A 1.932 Guarantee for (r,Q) Policies in Continuous-Review Lost-Sales Inventory Systems

Abstract

We provide a uniform guarantee for a continuous-review lost-sales inventory system with unit Poisson demand, deterministic lead time, and fixed ordering costs: a simple algorithm computes an $(r,Q)$ policy and chooses between that policy and no replenishment, with cost at most $(\sqrt2+\sqrt6)/2<1.932$ times the unrestricted nonanticipative optimum. The algorithm starts by generating an optimal integer base-stock policy, which at zero setup cost achieves the tight worst-case factor $\sqrt2$ relative to the optimal system cost. For positive setup costs, it uses the reorder point of this integer base-stock policy and an integer lot at the economic order quantity scale. The inclusion of ordinary base stock in the continuous-review capped base-stock family also improves that family's earlier asymptotic $1.79$ upper guarantee to a uniform $\sqrt2$ guarantee valid at every finite parameter vector. To establish these guarantees, we construct a computable lower bound on the zero-setup optimal cost by tracking units already on hand or committed for delivery. We then combine it with a bound on holding and setup costs required by batching to obtain the general-setup guarantee and instance-specific performance bounds for any admissible replenishment policy. In our numerical study, the largest estimated policy-cost-to-lower-bound ratios are about $1.59$ for our heuristic $(r, Q)$ policy and $1.47$ after joint optimization of $r$ and $Q$. The heuristic also performs well against the optimized policy: over the sampled instances, its median extra cost ranges from $2.33\%$ to $3.91\%$, depending on the setup cost.