arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.01003

Robust distortion riskmetrics under symmetry, unimodality, and Wasserstein constraints

Abstract

We study worst-case distortion riskmetrics over symmetric distributions with prescribed mean and variance in a Wasserstein ball around a reference distribution. Our key contribution is the construction of a reference-dependent auxiliary distortion that encodes the Wasserstein constraint while preserving symmetry under the concave-envelope operation. Under suitable regularity and nondegeneracy conditions, this construction yields sharp upper bounds for distortions of bounded variation, allowing nonmonotonicity and interior discontinuities, and identifies extremal distributions when the bounds are attained. An approximation preserving symmetry and the prescribed moments exactly shows that upper semicontinuous relaxation of the symmetrized distortion leaves the supremum unchanged for budgets strictly above the feasibility threshold. With additional unimodality, symmetry fixes the quantile's concavity-convexity transition at the midpoint, yielding a characterization via $L^2$-projection onto a fixed closed convex cone for absolutely continuous distortions with square-integrable derivatives. Numerical examples for ES, RVaR, and VaR illustrate how shape restrictions and the reference distribution affect feasibility and worst-case risk. Simulations with data-dependent Wasserstein radii examine worst-case ES and feasibility under correctly specified and misspecified shape restrictions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Liu Peng, Zhang Yiying, Zuo Baishuai. 2026-10-31. Robust distortion riskmetrics under symmetry, unimodality, and Wasserstein constraints. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Dynamic star-shaped risk measures and $g$-expectations

Motivated by static monetary and star-shaped risk measures, this paper investigates representation theorems within a dynamic framework. We show that dynamic monetary risk measures can be represented as the lower envelope of a family of dynamic convex risk measures, and normalized dynamic star-shaped risk measures can be represented as that of a family of normalized dynamic convex risk measures. Furthermore, we establish the intrinsic link between dynamic monetary risk measures and dynamic star-shaped risk measures. Moreover, we examine the associated sensitivity and time consistency issues for such risk measures. Finally, we characterize star-shapedness of risk measures induced by bounded quadratic BSDE solutions and illustrate normalized time-consistent examples through $g$-expectations.

q-fin.RM↗

Robust distortion riskmetrics over Bregman--Wasserstein balls and their intersections

We study the worst-case values of distortion riskmetrics over Bregman--Wasserstein balls around a reference distribution. Unlike the squared $2$-Wasserstein distance, Bregman--Wasserstein divergences can penalize upward and downward deviations differently. Our main result applies to generalized distortion functions $g:[0,1]\to\R$ of bounded variation, with $g(0)=0$ and suitable endpoint regularity, which need not be monotone, normalized, or upper semicontinuous. For strictly convex generators satisfying a two-sided $p$-growth condition, we obtain a one-dimensional dual representation of the worst-case value. When a positive Lagrange multiplier makes the divergence constraint binding, we identify a unique quantile function through a least concave majorant and characterize when it attains the supremum. For absolutely continuous generalized distortion functions, we characterize the solution through an isotonic projection; we also study more general generators and shape constraints, including unimodality. Finally, we extend the analysis to intersections of Bregman--Wasserstein balls, describing models acceptable to several parties involved in decision making, and illustrate the results numerically.

q-fin.RM↗

RiskReason: A Benchmark for Verifiable Financial Risk Reasoning

Robust financial-risk inference requires more than mathematical correctness. Models must accurately apply conditional rules, maintain evolving financial states, and make decisions that respect operational constraints. This work introduces RiskReason, a benchmark for verifiable financial-risk reasoning that spans diverse risk-management mechanisms. The benchmark includes Standard tasks, which assess individual financial mechanisms, and Long-horizon tasks, which combine multiple mechanisms through extended dependencies. Each task provides reference outcomes, formal specifications, reasoning annotations, and dependency representations to support systematic analysis of model performance. Eleven model configurations are evaluated using strict single-attempt accuracy, complemented by structural and qualitative failure analyses. The strongest configurations achieve 80.0--90.2\% overall accuracy, with several maintaining high performance on composed financial scenarios. However, analysis of failures reveals incorrect risk decisions despite accurate intermediate calculations, inconsistent propagation of financial states, and remediation actions that violate binding constraints. In contrast, some strict evaluation failures result from incomplete reporting rather than incorrect financial conclusions. These findings indicate that aggregate accuracy alone is insufficient to characterize financial-risk reasoning reliability and motivate evaluations that distinguish numerical correctness, state consistency, constraint satisfaction, and decision validity.

q-fin.RM↗