arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.01778

MemRole: From Memories to Decisions for Long-Horizon Reasoning in Role-Playing Agents

Abstract

LLM-based role-playing agents are fluent at imitating a character's style, yet struggle to make role-consistent decisions over long narrative horizons. Such decisions are shaped by experiences spanning many prior scenes, which are often partial and may point in different directions. Existing methods inject cross-scene memories as context, but do not reason about how past events shape a character's current motivations and behavior. We propose MemRole, a framework that makes this memory-to-decision process explicit. It introduces Long-Horizon Memory Thinking (LHMT), a reasoning schema that decomposes hidden reasoning into context understanding, memory activation, and response strategy planning, trained on a novel-derived dataset whose character-grounded, timeline-constrained memory pools limit each character to what it could plausibly know at the current narrative point. Beyond supervised fine-tuning, we propose Self-Refining On-Policy Self-Distillation (SR-OPSD): the model critiques its own rollouts against the reference under a data-driven rubric, and a critique-conditioned teacher view of the same model distills token-level guidance back into the policy. MemRole-32B improves over its backbone by 15.2 points on memory-grounded role-playing, performs on par with frontier LLMs such as GPT-5.4, and achieves the best character-motivation recognition accuracy on CroSS-MR.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mengting Li, Xilong Cheng, Zhihao Xiao, Zhenhua Xu, Jingyuan Zhou, Linfeng Li, Long Zhang, Borui Cai, Yunxiao Qin. 2026-11-01. MemRole: From Memories to Decisions for Long-Horizon Reasoning in Role-Playing Agents. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01778

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Semantic Self-Consistency: Enhancing Language Model Reasoning via Semantic Weighting

While large language models (LLMs) have rapidly improved their performance on a broad number of tasks, they still often fall short on reasoning tasks. As LLMs become more integrated in diverse real-world tasks, advancing their reasoning capabilities is crucial to their effectiveness in nuanced, complex problems. Wang et al.'s self-consistency framework reveals that sampling multiple rationales before taking a majority vote reliably improves model performance across various closed-answer reasoning tasks. Standard methods based on this framework aggregate the final decisions of these rationales but fail to utilize the semantic information detailed in the step-by-step reasoning paths. Our work introduces semantic self-consistency, enhancing this approach by incorporating and analyzing both the reasoning paths of these rationales in addition to their final decisions before taking a majority vote. These methods not only improve the reliability of reasoning paths but also cause more robust performance on complex reasoning tasks.

cs.CL↗

Beyond Isolated Dots: Benchmarking Structured Table Construction as Deep Knowledge Extraction

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly expected to extract and synthesize structured information from complex real-world documents, yet they typically produce unstructured, hard-to-verify paragraph-style outputs. We introduce AOE (Arranged and Organized Extraction), a bilingual benchmark that evaluates LLMs' ability to distill long-form, multi-document inputs (64k to 1.8M tokens) into structured tables. AOE comprises 12 tasks across four domains (academic, financial, legal, and medical), each grounded in genuine analytical needs, with schema guidance provided to isolate extraction quality from formatting variance. We evaluate 12 frontier LLMs (both open-weight and proprietary) under four generation settings of increasing autonomy: direct full-document input, RAG-based retrieval, offline document-browsing agent, and online web-search agent. Even the best-performing model achieves only 42.7% Cell F1, and retrieval-augmented approaches often degrade rather than improve performance, revealing that structured extraction from long contexts remains a fundamental challenge - an "Area of Effect" (AOE) that impacts all tested systems.

cs.CL↗

PersonaFuse: A Situation-Aware Post-Training Framework for Adaptive LLM Behavior in Enterprise Tasks

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in enterprise settings to support task execution and workflow automation. Despite the strong performance of general-purpose models on standard benchmarks, organizations often need to adapt them to domain-specific tasks and operational constraints in practice. However, existing post-training approaches introduce capability trade-offs and lack mechanisms for situational adaptation. In this work, we propose PersonaFuse, a post-training framework that enables situation-aware behavioral adaptation in LLMs. Grounded in Trait Activation Theory and operationalized through the Five-Factor Model, PersonaFuse dynamically adjusts model behavior based on task context using a mixture-of-experts architecture with trait-level experts and a context-aware routing mechanism. We evaluate PersonaFuse at three levels. At the capability level, it achieves balanced improvements across general reasoning, interaction quality, and safety without introducing trade-offs. At the workflow level, it improves task completion in enterprise scenarios involving tool use and structured execution across both B2B and B2C tasks. At the deployment level, we analyze model selection under cost and safety constraints using a capability-cost frontier framework, showing that models adapted with PersonaFuse achieve more favorable trade-offs and are consistently selected as optimal across deployment scenarios. PersonaFuse provides a practical framework for developing LLMs that are not only capable, but also adaptable and deployable in real-world enterprise environments.

cs.CL↗