arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.40650

When Does Storage Complement Solar? Investment and Cost Recovery under Advanced Net Metering

Abstract

We examine the joint PV and storage operational and investment decisions of a prosumer under net energy metering (NEM) and peak/off-peak tariffs. Legacy NEM compensates net exports at the retail rate over a netting period, typically under time-invariant pricing. To better reflect system costs, tariff features are being reconsidered, with many U.S. states adopting time-varying prices and export compensation below the retail price. We formulate the prosumer decision problem as a cost minimization problem with charge/discharge, PV investment, and storage investment decisions. We analytically derive the optimal decisions based on the tariff's membership in one of six regions that partition the tariff space. Using these solutions, we examine the relationship between PV and storage, identifying when they are complements or substitutes. Furthermore, we identify the relationship between private DER incentives and the distribution utility's (DU's) net cost of serving the prosumer. For both storage and PV, when investment costs are greater than the costs of serving the customer, there is no tariff where investment in PV and storage decrease non-adopter bills. Under the same conditions, complementarity between PV and storage decreases DU cost recovery for a given tariff. In a Massachusetts-based case study, we validate our theoretical findings by connecting tariff design features to DER interaction, the DU's net cost, and DER adoption in a stochastic, multi-prosumer, and multi-period setting.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nathan Engelman Lado, Ahmed Alahmed, Audun Botterud, Saurabh Amin. 2026-10-29. When Does Storage Complement Solar? Investment and Cost Recovery under Advanced Net Metering. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40650

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Did a feedback mechanism between propositional and prescriptive knowledge create modern growth?

Joel Mokyr has argued that self-sustained modern growth originated from a feedback loop between propositional (theoretical) and prescriptive (applied) knowledge that turned positive during the eighteenth century "Industrial Enlightenment". This paper presents the first quantitative test of whether such a feedback loop existed. For this, it introduces new text-based measures for 1) the innovativeness of publications and 2) knowledge spillovers. It then applies them to ca. 300,000 English publication titles and short patent descriptions, 1600--1800. The paper finds that a feedback loop between propositional and prescriptive knowledge became positive by the mid-eighteenth century, supporting Mokyr's original hypothesis.

econ.GN↗

Market-Based Probability of Stock Returns

This paper describes the dependence of market-based statistical moments of returns on statistical moments and correlations of the current and past trade values. We use Markowitz's definition of value weighted return of a portfolio as the definition of market-based average return of trades during the averaging period. Then we derive the dependence of market-based volatility and higher statistical moments of returns on statistical moments, volatilities, and correlations of the current and past trade values. We derive the approximations of the characteristic function and the probability of returns by a finite number q of market-based statistical moments. To forecast market-based average and volatility of returns at horizon T, one should predict the first two statistical moments and correlation of current and past trade values at the same horizon. We discuss the economic reasons that limit the number of predicted statistical moments of returns by the first two. That limits the accuracy of the forecasts of probability of returns by the accuracy of the Gaussian approximations. To improve the reliability of large macroeconomic and market models like BlackRock's Aladdin, JP Morgan, and the U.S. Fed., the developers should use market-based statistical moments of returns.

econ.GN↗

Pay and Beyond: The Evolving Rewards for AI Skills

This study examines the monetary and non-monetary rewards advertised in job vacancies requiring artificial intelligence skills in the U.S. labor market. Using approximately ten million online job vacancies posted between 2018 and 2025, we examine the development of AI demand, wage premia, and non-monetary benefits, including tuition assistance, paid leave, health and well-being programs, parental leave, inclusive workplace language, and remote work, across firms of different sizes. We find that demand for AI skills increased sharply following the introduction of generative AI in late 2022 across small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), large firms, and S&P 500 firms, while AI wage premia rose most strongly among SMEs. AI vacancies are significantly more likely than comparable non-AI roles to advertise non-monetary benefits, particularly remote work, inclusive culture, and parental leave. This premium is strongest among SMEs and large firms, but weaker among S&P 500 firms. Finally, we show that the relationship between wages and benefits shifted after the spread of generative AI: whereas complementarity between high wages and benefits was previously concentrated among S&P 500 firms, and substitution among SMEs, the difference across firm sizes has attenuated. Our findings indicate that the increased demand for AI skills has been accompanied by changes in compensation patterns beyond pay, as employers across the size distribution combine monetary and non-monetary rewards to recruit AI-skilled workers.

econ.GN↗