arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.00652

Inference First, Training Underneath: Layer-Granular LoRA Co-Serving with LayerLoom

Abstract

Serving and fine-tuning a large language model on the same GPUs can turn the idle capacity between inference bursts into training progress, and low-rank adaptation (LoRA) makes this co-location cheap because both workloads read a single frozen copy of the base weights. The difficulty lies in the fine-tuning backward pass, which has no counterpart in inference. Current co-serving systems schedule backward work per serving iteration: each iteration carries a fixed backward budget, and requests that arrive in the meantime wait for it to finish, so fine-tuning dictates inference latency whenever load spikes. We observe that the backward pass of a LoRA microbatch decomposes into per-layer tasks over the same weights that the inference forward pass visits, which allows backward work to be scheduled at layer rather than iteration granularity. Building on this observation, LayerLoom attaches same-layer backward tasks to the inference forward pass and, at each layer, runs only as many of them as the latency slack of in-flight requests permits. To keep a ready task at every layer, LayerLoom maintains a wavefront of fine-tuning microbatches staggered across layers, and it bounds the wavefront's activation memory by offloading microbatch state to host memory and prefetching it ahead of the layer where the scheduler plans to use it. A fused kernel serves the paired forward and backward GEMMs from a single read of each base weight. Because all backward work of an iteration finishes within its forward pass, new requests join the next iteration as in continuous batching. On an RTX 4090 GPU running Llama-3.1-8B under a bursty production trace, LayerLoom raises joint SLO attainment by 13.5-21.8 points over prior works with fine-tuning throughput that is comparable or up to 12% higher, and it reaches the same training losses.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zongpu Zhang, Yishu Yin, Xuehai Qian. 2026-10-31. Inference First, Training Underneath: Layer-Granular LoRA Co-Serving with LayerLoom. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00652

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Subspace Node Pruning

Node pruning is the art of removing computational units such as neurons, filters, attention heads, or even entire layers to significantly reduce inference time while retaining network performance. In this work, we show that a broad family of importance measures, from activation-based to Fisher-based, share a common quadratic form. Through a lower-triangular change of basis, this form yields a pruning subspace in which entire nodes can be removed while the impact of the lost units is simultaneously recovered via linear least squares. Furthermore, the importance measures within our subspace are decoupled and additive through an orthogonalization of the layer activations, allowing multi-node pruning within layers without interference between importance scores. Our method, Subspace Node Pruning (SNP), outperforms the compared baselines on VGG-16 and ResNet-50 on ImageNet. On OPT-125M and LLaMA-2 7B, SNP matches the state-of-the-art LLM Surgeon at a 40-shot schedule and outperforms it whenever fewer shots are used, all without any retraining after pruning.

cs.LG↗

On the growth of the parameters of approximating ReLU neural networks

This work focuses on the analysis of fully connected feed forward ReLU neural networks as they approximate a given, smooth function. In contrast to conventionally studied universal approximation properties under increasing architectures, e.g., in terms of width or depth of the networks, we are concerned with the asymptotic growth of the parameters of approximating networks. Such results are of interest, e.g., for error analysis or consistency results for neural network training. The main result of our work is that, for a ReLU architecture with state of the art approximation error, the realizing parameters grow at most polynomially. The obtained rate with respect to a normalized network size is compared to existing results and is shown to be superior in most cases, in particular for high dimensional input.

cs.LG↗

Correlations Are Ruining Your Gradient Descent

Natural gradient descent, and the preconditioned optimizers which have followed from it, correct gradient descent by estimating curvature and applying its inverse to the gradient. For any single layer of a deep neural network, this correction can be shown to approximately separate into two factors: one which accounts for correlations in the gradient signal, and one which accounts for correlations in the data arriving at that layer. Herein we show that this second factor can be expressed as a change of basis rather than of curvature and, considered thus, it can be removed from the optimizer entirely and placed within the network itself. Specifically, we show that, once forward weights are corrected, right-sided natural gradient descent can be implemented in a form which has three exactly equivalent forms: a gradient preconditioner, a decorrelating linear transform in the forward pass, or a set of recurrent dynamics in which all updates are Hebbian and rely only upon locally available signals. The (recurrent) decorrelation method we discover aligns closely with proposed methods for inhibitory learning and homeostatic plasticity in the brain. Notably, our transform requires no matrix inverse, no matrix decomposition, and no information beyond that which is available at an individual synapse. It can therefore be applied in distributed and physically constrained systems, including neuromorphic hardware and nervous systems, where existing preconditioners cannot. We demonstrate its effectiveness empirically in convolutional and residual network models while significantly improving a range of approximate biologically plausible methods for credit assignment.

cs.LG↗