arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.05907

Does Your Trial Simulator Know What the Drug Does? An Intervention-Blind Test of Interventional Validity on 7,207 Registered Trials

Abstract

Patient world models are increasingly proposed as simulators of clinical trials, and recent surveys rank their capabilities on a ladder from temporal prediction to counterfactual rollouts. Position on that ladder is currently assigned by reading papers rather than by measurement. We turn the counterfactual rung into a measured quantity. From 30,119 completed phase 2/3 trials with results posted to ClinicalTrials.gov we construct 9,996 audited within-trial contrasts from 7,207 trials, and we score a simulator on how much of its accuracy depends on knowing which intervention was tested. The instrument is an intervention-blind reference: the same model, trained on the same trials, with every intervention-identifying field withheld. Interventional skill is the error the full model removes relative to that reference. On a temporal split (878 test contrasts from 655 trials) a registry-trained gradient-boosting simulator removes a fifth of the error of a trivial baseline, but its interventional skill is -0.12 (95% CI -0.21 to -0.05): withholding the intervention makes it better, and no alternative featurisation, stratum, temporal cut or same-molecule retrieval yields an interval above zero. A frontier language model reading only the registered protocol has interventional skill 0.20 [0.08, 0.31]; smaller and open-weight models sit at the limit of detection. Perturbation tests show the large model uses the intervention as such: swapping the arms reverses the sign of its prediction in 86% of contrasts. The blind reference is itself not drug-blind (a language model recovers the withheld drug class 45% of the time from the blind prompt), so interventional skill is a conservative lower bound. A reliability layer shows that ranking by predicted error lowers it but that calibrated error control does not transfer under temporal shift. Benchmark, code, prompts and per-call model outputs are released.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alicem Koyun. 2026-11-04. Does Your Trial Simulator Know What the Drug Does? An Intervention-Blind Test of Interventional Validity on 7,207 Registered Trials. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05907

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Improving Minority Population Sampling with BISG Probabilities: Evidence from a Survey of Jewish Americans

Sampling geographically dispersed minority populations poses substantial challenges when individual group membership cannot be directly observed. Although stratified sampling can offer efficiency gains, these gains are typically modest unless the minority population is highly concentrated within a small number of strata. In this paper, we propose using Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding (BISG) to enhance the efficiency of minority population sampling. BISG generates individual-level probabilities of minority group membership based on names and residential addresses. We incorporate these probabilities into a stratified Poisson probability sampling design. Applying the proposed approach to a national survey of Jewish Americans, we find that our estimates closely align with those from a large-scale Pew Research Center survey of the same population, which relied on a substantially more expensive sampling strategy involving geographic stratification and screening. At a fraction of the cost, our survey reproduces nearly identical patterns observed by Pew, including estimates of religious denomination prevalence and participation in specific religious activities.

stat.AP↗

When Do Sports Leagues Stop Being Competitive? Bayesian Detection of Competitive-Balance Eras from Match-Level Data

Competitive balance shapes outcome uncertainty, fan interest, and league regulation, yet standard measures summarize realized standings and cannot separate structural ability differences from match-level randomness. We develop a Bayesian framework that infers structural competitive balance from longitudinal match outcomes. Team abilities are obtained by projecting Gaussian auxiliary variables onto a graph-fused l1 polytope whose radius measures total pairwise ability variation. The projection places positive probability on exact ties, so statistically indistinguishable teams form explicit rank tiers. The radius equals realized ability variation whenever the constraint binds, linking it to parity, detectability, and structural inequality. An adaptive finite-regime model lets competitive eras recur, emerge, and disappear while team hierarchies remain season specific. Simulations show accurate recovery of regimes, radii, abilities, and tiers. Applied to 25 English Premier League seasons, the model identifies a persistent shift to a more stratified league beginning in 2005/06, with 2010/11 the only later return to the compressed regime. It also shows that a close title race can coexist with wide league-wide separation and that head-to-head results can separate clubs level on points. The framework gives leagues a model-based measure of balance to inform debates on revenue sharing and financial regulation.

stat.AP↗

Bayesian Spatio-temporal Modeling of Multi-Site Wastewater Surveillance Data

Wastewater surveillance provides population-level evidence of infectious disease activity. As surveillance expands across multiple sites, repeated measurements must be analyzed jointly while accounting for differences among sites and the public health regions they represent. We develop a Bayesian spatio-temporal framework that decomposes wastewater measurements into a shared epidemic curve, spatially correlated regional deviations, persistent site effects, and within-site temporal dependence. This hierarchical decomposition accommodates unequal observation windows and sampling schedules, allowing regional trajectories to be compared while preserving site-level heterogeneity. A direct marginal spatial covariance specification further separates the magnitude of regional variation from the strength of association between neighboring regions, providing distinct interpretations of these two sources of spatial variation. We also introduce region-specific time shifts to distinguish regional leads and lags in epidemic timing from differences in signal levels and local fluctuations. Simulation studies demonstrate the recovery of these components and show that omitting true time shifts can lead to increased estimates of residual temporal variation. Application to Ontario SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance data reveals persistent site heterogeneity, within-site temporal dependence, and spatial association among neighboring regions. Regional timing differences are more pronounced during the first year of Omicron than in the XBB-and-later period.

stat.AP↗