arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.02746

Replay for LLM Continual Learning with Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation

Abstract

Multi-teacher on-policy distillation (MOPD) distills several domain experts into one student and is used in the post-training of recent large language models. It trains on all domains at once, so every expert must be available at the same time. In practice, capabilities often arrive one after another, and the experts of earlier domains may be gone when a new domain is learned. Distilling the experts in sequence then suffers from catastrophic forgetting of the earlier domains. Some recent pipelines store a snapshot after every stage and end with a multi-teacher recovery stage taught by all snapshots. The number of stored models then grows with the number of stages. Different from these pipelines, this paper formulates continual MOPD by what is kept from earlier stages and studies replay toward the previous student. Inside every stage, prompts of earlier domains are replayed with the student of the previous stage as their teacher, so neither earlier experts nor stage snapshots are kept. Two design choices of replay are explored. The replay budget of a stage is either shared among the earlier domains or fixed per earlier domain. Replay steps either distill the token distribution alone or add alignment of hidden states, region-pooled self-attention scores and value relations. A five-domain benchmark of logic, math, code, safety and instruction following is built from public experts of one 1.5B student. Experiments on its 14 benchmarks show that, without storing any snapshot, replay toward the previous student closes most of the gap between sequential distillation and joint MOPD. With a fixed replay share per earlier domain, it performs on par with recovery from all stored snapshots.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yiqiao Qiu. 2026-11-03. Replay for LLM Continual Learning with Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23906641

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Subspace Node Pruning

Node pruning is the art of removing computational units such as neurons, filters, attention heads, or even entire layers to significantly reduce inference time while retaining network performance. In this work, we show that a broad family of importance measures, from activation-based to Fisher-based, share a common quadratic form. Through a lower-triangular change of basis, this form yields a pruning subspace in which entire nodes can be removed while the impact of the lost units is simultaneously recovered via linear least squares. Furthermore, the importance measures within our subspace are decoupled and additive through an orthogonalization of the layer activations, allowing multi-node pruning within layers without interference between importance scores. Our method, Subspace Node Pruning (SNP), outperforms the compared baselines on VGG-16 and ResNet-50 on ImageNet. On OPT-125M and LLaMA-2 7B, SNP matches the state-of-the-art LLM Surgeon at a 40-shot schedule and outperforms it whenever fewer shots are used, all without any retraining after pruning.

cs.LG↗

On the growth of the parameters of approximating ReLU neural networks

This work focuses on the analysis of fully connected feed forward ReLU neural networks as they approximate a given, smooth function. In contrast to conventionally studied universal approximation properties under increasing architectures, e.g., in terms of width or depth of the networks, we are concerned with the asymptotic growth of the parameters of approximating networks. Such results are of interest, e.g., for error analysis or consistency results for neural network training. The main result of our work is that, for a ReLU architecture with state of the art approximation error, the realizing parameters grow at most polynomially. The obtained rate with respect to a normalized network size is compared to existing results and is shown to be superior in most cases, in particular for high dimensional input.

cs.LG↗

Correlations Are Ruining Your Gradient Descent

Natural gradient descent, and the preconditioned optimizers which have followed from it, correct gradient descent by estimating curvature and applying its inverse to the gradient. For any single layer of a deep neural network, this correction can be shown to approximately separate into two factors: one which accounts for correlations in the gradient signal, and one which accounts for correlations in the data arriving at that layer. Herein we show that this second factor can be expressed as a change of basis rather than of curvature and, considered thus, it can be removed from the optimizer entirely and placed within the network itself. Specifically, we show that, once forward weights are corrected, right-sided natural gradient descent can be implemented in a form which has three exactly equivalent forms: a gradient preconditioner, a decorrelating linear transform in the forward pass, or a set of recurrent dynamics in which all updates are Hebbian and rely only upon locally available signals. The (recurrent) decorrelation method we discover aligns closely with proposed methods for inhibitory learning and homeostatic plasticity in the brain. Notably, our transform requires no matrix inverse, no matrix decomposition, and no information beyond that which is available at an individual synapse. It can therefore be applied in distributed and physically constrained systems, including neuromorphic hardware and nervous systems, where existing preconditioners cannot. We demonstrate its effectiveness empirically in convolutional and residual network models while significantly improving a range of approximate biologically plausible methods for credit assignment.

cs.LG↗