arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.41751

Latent-Lens: Visual Perception in Small Language Models Through Latent Communication

Mo Shahdloo·Faegheh Sardari·Mathew Salvaris
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Bridging independent vision-language models (VLMs) and small language models (SLMs) in a modular multi-agent system typically forces them to exchange information as discrete text, which creates a lossy bottleneck for spatial and fine-grained details. This constraint is especially acute for SLMs, whose limited capacity makes them more reliant on the quality of the input signal. Recent latent-communication methods exchange states between language models. How a VLM can pass visual information to a separately pretrained text-only SLM though remains unexplored. We propose \textbf{Latent-Lens}, a lightweight codec that bridges the representation gap between a frozen VLM and a frozen SLM directly in latent space, enabling them to communicate purely through hidden states. The codec consists of a domain encoder that projects hidden states from the VLM into the SLM's embedding space, and an attention decoder formalised as a LoRA that teaches the SLM to attend to these visual prefixes, while training only ${\sim}1.6$M parameters (0.2\% of the combined model size). On visual question answering (CLEVR, GQA), Latent-Lens achieves $81.0\pm7.9$\% and $65.4\pm5.4$\%, compared with $58.3\pm5.7$\% and $61.8\pm1.0$\% for text communication with the same LoRA budget (+30.2--69.8pp relative to frozen text communication), while on image captioning (Flickr8k) it improves over the same baseline by +16.5 (+18.8 frozen). We also evaluate Latent-Lens with TinyLlama-1.1B and InternVL2-1B, which use different architectures, vocabularies, and hidden dimensions.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mo Shahdloo, Faegheh Sardari, Mathew Salvaris. 2026-10-30. Latent-Lens: Visual Perception in Small Language Models Through Latent Communication. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41751

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Subspace Node Pruning

Node pruning is the art of removing computational units such as neurons, filters, attention heads, or even entire layers to significantly reduce inference time while retaining network performance. In this work, we show that a broad family of importance measures, from activation-based to Fisher-based, share a common quadratic form. Through a lower-triangular change of basis, this form yields a pruning subspace in which entire nodes can be removed while the impact of the lost units is simultaneously recovered via linear least squares. Furthermore, the importance measures within our subspace are decoupled and additive through an orthogonalization of the layer activations, allowing multi-node pruning within layers without interference between importance scores. Our method, Subspace Node Pruning (SNP), outperforms the compared baselines on VGG-16 and ResNet-50 on ImageNet. On OPT-125M and LLaMA-2 7B, SNP matches the state-of-the-art LLM Surgeon at a 40-shot schedule and outperforms it whenever fewer shots are used, all without any retraining after pruning.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

On the growth of the parameters of approximating ReLU neural networks

This work focuses on the analysis of fully connected feed forward ReLU neural networks as they approximate a given, smooth function. In contrast to conventionally studied universal approximation properties under increasing architectures, e.g., in terms of width or depth of the networks, we are concerned with the asymptotic growth of the parameters of approximating networks. Such results are of interest, e.g., for error analysis or consistency results for neural network training. The main result of our work is that, for a ReLU architecture with state of the art approximation error, the realizing parameters grow at most polynomially. The obtained rate with respect to a normalized network size is compared to existing results and is shown to be superior in most cases, in particular for high dimensional input.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Correlations Are Ruining Your Gradient Descent

Natural gradient descent, and the preconditioned optimizers which have followed from it, correct gradient descent by estimating curvature and applying its inverse to the gradient. For any single layer of a deep neural network, this correction can be shown to approximately separate into two factors: one which accounts for correlations in the gradient signal, and one which accounts for correlations in the data arriving at that layer. Herein we show that this second factor can be expressed as a change of basis rather than of curvature and, considered thus, it can be removed from the optimizer entirely and placed within the network itself. Specifically, we show that, once forward weights are corrected, right-sided natural gradient descent can be implemented in a form which has three exactly equivalent forms: a gradient preconditioner, a decorrelating linear transform in the forward pass, or a set of recurrent dynamics in which all updates are Hebbian and rely only upon locally available signals. The (recurrent) decorrelation method we discover aligns closely with proposed methods for inhibitory learning and homeostatic plasticity in the brain. Notably, our transform requires no matrix inverse, no matrix decomposition, and no information beyond that which is available at an individual synapse. It can therefore be applied in distributed and physically constrained systems, including neuromorphic hardware and nervous systems, where existing preconditioners cannot. We demonstrate its effectiveness empirically in convolutional and residual network models while significantly improving a range of approximate biologically plausible methods for credit assignment.

cs.LG↗