arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.37269

Personal preference or system role? Battery swapping among UK electric vehicle users

Janak Parmar·Huseyin Ayan·Dilum Dissanayake·Margaret Bell
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Battery swapping replaces a depleted EV battery with a charged one, reducing waiting time and enabling off-peak charging. Evidence on acceptance, however, remains concentrated in Asian markets, and most studies examine individual adoption intentions. This study asks whether current UK EV users judge swapping differently as a purchase option and as a technology for the transport system. Using Behavioural Reasoning Theory, an integrated choice and latent variable model, and latent class analysis, we analyse perceived usefulness, energy-system concerns, practical barriers, and satisfaction with current charging. Usefulness and energy-system concerns relate more strongly to expectations about the system. Battery compatibility and station coverage relate more strongly to personal preference, while spare battery costs relate to expectations about network viability. User groups differ in how they balance benefits, barriers, and satisfaction with existing charging. Policy should address driver barriers and network viability as distinct but connected priorities.

Explore related subjects

econ.EMstat.AP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Janak Parmar, Huseyin Ayan, Dilum Dissanayake, Margaret Bell. 2026-10-27. Personal preference or system role? Battery swapping among UK electric vehicle users. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37269

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Valid Post-Contextual Bandit Inference

Contextual multi-armed bandits (CMAB) are increasingly used as adaptively sampled experiments, after which researchers test hypotheses about treatment effects. We derive the Hájek-Le Cam limit experiment for multi-armed contextual bandits under equal-arms (weak-signal) asymptotics. It is Locally Asymptotically Quadratic, but not a (mixed) Gaussian shift experiment. Girsanov's theorem gives it a structural representation in stochastic differential equations. Together with a general weak convergence result, this yields the asymptotic null distribution and local asymptotic power of often-used test statistics. Two kinds of nuisance parameters threaten size control: the common reward level of the arms of interest and the rewards of the arms not of interest. The first threat is removed by translation-invariant sampling. We propose Regularized Translation-Invariant (RTI) versions of Thompson, tempered-greedy, tempered-(Lin)UCB, and exploration sampling. The second threat calls for appropriate pivots. The structural representation of the limit experiment is key to overcome the inferential challenges arising from adaptive sampling. Simulations corroborate the theory.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Evaluating A/B Testing Methodologies via Sample Splitting: Theory and Practice

We develop a theoretical framework for sample splitting in A/B testing environments, where data for each test are partitioned into two splits to measure methodological performance when the true impacts of tests are unobserved. We show that sample-split estimators are generally biased for full-sample performance but consistently estimate sample-split analogues of it. We derive their asymptotic distributions, construct valid confidence intervals, and characterize the bias-variance trade-offs underlying sample-split design choices. We validate our theoretical results through simulations and provide implementation guidance for A/B testing products seeking to evaluate new estimators and decision rules.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

On the Use of Design-Based Simulations

Design-based simulations hold outcomes fixed and generate variation by resampling treatment assignment or shocks. They can be used in both methodological and applied work to assess inference procedures. However, their informativeness for these uses is not straightforward. We show that, when treatment effects are nonzero, these simulations can be misleading about spatial or serial correlation in clustered experiments, difference-in-differences, and shift-share designs. We analyze alternatives and formalize how these simulations can reveal features of the error distribution despite holding outcomes fixed. Finally, we consider limitations in the use of design-based simulations to select among different inference methods in applied work.

econ.EM↗