arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.39828

SpeakerTurn: Target-Speaker Semantic Turn Detection in Multi-Speaker Environments

Nan Li·Hetao Shan·Jintao Liang·Jiahao Yan·Longbiao Wang·Tubin Huang·Min Xu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Semantic completeness alone cannot determine when an assistant should respond in a multi-speaker environment: a completed utterance may belong to an interfering speaker, while the designated user is still speaking, acknowledging, or requesting time. We therefore study semantic turn inference conditioned on speaker identity. We propose SpeakerTurn, a framework that jointly predicts the target transcript and turn state from a speech mixture and an independent target-speaker reference. Built on CocktailASR-1, it links semantic decisions to the corresponding target content through joint supervision, distinguishing complete, incomplete, backchannel, wait, and target-absent states, with a separate interruption task. We also examine whether structured chain-of-thought (CoT) supervision improves decisions by representing speaker presence and semantic cues. On a synthetic multi-speaker test set, SpeakerTurn achieves five-state macro F1 of 0.811 and target-transcription character error rate (CER) of 4.20%, correctly resolving all ten reference-swapped interruption pairs. Joint-format transcription and native-interface recognition nevertheless behave differently, and CoT improves validation transcription without improving turn macro F1. These results show why target attribution, semantic turn discrimination, and recognition retention require separate assessment when adapting speech language models for speaker-conditioned interaction.

Explore related subjects

eess.AS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nan Li, Hetao Shan, Jintao Liang, Jiahao Yan, Longbiao Wang, Tubin Huang, Min Xu. 2026-10-29. SpeakerTurn: Target-Speaker Semantic Turn Detection in Multi-Speaker Environments. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.39828

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

NVV-Locator: From Transcript Tags to Acoustic Boundaries for Fine-Grained Nonverbal Vocalization Grounding

Human speech includes nonverbal vocalizations (NVVs), such as laughter, sighs, breaths, and coughs, which convey affective and interactional information. Existing approaches typically represent NVVs as transcript-level tags, providing limited supervision for their waveform-time boundaries. We present NVV-Locator for fine-grained NVV temporal grounding. We first unify 26 NVV categories across public resources and construct large-scale timestamp-supervised training data through dual-LLM verification, transcript-guided forced alignment, and energy-based boundary refinement. We further introduce NVV-TimeBench, an expert-refined benchmark with 667 utterances and 1,094 events. NVV-Locator uses a non-autoregressive slot-filling architecture to jointly predict lexical timestamps, NVV categories, and event boundaries. On NVV-TimeBench, it achieves 71.0% Micro F1, 70.2% Macro F1, 80.4% Macro mIoU, and 59.6 ms Macro mMAE, outperforming the evaluated large audio model counterparts. Evaluation on an external corpus further demonstrates the cross-corpus generalization of NVV-Locator.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

Attendance-guided speaker enrollment across meetings

Speaker-aware applications rely on enrolled voice profiles, yet collecting enrollment speech from every participant is impractical. Meeting archives provide an alternative source of enrollment speech, comprising recordings of recurring participants paired with expected attendance lists. We investigate whether expected attendance lists can be cross-referenced with diarized anonymous speaker clusters to identify reliable enrollment speech for recurring participants. The resulting task, multi-participant automatic enrollment, must accommodate two types of attendance noise: a listed participant may not speak, and a speaker may be unlisted. To this end, we introduce a benchmark for the task: a synthetic corpus calibrated to an in-house meeting corpus, paired with a contamination-sensitive evaluation protocol. The reference method we introduce scores cross-session cluster chains against expected-attendance patterns and abstains when the evidence is insufficient. We quantify the reference method's benchmark performance as a trade-off between enrollment success and contamination. Applying synthetic-development thresholds unchanged to real meetings exposes a synthetic-to-real gap that remains an open challenge. We will release the benchmark generator and evaluation code.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

VeriSpoof: Beyond Real or Fake with One Audio LLM

A speech deepfake detector estimates whether a recording is synthetic, but a forensic analyst also asks which system produced it, whether recordings share a source, and what evidence supports each conclusion. We present VeriSpoof, an audio language model that unifies five tasks with shared weights: deepfake detection, generator attribution (generator, acoustic model and vocoder), recording-condition analysis, synthesized-span localisation, and source verification. Each decision is supported by grounded rationales whose statements can be independently verified. Answers are scored by sentence likelihood, allowing detection and source verification to be thresholded without separate heads. Rationale statements can be checked against waveform measurements, span labels, or generator metadata. Counterfactual examples train decisions to follow the stated evidence. Across the 14 Speech-DF-Arena test sets, VeriSpoof-Plus achieves 2.14% pooled EER, ranking third of 28 systems and first among open-weight systems. VeriSpoof-Base, trained only on official training splits of eight corpora, achieves 4.43% EER, less than half that of the next open-weight detector. With the same weights, VeriSpoof-Plus verifies whether recordings from generators unseen in training share a source at 6.2% EER. Controlled studies show that the audio representation governs detection, the LLM governs recording comparison, and source supervision is necessary for neural-codec fakes. Statement-checkable rationales catch partial fakes missed by one-step answers (99.6% vs. 78.4% on PartialEdit) and determine decisions under edits unseen in training (99.5%). Training updates only 29.7M of 2.85B parameters, fitting a single 24 GB GPU with gradient checkpointing. We release both models, inference code, a demo, and VeriSpoof-Bench, the evaluation suite covering these questions.

eess.AS↗