arXiv · 2611.05482
Euclid. Predicting scaling relations for emission-line galaxies using simulated data
Abstract
The Euclid spectroscopic surveys will substantially increase the number of observed emission-line galaxies. We assess the ability of the Euclid Wide Survey (EWS) and Euclid Deep Survey (EDS), at the final DR3 depth, to recover the star-forming main sequence (MS), dust-mass relation (DMR), and mass-metallicity relation (MZR) from emission-line measurements. We use MAMBO (mocks with abundance matching in Bologna) spectroscopic simulations processed with the official Euclid pipelines. The MS is traced over $0\leq z\leq 4$ using Pa$β$, H$α$, and [OII] as SFR tracers. The shallow EWS flux limit biases the MS towards higher normalisation and a flatter slope by selecting the brightest, most strongly star-forming galaxies. The deeper EDS enables almost complete sampling with Pa$β$ and H$α$ at log$_{10}(M_*/M_\odot)\geq10.3$ over $0\leq z\leq 1.88$, with mild biases at both redshift limits. The [OII]-based MS is increasingly biased towards higher SFRs at the highest redshifts. The DMR is traced through the Balmer decrement over $1.45\leq z\leq 1.88$ and $0.9\leq z\leq 1.88$ in the EWS and EDS, respectively. The derived colour excess agree well with the input values, although detecting the faint H$β$ line restricts the sample to less obscured galaxies at fixed $M_*$, particularly in the EWS; the DMR is better sampled in the EDS. Finally, a golden sample detected in multiple optical rest-frame emission lines at $1.49\leq z\leq 1.88$ recovers gas-phase metallicities with typical accuracy of 0.1 dex at log$_{10}(M_*/M_\odot)\geq10$, while lower-mass galaxies show biases up to 0.15 dex. Relative to H-band limited sample, this sample preferentially traces the upper MS and lower MZR. Despite the simplified simulations lacking effects such as mutual spectral contamination and detector persistence, these forecasts provide a benchmark for future Euclid spectroscopic analyses.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Euclid Collaboration, C. Mancini, L. Gabarra, S. Quai, L. Pozzetti, P. Cassata, M. Talia, M. Scodeggio, M. Bolzonella, M. Moresco, D. Vergani, E. Maiorano, V. Le Brun, B. R. Granett, S. Bisogni, A. Gargiulo, G. Vietri, M. Siudek, R. Ragusa, G. Herzog, G. De Lucia, L. Scharré, M. Fumana, M. Hirschmann, V. Allevato, L. Bisigello, A. Enia, A. Feltre, G. Rodighiero, G. Zamorani, P. Corcho-Caballero, X. Lopez Lopez, S. Andreon, N. Auricchio, C. Baccigalupi, M. Baldi, A. Balestra, S. Bardelli, P. Battaglia, A. Biviano, E. Branchini, M. Brescia, S. Camera, V. Capobianco, C. Carbone, J. Carretero, M. Castellano, G. Castignani, S. Cavuoti, P. -Y. Chabaud, A. Cimatti, C. Colodro-Conde, G. Congedo, L. Conversi, Y. Copin, F. Courbin, H. M. Courtois, H. Degaudenzi, S. de la Torre, H. Dole, F. Dubath, C. A. J. Duncan, X. Dupac, S. Escoffier, M. Farina, R. Farinelli, F. Faustini, S. Ferriol, F. Finelli, S. Fotopoulou, N. Fourmanoit, M. Frailis, E. Franceschi, S. Galeotta, K. George, B. Gillis, C. Giocoli, J. Gracia-Carpio, A. Grazian, F. Grupp, S. V. H. Haugan, S. Hemmati, W. Holmes, F. Hormuth, A. Hornstrup, K. Jahnke, M. Jhabvala, B. Joachimi, S. Kermiche, A. Kiessling, B. Kubik, M. Kümmel, M. Kunz, H. Kurki-Suonio, A. M. C. Le Brun, S. Ligori, P. B. Lilje, V. Lindholm, I. Lloro, M. Magliocchetti. 2026-11-03. Euclid. Predicting scaling relations for emission-line galaxies using simulated data. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05482
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.