The Edge Geodesic Transversal Problem

R. Prabha; B. Sandhiya; Paul Manuel

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.36821

The Edge Geodesic Transversal Problem

R. Prabha·B. Sandhiya·Paul Manuel

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

For a given connected graph $G(V,E)$, the geodesic transversal problem finds a set $S$ of vertices of $G$ with minimum cardinality such that every maximal geodesic of $G$ contains at least one vertex of $S$. The cardinality of such a smallest set $S$ is called the gt-number of $G$ and is denoted as $gt(G)$. In this paper, we introduce the \textit{Edge geodesic transversal problem} as the edge-based extension of the geodesic transversal problem. The problem of determining a set $S\subseteq E(G)$ with minimum number of elements such that every maximal geodesic $P$ in $G$ traverses at least one edge of $S$ is called the edge geodesic transversal problem, and the cardinality of such a set is called the edge geodesic transversal number or the $gt_e$-number of $G$, denoted as $gt_e(G)$. Further, we investigate the effect of an edge cut of a graph on the edge geodesic transversal problem and prove a novel result called the edge cut transversal theorem which is used in the computation of edge geodesic transversal number of hypercube, stacked prism and ladder graph.

Explore related subjects

math.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

R. Prabha, B. Sandhiya, Paul Manuel. 2026-10-27. The Edge Geodesic Transversal Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36821

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Domination in Johnson graphs J(n, 3) for odd n

In 2025 Cornet, Dravec, and Torres determined the domination number $γ(J(n,3))$ of the Johnson graph for every even $n \ge 6$, expressing it as a closed form $ϕ_n$ in terms of Fort-Hedlund covering numbers, and conjectured the same value for odd $n$. We prove this conjecture: $γ(J(n,3)) = ϕ_n$ for every odd $n \ge 7$. A dominating set of $J(n,3)$ is the same as a lotto design $\mathrm{LD}(n,3,3,2)$, and the lotto numbers $L(n,3,3,2)$, and hence $γ(J(n,3))$, were already determined for every $n$ by Bate (1978) and by Brouwer (1981); a short degree argument of Füredi, Székely, and Zubor (1996) gives the same lower bound for all $n \not\equiv 9, 10 \pmod{12}$. The contribution of this paper is therefore a new proof of the odd case, carried out within the bijective framework of Cornet, Dravec, and Torres.

math.CO↗

arXiv2026

HJ numbers revisited

Hales-Jewett theorem is well known. We prove a primitive recursive bound, in fact an $\clE^5$ one, for the density version. In preparation we deal with what was the main induction step in the old proof of Hales-Jewett as a result in its own right with better bounds. Also in improving our bounds.

math.CO↗

arXiv2026

Adjacency-degree algebras and spectral determination of graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with adjacency matrix $A$ and degree matrix $D$. Applying $A$ and $D$ repeatedly to the all-ones vector produces a space $M_G$ of functions on the vertices, and these functions are constant on the orbits of the automorphism group. We call $G$ AD-observable if $M_G$ contains the indicator vector of every orbit, and AD-separable if the functions in $M_G$ separate the orbits. Forests are AD-observable, by McKay's leaf-pruning argument. Our main result is that for every cograph, $M_G$ is spanned by the indicator vectors of the cells of the stable partition of color refinement. Hence a cograph is AD-observable, or equivalently AD-separable, exactly when color refinement finds its orbits, and we describe these cographs by their cotrees. We also show that two cographs with the same number of vertices and the same homomorphism counts from all caterpillars have the same counts from all trees. The main result does not extend to distance-hereditary graphs: we give two such graphs on nine vertices that are AD-separable but not AD-observable.

math.CO↗