arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.34695

Local Reflexivity and Exactness for Reduced $C^*$-Algebras of Wreath Products

Abstract

We prove that, for every countable non-exact discrete group $H$ and every nontrivial countable discrete group $K$, the reduced group $C^*$-algebra $C_r^*(K\wr H)$ is not locally reflexive. These provide the first known examples of non-locally reflexive reduced group $C^*$-algebras, settling a longstanding existence question. Moreover, for every nontrivial countable exact discrete group $K$, we establish that local reflexivity of $C_r^*(K\wr H)$ is equivalent to exactness of $H$, and hence to exactness of $C_r^*(K\wr H)$. This gives a partial affirmative answer to Kirchberg's question of whether local reflexivity implies exactness for $C^*$-algebras. As applications, we construct finitely generated groups with the Haagerup property, as well as finitely generated residually finite groups, whose reduced group $C^*$-algebras are not locally reflexive. In particular, neither the Haagerup property nor coarse embeddability into Hilbert space guarantees local reflexivity of the associated reduced group $C^*$-algebra.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pingchuan Dong, Zhe Dong. 2026-10-26. Local Reflexivity and Exactness for Reduced $C^*$-Algebras of Wreath Products. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34695

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

$\mathcal{W}$-absorbing actions of finite groups on the Razak-Jacelon algebra

We say that a countable discrete group action $α$ on a C$^*$-algebra $A$ is \textit{$\mathcal{W}$-absorbing} if there exist a C$^*$-algebra $B$ and an action $β$ on $B$ such that $α$ is cocycle conjugate to $β\otimes \mathrm{id}_{\mathcal{W}}$ on $B\otimes \mathcal{W}$ where $\mathcal{W}$ is the Razak-Jacelon algebra. In this paper, we completely classify outer $\mathcal{W}$-absorbing actions of finite groups on $\mathcal{W}$ up to conjugacy and cocycle conjugacy.

math.OA↗

Maximal Algebraic Ideals in Nonunital $C^*$-Algebras

In this paper, we investigate the existence of maximal algebraic two-sided ideals in nonunital $C^*$-algebras. We formulate singular-distribution estimates in terms of lower semicontinuous $2$-quasitraces and introduce a novel criterion, which we call an admissible compact quasitracial triple set. These tools allow us to control membership in algebraic ideals and to prove the nonexistence of maximal ideals in nonunital $C^*$-algebras under a closed finite-scale face condition. This nonexistence result applies to a broad class of simple $C^*$-algebras including simple separable stable AF algebras, and nonunital, simple, separable, stably finite, $\mathcal Z$-stable $C^*$-algebras $A$ that admit an approximate identity consisting of increasing projections $(p_n)$ and for which the simplex $\operatorname{QT}_2^1(A,p_1)$ of normalized traces at $p_1$ has finitely many extreme points. Moreover, we construct a simple AF algebra whose finite-scale face is dense but not closed and which nevertheless has a maximal dense algebraic ideal. This example yields a negative resolution to a question raised by Ozawa, asking whether every maximal algebraic two-sided ideal in a $C^*$-algebra must be closed.

math.OA↗

$\mathcal{Z}$-stable and selfless inclusions for the infinite braid group

Let $B_\infty$ be the braid group on infinitely many strands and $P_\infty$ its pure braid group. We show that $C^*_r(P_\infty)\subseteq C^*_r(B_\infty)$ and all its intermediate inclusions are $\mathcal{Z}$-stable and completely selfless. This gives natural examples of simple nonnuclear $\mathcal{Z}$-stable $C^*$-algebras. Further examples come from $\mathrm{SL}_\infty(\mathbb{Z})$ and $\mathrm{GL}_\infty(\mathbb{Z})$. We also show that $C^*_r(\mathbb{F}_\infty)\subseteq C^*_r(B_\infty)$ is completely selfless for the free group $\mathbb{F}_\infty$ of braids in which only the first strand moves. All results hold for twisted group $C^*$-algebras. In contrast, $\mathcal{Z}$-stability fails for $B_n$ with $n$ finite and for groups that are not inner amenable.

math.OA↗