arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.35986

Leveraging US Commercial Adjustments: MFN Tariffs and Trade Diversion

Maria Cipollina·Luca De Benedictis
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Most-favored-nation (MFN) tariff increases do more than raise trade costs. By changing the relative tariff treatment of competing exporters, they increase the value of existing trade preferences, reshaping relative market access and trade allocation. While the trade-reducing effects of higher tariffs are well established, much less is known about this mechanism. We investigate whether higher MFN tariffs amplify the competitive advantage of preferential partners, generating trade diversion. Using domestic and international trade data, we estimate a structural gravity model with CES-consistent bilateral tariff margins and examine recent changes in US trade policy as an empirical application. We find that higher MFN protection simultaneously reduces imports and redirects trade toward preferential exporters. These effects are highly heterogeneous across sectors and regions, with the largest losses concentrated in intermediate and capital goods, highlighting the role of MFN tariffs in reshaping relative market access and global trade patterns.

Explore related subjects

econ.GNq-fin.EC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maria Cipollina, Luca De Benedictis. 2026-10-26. Leveraging US Commercial Adjustments: MFN Tariffs and Trade Diversion. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35986

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Matching-LLM: Historically Anchored Synthetic Prediction of Public Opinion and Elections

Large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities for predicting public opinion and electoral behavior, but their synthetic responses may not fully reflect human attitudes and heterogeneity. This study introduces Matching-LLM, a weighted framework that combines LLM-generated responses with historical human behavioral data. Using the World Values Survey, American National Election Studies, and German election survey data, we evaluate its performance in reconstructing survey responses and predicting election outcomes. Results show that Matching-LLM generally improves accuracy relative to LLM-only, including 11 of 12 comparisons on survey questions excluded from calibration, although it does not consistently outperform History-only. In the 2024 U.S. presidential election, Matching-LLM predicts 310 Republican electoral votes, compared with the actual 312, outperforming both single-source benchmarks in electoral-vote accuracy. A supplementary German application extends the framework to a multiparty setting. Overall, the findings highlight the potential of historical data to improve LLM-based predictions while emphasizing the importance of task-specific validation.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Narratives to Numbers: Large Language Models and Economic Policy Uncertainty

We study the implications of adopting machine-generated data in economic analysis. Rather than taking the data-generating process as given and correcting estimates econometrically, we evaluate how upstream modeling and researcher choices shape downstream estimates. Revisiting the Economic Policy Uncertainty index, we find that large language models fine-tuned on human audit labels identify nearly twice as many auditor-flagged articles as keyword-based alternatives and are robust to noisy text and linguistic drift. Varying classifier, threshold, and aggregation choices produces substantial differences not only in performance but in what the index captures, reshaping the relationship between policy uncertainty and returns.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Practice Makes Perfect: Tacit Knowledge, Generative AI, and Returns to Schooling and Experience

Generative AI changes the scarcity of different forms of human capital. It makes codified knowledge cheaply available at the point of production, while judgment acquired through practice remains tied more closely to the worker. We ask what this does to two familiar prices in the wage structure: the return to schooling and the return to experience. In a short-run framework, machine-supplied codified knowledge substitutes directly for the codified component of worker human capital, lowering the schooling gradient. If codified and practice-based knowledge are complements, the return to experience rises where learning through practice is fastest; technology-specific experience can also become obsolete, rotating the experience profile rather than shifting it uniformly. Using US Current Population Survey earnings data from 2018 through June 2026, we compare occupations in the top and bottom quartiles of the pre-ChatGPT Felten-Raj-Seamans exposure index. After the public release of ChatGPT, the return to a year of schooling falls by 0.55 log points in exposed occupations. The return to a year of experience rises by 0.26 log points at three years of potential experience, is unchanged at fifteen, and falls by 0.12 log points at twenty-five; under the baseline quadratic, the effect crosses zero at 18.1 years. These breaks appear with the release, disappear under a pandemic placebo, survive a common censoring rule across the full sample, and remain when each occupation is allowed its own pre-shock schooling and experience gradients. The pattern is a repricing of human capital inside exposed occupations: codifiable knowledge becomes less scarce, while the value of experience depends increasingly on whether it transfers to the new technology.

econ.GN↗