arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.35131

From Linear to Polylogarithmic: Dynamic Submodular Maximization over Matroids

Abstract

We study the problem of submodular maximization under a matroid constraint. In this problem, there is a monotone submodular function $f: 2^{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+$ and a matroid $M(N, I)$, accessible via value and independence oracles and the goal is to find the independent set $S \in I$ maximizing the objective function, i.e., $f(S) = \max_{I \in I} f(I)$. In the fully dynamic setting, the active ground set $N \subseteq N$ evolves through element insertions and deletions. The goal is to maintain a solution $S \subseteq N$ with $S \in I$ and $f(S) = \max_{I \subseteq N,, I \in I} f(I)$ after each update. Two approximation algorithms have been proposed to solve this problem: Dütting et al. developed a $(4+ε)$-approximation algorithm with an expected amortized update time of $O\!\bigl(\frac{k^2}ε \log k \log n \log^3 \frac{k}ε\bigr)$, and Banihashem et al. achieved a similar approximation with a better update time $O\!\bigl(k \log k \log^3 \frac{k}ε\bigr)$. However, these methods both become inefficient when the rank $k$ of the matroid is large (e.g., when $k = n^{o(1)}$). The central open question in this line of work is whether a fully dynamic algorithm with polylogarithmic update time exists. We resolve this question by presenting the first fully dynamic algorithm for submodular maximization over matroids with polylogarithmic update time. Our algorithm maintains a $(4+ε)$-approximate solution with expected amortized update time $poly(\log n, ε^{-1})$, where $n = |N|$. In particular, the update time is independent of the matroid rank $k$, thereby eliminating the dependence on $k$ and settling the open problem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kiarash Banihashem, Samira Goudarzi, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Peyman Jabbarzade, Morteza Monemizadeh. 2026-10-26. From Linear to Polylogarithmic: Dynamic Submodular Maximization over Matroids. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35131

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Online Multi-Level Aggregation with Maximum Delay

We study Multi-Level Aggregation with Maximum Delay (MLA-MD) on finite weighted rooted trees. Each service pays for a rooted subtree and for the maximum waiting time among the requests it clears. For the offline problem, we give an exact polynomial-time algorithm that computes both the optimum and an optimal service schedule. For the online problem, we give a deterministic $2$-competitive algorithm and, against an oblivious adversary, a randomized $e/(e-1)$-competitive algorithm. Both competitive ratios are optimal, even on rooted paths. We also extend the offline result and both online guarantees to service systems with submodular costs.

cs.DS↗

Exact algorithms for optimal discretization

The optimal discretization problem asks, given two disjoint sets of points $R$ and $B$ in the plane, for a minimal family of horizontal and vertical lines that separate the two sets, so that no cell delimited by the lines contains points from both sets. The problem arises as a pre-processing in supervised machine learning, and has received significant attention in parameterized algorithmics. Answering the question raised by Bonnet, Giannopoulos, and Lampis [IPEC 2017] and Froese [PhD thesis, 2018], it was shown by Kratsch, Masařík, Muzi, Pilipczuk, and Sorge [SODA 2021] that optimal discretization admits a fixed-parameter algorithm with running time $2^{\mathcal{O}(k^2 \log k)} \cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$, where $k$ is the solution size and $n = |R| + |B|$. In this paper we give an algorithm for optimal discretization that runs in time $\mathcal{O}(1.9602^n)$. We also study the related point separation problem that asks to separate all input points by axis-parallel lines. For this problem we obtain an algorithm with runtime $\mathcal{O}(1.8899^n)$. Our guarantees follow from structural observations about bichromatic and monochromatic point sets. To our knowledge, these are the first improvements over the trivial $2^n$ bound for both problems.

cs.DS↗