arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.36361

HELICS: Biobank-scale Conditional Synthetic Genome Generation via Latent Flow Matching

Abstract

Individual-level genotype data underpin genetic discovery, disease-risk modeling, and therapeutic development, yet many critical settings remain data-limited, including underrepresented ancestries, rare or imbalanced disease cohorts, and restricted-access biobanks. Conditional synthetic genome generation would support privacy-aware benchmarking, simulation, and data augmentation, but requires learning an ultra-high-dimensional discrete distribution over hundreds of thousands to tens of millions of correlated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), or sites of DNA variation. We introduce HELICS: High-fidelity gEneration via Latent Interpolant Conditional Synthesis, a phasing-free latent flow matching framework for genome-wide SNP-level generation from biobank-scale genotype data. HELICS tokenizes chromosomes with convolutional autoencoders, reducing >600K SNPs to 4,096 continuous latent tokens, and trains a transformer parameterized conditional flow matching model over the concatenated multi-chromosome latent representation. Trained on over 417K genomes in the UK Biobank, HELICS generates genome-wide common-variant synthetic cohorts without haplotype phasing and achieves stronger fidelity to real genotypes than existing haplotype-based simulators, including high allele-frequency agreement in external evaluation and superior preservation of local and long-range SNP correlation structure. Conditioning on ancestry and genetic liability summaries enables targeted generation across genetic risk profiles; in perturbation analyses, by increasing the conditioned disease trait liability, HELICS induces SNP-level dosage changes in generated genomes that are highly correlated with published association weights. HELICS provides a scalable generative modeling framework for SNP-level genome data and a path toward conditional synthetic cohorts for data-limited genetic studies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ahmad Abdel-Azim, Xihong Lin. 2026-10-26. HELICS: Biobank-scale Conditional Synthetic Genome Generation via Latent Flow Matching. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36361

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Enhancing Clinical Classifier Robustness with Deep Representation Learning Based OOD Detection on DNA Methylation Data

DNA methylation (DNAM) array-based tumor classification is a powerful clinical diagnostic tool, but models trained on fixed reference cohorts can produce faulty predictions for tumor types not represented in the training distribution. We propose an end-to-end deep representation learning-based out-of-distribution (OOD) detection framework for DNAm array data. Deep neural network (DNN) classifiers were trained on public sarcoma (SARC) (GSE140686) and brain tumor (BT) (GSE90496) cohorts, and feature vectors were extracted from bottleneck layers. Five OOD methods, including 1dimension (1D)-Subspace Analysis (1D-SSA), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Ridge Regression, Mahalanobis Distance (MD), and Sum of Squared Distances (SSD), were explored with 200 and 500-dimensional embeddings. Spectral discrepancy was used to discriminate in-distribution (IND) from OOD samples. Performance was measured via cross-validation, holdout samples, and an independent clinical dataset. 1D-SSA was the most effective approach. In the sarcoma-IND/brain tumor-OOD setting, the framework achieved an AUROC of 0.975 and True Negative Rate (TNR)@95TPR of 0.930, and an AUROC of 0.9569 and TNR@95TPR of 0.8660 for the brain tumor-IND/sarcoma-OOD setting. On the independent clinical test set, the method yielded a mean AUROC of 0.976, a DE of 0.032, an FPR@95TPR of 0.065, and a TNR@95TPR of 0.935. These results show deep representation-based OOD detection as a practical quality-control layer for clinical-grade methylation-based tumor classification systems.

q-bio.GN↗

OmicsLM: A Multimodal Large Language Model for Multi-Sample Omics Reasoning

Large language models can reason over biological knowledge, but they are not naturally equipped to work with quantitative omics measurements. Existing approaches either convert expression profiles into long textual representations, often losing quantitative information, or connect omics encoders to language models for narrow tasks. We introduce OmicsLM, a 9B multimodal language model that represents each bulk or single-cell transcriptome as a compact continuous embedding that can be interleaved with natural-language instructions and with other samples in the same context. An key contribution is a training corpus that connects experimental measurements with biological knowledge and task supervision. We combine templates linking transcriptomic profiles to annotations and experimental outcomes, reasoning examples connecting evidence across sources, and LLM-generated supervision with task-specific quality checks. The instruction-tuning corpus spans 157 biological and general-purpose task groups. Training includes continued pretraining on 20 billion tokens and supervised fine-tuning on 5.21 million conversations. We further introduce GEO-OmicsQA, a publication-disjoint benchmark of 3,000 questions requiring models to interpret and compare expression profiles from real GEO studies. OmicsLM achieves the best results among the evaluated models on three of four held-out annotation tasks and on all six GEO-OmicsQA variants, and the best average performance among compared methods on PerturbQA perturbation-response prediction. Ablations show a clear advantage for continuous omics representations over a text-only gene-list representation. Together, these results show that quantitative transcriptomic measurements and biological language can be integrated within a general conversational model, enabling both predictive tasks and language-guided interpretation of experimental samples.

q-bio.GN↗

Benchmarking miRNA Target Prediction Methods

Background: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) regulate gene expression by binding to target mRNAs. Although many tools predict miRNA-target interactions, predictions show limited concordance, and benchmarks relying on curated databases may be biased by overlap with tool-development data. Methods: We benchmarked seven tools (TargetScan, miRDB, miRmap, DIANA-microT, RNA22, miRWalk, and mirDIP) across approximately 59.7 million candidate miRNA-mRNA pairs. Each pair received an evidence-graded reference score (0-3) combining validated interactions from miRTarBase and TarBase with expression-derived evidence from paired miRNA-seq and mRNA-seq data in an induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) cohort of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and control lines. Performance was evaluated using Type I error, statistical power, and false discovery proportion (FDP). Robustness was assessed by increasing reference-score stringency (truth signal) and including progressively lower-confidence predictions (model signal). Optimal cutoffs maximized Youden's J statistic. Results: Rankings were largely consistent across settings. TargetScan and miRDB maintained Type I error rates below 0.05, with TargetScan showing the lowest FDP, but both had limited power. mirDIP achieved the highest power at the cost of the highest Type I error rate. At optimal cutoffs, mirDIP best balanced sensitivity and specificity (Youden's J = 0.566), followed by DIANA-microT (J = 0.481); miRWalk and RNA22 had FDPs near the random-prediction baseline. No tool was optimal across all metrics; tool and cutoff selection should reflect whether sensitivity or specificity is prioritized."""

q-bio.GN↗