arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.41338

PRIN: A Perceptual-Structural Retinex-Inspired Network for Low-Light Image Enhancement

Qiyi Xie·Wei Chen Ng·Ziyao Li·Yuning Wu·Huasen Wu·Tianshi Miao·Jian Ding Tan
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Low-light image enhancement (LLIE) focuses not only on visibility recovery but also on preserving structurally meaningful content and perceptual naturalness. Existing learning-based methods may achieve favorable pixel-wise fidelity while still producing over-smoothed textures, color deviations, or spatially incoherent illumination. Retinex-inspired methods provide interpretable decomposition into reflectance and illumination components, however, the asymmetric restoration roles of these components are rarely encoded through branch-specific frequency-domain refinement. To address this issue, we propose a Perceptual-Structural Retinex-Inspired Network (PRIN), which integrates Retinex priors with restoration-role-aware enhancement. PRIN employs a shared encoder and asymmetric decoders to estimate reflectance and illumination components. The reflectance branch performs attention-guided and edge-aware wavelet refinement to preserve textures and boundaries, whereas the illumination branch promotes spatially coherent brightness adjustment. After the recomposition of reflectance and illumination branches, a curve-based post-composition enhancement head calibrates residual tone and exposure deviations. Experiments on LOL-v1, LOL-v2-Syn, and LOL-v2-Real show that the proposed network ties for the best structural similarity index (SSIM) and obtains the second-lowest learned perceptual image patch similarity (LPIPS) on LOL-v1, achieves the best SSIM and LPIPS on LOL-v2-Syn, and obtains the highest peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and the second-lowest LPIPS on LOL-v2-Real.

Explore related subjects

eess.IVcs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Qiyi Xie, Wei Chen Ng, Ziyao Li, Yuning Wu, Huasen Wu, Tianshi Miao, Jian Ding Tan. 2026-10-30. PRIN: A Perceptual-Structural Retinex-Inspired Network for Low-Light Image Enhancement. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41338

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Cyst-X: A Multicenter MRI Benchmark for Pancreatic Cyst Risk Stratification and Cross-Institutional AI

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are pancreatic cancer precursors, and guideline-based risk stratification both over-treats indolent lesions and misses progression. We present Cyst-X, a public benchmark of 1,461 T1-weighted (T1W) and T2-weighted (T2W) MRI volumes from 764 patients at seven centers, with expert pancreas masks, risk labels, splits and reference AI risk-prediction models. PanSegNet segmented the pancreas with Dice of 86.34% (T1W) and 89.26% (T2W) on held-out centers. For the primary task, high-risk versus low-risk IPMN, a 3D DenseNet-121 achieved cross-validated AUCs of 74.59% and 73.45%; complementary broad binary and three-class tasks reached 78.67--81.28% and 73.47--75.76%. Because patient images often cannot be pooled across institutions, we also simulated federated learning across the seven centers. On T2W MRI, FedProx was similar to centralized training in center-averaged external AUC (71.00% versus 71.18%) but not in pooled AUC (62.35% versus 77.49%). Radiologist comparisons showed cohort-dependent sensitivity--specificity tradeoffs. Cyst-X supports reproducible method development and identifies within-IPMN risk discrimination and cross-center score comparability as open challenges.

eess.IV↗
arXiv2026

Beyond Visibility: Real-Time Surface Accessibility Fields from Sparse LiDAR

Understanding which surfaces a given tool can physically access is fundamental to robotic interaction, yet 3D perception typically stops at geometric reconstruction or visibility estimation. Visibility does not imply accessibility: a visible point may still be blocked by tool geometry or approach-corridor clearance. We propose the Accessibility Field: a per-point surface accessibility labelling, computed from streaming sparse LiDAR and updated at sensor rate as the platform moves. Our GPU-based method evaluates surface points against precomputed tool-geometry kernels across rotated approach orientations, underpinned by a scan-centric TSDF integration scheme suited to non-repetitive sensors such as the Livox Mid-360. The system is tool-agnostic, requires no prior scene model, and runs in real time on both workstation and Jetson Orin edge hardware. On synthetic primitives, our method achieves F1=90.8%, against 69.8% for a Hidden Point Removal baseline; ablations within our own pipeline give 81.5% replacing the TSDF query with a point-cloud collision check, and 33.9% replacing scan-centric integration with projective, nvblox-style integration. On a mature synthetic Pinus radiata model, the method labels 56.8% of visible pine branch surfaces as physically inaccessible.

eess.IV↗
arXiv2026

Forecasting Brain Tracer Distribution from Pre-Contrast MRI: A Comparison of Direct Regression and Flow Matching

The brain fluid clearance system can be studied with intrathecal contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). By injecting a tracer into the spinal canal and performing MRI over 24--48\,h, one can measure how a tracer injected into the cerebrospinal fluid spreads through the brain. As this is an invasive procedure requiring several MRI scans, we ask how much of the later tracer distribution can be predicted from the pre-contrast scan and elapsed time alone. Using 104 training patients (878 MRI volumes), we compared a direct image-to-image regression model with a more complex generative model based on conditional flow matching, and tested both on 23 held-out patients and on 51 patients from a separate cohort with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Relative to simply copying the pre-contrast scan, the direct model reduced the mean absolute error (intensities normalized to $[0,1]$) from 0.089 to 0.036, about 60\%, in held-out patients and from 0.075 to 0.056, about 25\%, in the iNPH cohort. The reduction held in every sampled elapsed-time interval and brain compartment, and errors remained largest at 20--30\,h and in the ventricles, where enhancement is strongest. Its predicted change maps agreed with the observed tracer enhancement rather than only reproducing anatomy. The generative model was less accurate in both cohorts. A substantial part of the later tracer distribution is therefore predictable from the patient's brain anatomy as seen on pre-contrast MRI, and the added model complexity gave no benefit at this data scale. Whether this accuracy suffices for a given clinical use remains to be established; with prospective validation, such forecasts could help simplify the MRI protocol used to assess brain clearance.

eess.IV↗