arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2611.04040

PanelGP: A Probabilistic Factor Model for Asset-Return Panels

Andrea Ruglioni·Damir Filipovic
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We develop PanelGP, a conditional factor model for large panels of stock returns in which firm characteristics determine the factor loadings and economic conditions determine the expected factors. Both relations are estimated nonparametrically with Gaussian-process priors. The kernel choice nests instrumented principal component analysis (IPCA) as well as smooth nonlinear maps. Asset-specific loading innovations and common factor innovations separate idiosyncratic from systematic risk, so one estimated model forecasts both expected returns and their covariance matrix. Estimation uses sparse variational inference with a joint posterior over loadings and factors. Because each predicted return is bilinear in a Gaussian state, the predictive covariance matrix and the cumulants of any portfolio have closed forms. In simulations, the estimator recovers the nonlinear maps and the variance parameters. For S&P 500 constituents over 1995-2024, nonlinear loadings rank stocks better than affine loadings and improve the Gaussian log score. Relative to IPCA, the resulting portfolios have higher Sharpe ratios, also net of trading costs, and the minimum-variance portfolio has lower volatility. The predicted variances rank stocks and months by risk but are too compressed.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.STecon.EMstat.ML

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andrea Ruglioni, Damir Filipovic. 2026-11-02. PanelGP: A Probabilistic Factor Model for Asset-Return Panels. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04040

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

How market volatility responds to a preceding price trend: a lag-resolved measurement in cryptocurrencies and equities

We quantify the response of market volatility to a preceding price trend as a function of lag at minute resolution. The asymmetry of the response is investigated. The sample consists of trades in three of the largest cryptocurrencies on a single exchange and in three large US stocks and the S&P 500 exchange-traded fund between 2020 and 2026. For the cryptocurrencies the asymmetry is positive, matching the sign of the leverage effect. It follows the trend: it is greatest at the first measurable lag, 20 minutes, and weak at negative lags, where the trend follows the volatility. At those lags a scan over window lengths resolves a small component of opposite sign that has not yet been disentangled from what the statistic itself generates. For Bitcoin and Ether the asymmetry decays to one half by a lag of roughly an hour and a half. Decomposition under time reversal divides the asymmetry into a T-even part and a T-odd part. Only the latter carries an arrow of time. For Bitcoin and Ether the T-odd part is detected. At the first lag it is between 0.4 and 0.9 of the T-even part at windows of 10 and 20 minutes. At 20 minutes this is the ratio produced by a purely one-sided response in this statistic: at that window the response is consistent with being wholly one-sided in time. None of the equities exhibits a detectable T-odd part at 20 minutes in the straight-line fit over 2.5 trend scales. This fit is the shared instrument of comparison. The fund's return-variance correlation displays an arrow of time; the cryptocurrencies' asymmetry is independent of the shapes of the fits, and Bitcoin's and Ether's of their ranges. On simulated and shuffled data without coupling, the analysis yields zero with errors of the correct size. It also recovers the time scale of a one-sided response embedded in a simulated market.

q-fin.ST↗
arXiv2026

Are LLM Research Agents Reliable Judges of Predictability? Evidence from Planted-Signal Worlds

Researchers ask large language model (LLM) research agents whether a forecasting model beats a static benchmark, a verdict that real data cannot check. We treat the agent as a statistical test and score pre-specified runs of three frontier models and one open-weight model in simulated worlds with a planted signal. The agents detect weak signals more often than a pre-specified out-of-sample test, mainly because they accept weaker evidence: held to an agent's false-positive rate, a conventional in-sample test does as well or better. The agents claim predictability too often in worlds without a signal, state miscalibrated probabilities, and change their verdicts after a sentence about prior research; the magnitudes depend on the model. The excess false claims persist in simulated worlds without a resampling artifact. Agent verdicts are informative but need a neutral brief, a decision rule fixed outside the agent and a sealed holdout.

q-fin.ST↗
arXiv2026

Adapting Altman's bankruptcy prediction model to the compositional data methodology

Using standard financial ratios as variables in statistical analyses has been related to several serious problems, such as extreme outliers, asymmetry, non-normality, and nonlinearity. The compositional-data methodology has been successfully applied to solve these problems and has always yielded substantially different results when compared to standard financial ratios. An under-researched area is the use of financial log-ratios computed with the compositional-data methodology to predict bankruptcy or the related terms of business default, insolvency or failure. Another under-researched area is the use of machine learning methods in combination with compositional log-ratios. The present article adapts the classical Altman bankruptcy prediction model and some of its extensions to the compositional methodology with pairwise log-ratios and three common statistical and machine learning tools: logistic regression models, k-nearest neighbours, and random forests, and compares the results with standard financial ratios. Data from the sector in the Spanish economy with the largest number of bankrupt firms according to the first two digits of the NACE code (46XX "wholesale trade, except of motor vehicles and motorcycles") were obtained from the Iberian Balance sheet Analysis System. The sample size (31,131 firms, of which 97 were bankrupt) was divided into a training and a validation dataset. The training dataset was downsampled to one healthy firm to each bankrupt firm. No outliers were removed. Focusing on predictive performance, the results show that compositional methods are better than standard ratios in terms of sensitivity (recall), with mixed results regarding specificity, compositional random forests and compositional logistic regression behaving the best.

q-fin.ST↗