arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.35028

Testing independence in contamination models

Abstract

We consider a bivariate contamination model in which the distribution of a gold standard is known, while the mixing weight and the distribution of the contaminant component are unknown, and we test whether the two coordinates of the unknown component are independent. Classical independence tests are meaningless here, since a mixture of product distributions is not a product distribution. Following the Inversion-Best Matching principle, we invert the model for every candidate weight and compare the inverted distribution of the unknown component with the product of its marginals. The weight is estimated where they are closest in a Cramer-von Mises sense, and the scaled minimal distance is the test statistic. An exact quadratic structure makes the estimator computable without numerical optimisation and yields a transparent asymptotic theory under both hypotheses. The null distribution is calibrated by a multiplier bootstrap. Simulations and applications to gene expression data and spam filtering illustrate the method.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Olivier Lopez, Xavier Milhaud, Pierre Vandekerkhove. 2026-10-26. Testing independence in contamination models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35028

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Compatibility-based Bayesian inference: asymptotic limits, variational principles, and Wasserstein geometry

Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) replaces intractable likelihood evaluations with comparisons between observed and simulated data. We formulate discrepancy-based inference through nonnegative compatibility weights. Prior-integrated convergence of rescaled weights gives total variation convergence as the tolerance vanishes. For a fixed positive tolerance and increasing sample size, we give a general representation-based formulation of the conditional-prior limit known from ABC and coarsened Bayesian inference, and establish convergence in expected total variation under stabilization in probability and a prior-null boundary condition. We also derive acceptance-persistence bounds under partial stabilization. The Gibbs variational identity yields convergence of minimum values and stability of approximate minimizers; the fixed-tolerance limit is characterized separately by constrained relative-entropy minimization. For additional penalty-based functionals of the limiting Wasserstein discrepancy, we prove an exact reduction to distributions over model laws and, under a geodesic assumption, a representation by distances from a Wasserstein ball. These penalty-based updates are distinguished from the original fixed-tolerance ABC limit and illustrated through a Gaussian comparison.

math.ST↗

A theory of stratification learning

Given i.i.d. sample from a stratified mixture of immersed manifolds of different dimensions, we study the minimax estimation of the underlying stratified structure. We provide a constructive algorithm allowing to estimate each mixture component at its optimal dimension-specific rate adaptively. The method is based on an ascending hierarchical co-detection of points belonging to different layers, which also identifies the number of layers and their dimensions, assigns each data point to a layer accurately, and estimates tangent spaces optimally. These results hold regardless of any ambient assumption on the manifolds or on their intersection configurations. They open the way to a broad clustering framework, where each mixture component models a cluster emanating from a specific nonlinear correlation phenomenon.

math.ST↗

Wasserstein-Cramér-Rao Theory of Unbiased Estimation

The quantity of interest in the classical Cramér-Rao theory of unbiased estimation (e.g., the Cramér-Rao lower bound, its exact attainment for exponential families, and asymptotic efficiency of maximum likelihood estimation) is the variance, which represents the instability of an estimator when its value is compared to the value for an independently-sampled data set from the same distribution. In this paper we are interested in a quantity which represents the instability of an estimator when its value is compared to the value for an infinitesimal additive perturbation of the original data set; we refer to this as the "sensitivity" of an estimator. The resulting theory of sensitivity is based on the Wasserstein geometry in the same way that the classical theory of variance is based on the Fisher-Rao (equivalently, Hellinger) geometry, and this insight allows us to determine a collection of results which are analogous to the classical case: a Wasserstein-Cramér-Rao lower bound for the sensitivity of any unbiased estimator, a characterization of models in which there exist unbiased estimators achieving the lower bound exactly, and various results on the asymptotic achievement of the lower bound. More precisely, we show that Wasserstein projection estimators (and one-step approximations thereof) are asymptotically sensitivity-efficient under suitable assumptions, and that there exist Hodges-type estimators which exhibit super-sensitivity-efficiency. We use these results to treat many statistical examples, sometimes revealing new optimality properties for existing estimators and other times revealing entirely new estimators.

math.ST↗