arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2611.01245

Learning What to Ask and What to Believe: Distilling a Variational Bayesian Agent into Language Models

Baichuan Li·Yanling Chang·Alfredo Garcia
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Interactive tasks such as eliciting a user's preferences or diagnosing a hidden mechanism require an agent to track its uncertainty over a latent state, ask informative questions and act on the answers. Language models have no explicit mechanism for this, whereas Bayesian information seeking provides one through posterior inference and expected information gain (EIG), and we ask whether it can be distilled into an 8B language model. Our teacher, a lightweight Bayesian agent with a sequential variational belief and EIG query selection, matches or approaches exact and particle references on three task families. We generate synthetic interactions with the teacher on episodes disjoint from the benchmark and fine-tune \Student{} to reproduce its queries and its belief state as a structured scratchpad. On three Multi-Turn Puzzles tasks the student raises Circuit Decoding from 0.00 to 0.93 success, lowers the normalized rank of the recommended film from 0.50 to 0.10 and cuts word guessing from 32 to 3.4 attempts, exceeding the strongest reported language models on the two comparable tasks. Exposing the belief state closes much of the gap where the decision is an implicit computation rather than a read-out of the interaction; in matched teacher contrasts, EIG supervision consistently outperforms random querying, whereas greater inference fidelity does not uniformly improve the distilled student; a 70B language-model teacher does not match the Bayesian teacher in downstream student performance, and the learned skill does not transfer to an unseen task family. Variational Bayesian information seeking can thus be amortized into a language model by transferring the belief state that drives its questions and decisions.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Baichuan Li, Yanling Chang, Alfredo Garcia. 2026-10-31. Learning What to Ask and What to Believe: Distilling a Variational Bayesian Agent into Language Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01245

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Subspace Node Pruning

Node pruning is the art of removing computational units such as neurons, filters, attention heads, or even entire layers to significantly reduce inference time while retaining network performance. In this work, we show that a broad family of importance measures, from activation-based to Fisher-based, share a common quadratic form. Through a lower-triangular change of basis, this form yields a pruning subspace in which entire nodes can be removed while the impact of the lost units is simultaneously recovered via linear least squares. Furthermore, the importance measures within our subspace are decoupled and additive through an orthogonalization of the layer activations, allowing multi-node pruning within layers without interference between importance scores. Our method, Subspace Node Pruning (SNP), outperforms the compared baselines on VGG-16 and ResNet-50 on ImageNet. On OPT-125M and LLaMA-2 7B, SNP matches the state-of-the-art LLM Surgeon at a 40-shot schedule and outperforms it whenever fewer shots are used, all without any retraining after pruning.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

On the growth of the parameters of approximating ReLU neural networks

This work focuses on the analysis of fully connected feed forward ReLU neural networks as they approximate a given, smooth function. In contrast to conventionally studied universal approximation properties under increasing architectures, e.g., in terms of width or depth of the networks, we are concerned with the asymptotic growth of the parameters of approximating networks. Such results are of interest, e.g., for error analysis or consistency results for neural network training. The main result of our work is that, for a ReLU architecture with state of the art approximation error, the realizing parameters grow at most polynomially. The obtained rate with respect to a normalized network size is compared to existing results and is shown to be superior in most cases, in particular for high dimensional input.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Correlations Are Ruining Your Gradient Descent

Natural gradient descent, and the preconditioned optimizers which have followed from it, correct gradient descent by estimating curvature and applying its inverse to the gradient. For any single layer of a deep neural network, this correction can be shown to approximately separate into two factors: one which accounts for correlations in the gradient signal, and one which accounts for correlations in the data arriving at that layer. Herein we show that this second factor can be expressed as a change of basis rather than of curvature and, considered thus, it can be removed from the optimizer entirely and placed within the network itself. Specifically, we show that, once forward weights are corrected, right-sided natural gradient descent can be implemented in a form which has three exactly equivalent forms: a gradient preconditioner, a decorrelating linear transform in the forward pass, or a set of recurrent dynamics in which all updates are Hebbian and rely only upon locally available signals. The (recurrent) decorrelation method we discover aligns closely with proposed methods for inhibitory learning and homeostatic plasticity in the brain. Notably, our transform requires no matrix inverse, no matrix decomposition, and no information beyond that which is available at an individual synapse. It can therefore be applied in distributed and physically constrained systems, including neuromorphic hardware and nervous systems, where existing preconditioners cannot. We demonstrate its effectiveness empirically in convolutional and residual network models while significantly improving a range of approximate biologically plausible methods for credit assignment.

cs.LG↗