arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2611.00802

EduExplain: A Benchmark for Explanation-Set Retrieval and Storyboard Construction in Educational Explanation

Aryan Ahmed·Riti Verma·Sanskar Singh·Maya Ramanath
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Generating an educational explanation for a learner's query is not a single retrieval step but a pipeline: a system must first retrieve a compact set of complementary resources--passages, figures, examples, activities--that jointly support an explanation, then structure that set into an ordered, timed, role-assigned plan before rendering it as a lesson or video. Existing retrieval benchmarks evaluate neither stage at the level these applications require: they score individual documents rather than explanation sets, and provide no ground truth for how a set should be organised into an explanation. We present EduExplain, a benchmark providing human-validated ground truth for both stages. Built from secondary-level science textbooks, it comprises 6,921 typed, multimodal resources and 2,123 concepts, and pairs each of 321 learner-oriented queries with one or more human-validated explanation sets (retrieval ground truth) and 741 reference storyboards (structuring ground truth). The benchmark exposes characteristics absent from prior datasets: heterogeneous multimodal retrieval units, multiple valid explanation sets per query, and plans whose quality depends on pedagogical role composition, grounding, and timing rather than relevance alone. We describe an LLM-assisted, human-validated construction pipeline, report inter-annotator agreement for both layers, and establish baselines for each stage--lexical, dense, multimodal, and cross-encoder retrieval paired with four selection strategies, and free-form and fixed-template storyboard construction. Our results show that first-stage retrieval quality dominates retrieval-stage performance, that off-the-shelf diversity-based selection underperforms simple top-ranked selection, and that unconstrained and rigidly templated structuring both fall short of the reference plans. The benchmark is available at https://github.com/data-iitd/eduexplain.

Explore related subjects

cs.IR

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aryan Ahmed, Riti Verma, Sanskar Singh, Maya Ramanath. 2026-10-31. EduExplain: A Benchmark for Explanation-Set Retrieval and Storyboard Construction in Educational Explanation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00802

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

DAT: Dynamic Alpha Tuning for Hybrid Retrieval in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Hybrid retrieval techniques in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems enhance information retrieval by combining dense and sparse (e.g., BM25-based) retrieval methods. However, existing approaches struggle with adaptability, as fixed weighting schemes fail to adjust to different queries. To address this, we propose DAT (Dynamic Alpha Tuning), a novel hybrid retrieval framework that dynamically balances dense retrieval and BM25 for each query. DAT leverages a large language model (LLM) to evaluate the effectiveness of the top-1 results from both retrieval methods, assigning an effectiveness score to each. It then calibrates the optimal weighting factor through effectiveness score normalization, ensuring a more adaptive and query-aware weighting between the two approaches. Empirical results show that DAT consistently significantly outperforms fixed-weighting hybrid retrieval methods across various evaluation metrics. Even on smaller models, DAT delivers strong performance, highlighting its efficiency and adaptability.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

Explaining Group Recommendations via Counterfactuals

Group recommender systems help users make collective choices but often lack transparency, leaving group members uncertain about why items are suggested. Existing explanation methods focus on individuals, offering limited support for groups where multiple preferences interact. In this work, we introduce and formalize the problem of finding counterfactual explanations for group recommendations. We introduce a comprehensive set of item- and explanation-level metrics that capture different aspects, such as relevance, popularity, explanation utility, interpretability, and fairness. We design five algorithms that employ techniques such as search-space pruning, greedy selection, early stopping, and incremental refinement to reduce computational cost and the number of recommender calls while producing high-quality explanations. The algorithms consider different trade-offs; for example, some prioritize computational efficiency at the expense of explanation quality, while others focus on improving explanation quality at a higher computational cost. Experiments on real-world datasets analyze these trade-offs in terms of explanation size, computational cost, utility, and fairness.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

MuonRec: Shifting the Optimizer Paradigm Beyond Adam in Scalable Generative Recommendation

Recommender systems (RecSys) are increasingly emphasizing scaling, leveraging larger architectures and more interaction data to improve personalization. Yet, despite the optimizer's pivotal role in training, modern RecSys pipelines almost universally default to Adam/AdamW, with limited scrutiny of whether these choices are truly optimal for recommendation. In this work, we revisit optimizer design for scalable recommendation and introduce MuonRec, the first framework that brings the recently proposed Muon optimizer to RecSys training. Muon performs orthogonalized momentum updates for 2D weight matrices via Newton-Schulz iteration, promoting diverse update directions and improving optimization efficiency. We develop an open-source training recipe for recommendation models and evaluate it across both traditional sequential recommenders and modern generative recommenders. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MuonRec reduces converged training steps by an average of 32.4\% while simultaneously improving final ranking quality. Specifically, MuonRec yields consistent relative gains in NDCG@10, averaging 12.6\% across all settings, with particularly pronounced improvements in generative recommendation models. These results consistently outperform strong Adam/AdamW baselines, positioning Muon as a promising new optimizer standard for RecSys training. Our code is available.

cs.IR↗