Abstract

Existing audio-visual segmentation methods mainly predict sound-related regions or category masks and often fail to identify the sounding instance when multiple same-class candidates coexist. Recent audio-visual instance segmentation methods address instance-level prediction but rely largely on motion and cross-frame association, which may become unreliable under sparse observations or inconspicuous motion. To this end, we introduce binaural audio, whose interaural differences encode source-direction information, to provide spatial constraints for distinguishing the sounding instance among same-class visual candidates. We propose Binaural Sounding Instance Disambiguation for Audio-Visual Segmentation (BiSID-AVS), which progressively refines category-level candidate responses into a mask of the true sounding instance. BiSID-AVS first grounds category-consistent candidate regions through audio prompting, then projects binaural cues into an image-plane spatial response map, and finally refines the true sounding instance through dual-level spatial conditioning at the feature and decoder levels. Experiments on the binaurally extended AVS-Synthetic benchmark and Habitat-AVS dataset for robotic indoor perception show that BiSID-AVS achieves the best performance on the multi-candidate subsets, improving instance-level mIoU by 35.19 and 41.21 percentage points, respectively, while substantially reducing false activation on non-sounding same-class regions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Haoze Ma, Yidi Li, Yu Ma, Pengyuan Zhao, Yi Shi, Bin Ren, Yanwen Guo, Dimitrios Kanoulas. 2026-11-04. Which One Is Sounding? Binaural Sounding Instance Disambiguation for Audio-Visual Segmentation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06074

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Towards Shutdownable Agents via Stochastic Choice

The POST-Agents Proposal (PAP) is an idea for ensuring that advanced artificial agents never resist shutdown. A key part of the PAP is using a novel `Discounted Reward for Same-Length Trajectories (DReST)' reward function to train agents to (1) pursue goals effectively conditional on each trajectory-length (be `USEFUL'), and (2) choose stochastically between different trajectory-lengths (be `NEUTRAL' about trajectory-lengths). In this paper, we propose evaluation metrics for USEFULNESS and NEUTRALITY. We use a DReST reward function to train simple agents to navigate gridworlds, and we find that these agents learn to be USEFUL and NEUTRAL. Our results thus provide some initial evidence that DReST reward functions could train advanced agents to be USEFUL and NEUTRAL. Our theoretical work suggests that these agents would be useful and shutdownable.

cs.AI↗

Depth-Recurrent Attention Mixture (Dreamer): Giving Latent Reasoning the Attention it Deserves

Depth-recurrence facilitates latent reasoning by sharing parameters across depths. However, prior work lacks combined FLOP-, parameter-, and memory-matched baselines, underutilizes depth-recurrence due to partially fixed layer stacks, and ignores the bottleneck of constant hidden-sizes that restricts many-step latent reasoning. To address this, we introduce a modular framework of depth-recurrent attention mixtures (Dreamer), combining sequence attention, depth attention, and sparse expert attention. It alleviates the hidden-size bottleneck through attention along depth, decouples scaling dimensions, and allows depth-recurrent models to scale efficiently and effectively. Across language reasoning benchmarks, our models require 2 to 8x fewer training tokens for the same accuracy as FLOP-, parameter-, and memory-matched SOTA, and outperform ca. 2x larger SOTA models with the same training tokens. We further present insights into knowledge usage across depths, e.g., showing 2 to 11x larger expert selection diversity than SOTA MoEs.

cs.AI↗

ASTRA-bench: Evaluating Tool-Use Agent Reasoning and Action Planning with Personal User Context

Next-generation AI must manage vast personal data, diverse tools, and multi-step reasoning, yet most benchmarks remain context-free and single-turn. We present ASTRA-bench (Assistant Skills in Tool-use, Reasoning \& Action-planning), a benchmark that uniquely unifies time-evolving personal context with an interactive toolbox and complex user intents. Our event-driven pipeline generates 2,413 scenarios across four protagonists, grounded in longitudinal life events and annotated by referential, functional, and informational complexity. Evaluation of state-of-the-art models (e.g., Claude-4.5-Opus, DeepSeek-V3.2) reveals significant performance degradation under high-complexity conditions, with argument generation emerging as the primary bottleneck. These findings expose critical limitations in current agents' ability to ground reasoning within messy personal context and orchestrate reliable multi-step plans. We release ASTRA-bench with a full execution environment and evaluation scripts to provide a diagnostic testbed for developing truly context-aware AI assistants.

cs.AI↗