arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.40732

Don't Just Impute, Detect: Task-Aware Diffusion Pipelines for Edge Anomaly Detection

Abstract

Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) edge pipelines routinely lose contiguous blocks of multi-sensor data to network dropouts and hardware faults. The standard remedy is a disjointed "impute-then-detect" pipeline whose imputer is trained only for Mean Squared Error (MSE). Such an imputer fills a missing block with the most probable normal pattern: a partially observed anomaly is smoothed back toward normality, and boundary artifacts on normal data raise false alarms. We call this imputation bias and propose the Task-Aware Diffusion Refiner (TADR), a conditional diffusion refiner trained against the loss landscape of a frozen downstream detector. Because back-propagating through the sampling trajectory is intractable, the task-aware terms act on the one-step clean-window estimate that the noise prediction already yields, so training costs no more than plain diffusion training. Under strict Point-to-Point evaluation over five seeds with paired significance tests, TADR raises F1 by $0.338$ over the unrefined detector on SMD ($p = 0.0015$), and the anomaly enhancement objective alone contributes $0.463$ in ablation. We also characterise when the method helps: the gain tracks the continuous, mutually redundant channels available and the anomaly evidence the outage removes, and it is absent on telemetry datasets dominated by one-hot command channels and on PSM. At ten sampling steps TADR runs in $41.4$ ms per window on a single CPU core, sustaining about $24$ concurrent 1 Hz streams from a $4.03$ MB model. Code and per-seed results are available at https://github.com/int-park422/TADR.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jeongsu Park, Taehyeon Yun, Geonwoo Kim, Yuji Lim, Moohong Min. 2026-10-29. Don't Just Impute, Detect: Task-Aware Diffusion Pipelines for Edge Anomaly Detection. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40732

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Subspace Node Pruning

Node pruning is the art of removing computational units such as neurons, filters, attention heads, or even entire layers to significantly reduce inference time while retaining network performance. In this work, we show that a broad family of importance measures, from activation-based to Fisher-based, share a common quadratic form. Through a lower-triangular change of basis, this form yields a pruning subspace in which entire nodes can be removed while the impact of the lost units is simultaneously recovered via linear least squares. Furthermore, the importance measures within our subspace are decoupled and additive through an orthogonalization of the layer activations, allowing multi-node pruning within layers without interference between importance scores. Our method, Subspace Node Pruning (SNP), outperforms the compared baselines on VGG-16 and ResNet-50 on ImageNet. On OPT-125M and LLaMA-2 7B, SNP matches the state-of-the-art LLM Surgeon at a 40-shot schedule and outperforms it whenever fewer shots are used, all without any retraining after pruning.

cs.LG↗

On the growth of the parameters of approximating ReLU neural networks

This work focuses on the analysis of fully connected feed forward ReLU neural networks as they approximate a given, smooth function. In contrast to conventionally studied universal approximation properties under increasing architectures, e.g., in terms of width or depth of the networks, we are concerned with the asymptotic growth of the parameters of approximating networks. Such results are of interest, e.g., for error analysis or consistency results for neural network training. The main result of our work is that, for a ReLU architecture with state of the art approximation error, the realizing parameters grow at most polynomially. The obtained rate with respect to a normalized network size is compared to existing results and is shown to be superior in most cases, in particular for high dimensional input.

cs.LG↗

Correlations Are Ruining Your Gradient Descent

Natural gradient descent, and the preconditioned optimizers which have followed from it, correct gradient descent by estimating curvature and applying its inverse to the gradient. For any single layer of a deep neural network, this correction can be shown to approximately separate into two factors: one which accounts for correlations in the gradient signal, and one which accounts for correlations in the data arriving at that layer. Herein we show that this second factor can be expressed as a change of basis rather than of curvature and, considered thus, it can be removed from the optimizer entirely and placed within the network itself. Specifically, we show that, once forward weights are corrected, right-sided natural gradient descent can be implemented in a form which has three exactly equivalent forms: a gradient preconditioner, a decorrelating linear transform in the forward pass, or a set of recurrent dynamics in which all updates are Hebbian and rely only upon locally available signals. The (recurrent) decorrelation method we discover aligns closely with proposed methods for inhibitory learning and homeostatic plasticity in the brain. Notably, our transform requires no matrix inverse, no matrix decomposition, and no information beyond that which is available at an individual synapse. It can therefore be applied in distributed and physically constrained systems, including neuromorphic hardware and nervous systems, where existing preconditioners cannot. We demonstrate its effectiveness empirically in convolutional and residual network models while significantly improving a range of approximate biologically plausible methods for credit assignment.

cs.LG↗