arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.34133

Smart charging without rebound peaks: Wholesale price feedback limits distribution grid peaks from price-responsive electric vehicles

Lion Hirth
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Studies on price-optimized EV charging consistently find that the common price signal synchronizes charging of the entire fleet of cars in the cheapest hours and creates new "rebound" load peaks in low-voltage grids. Almost all of these studies treat wholesale prices as exogenous, i.e., unaffected by the shifting EV load. This paper argues that this assumption overstates the problem: charging in low-price hours raises the wholesale price in those hours, which spreads charging across hours in equilibrium. I simulate price-optimized charging under real-time prices calibrated to German 2025 data. Even when adjusting for the increase in electricity demand, the coincident import peak of the local grid rises by 260%. After adding a model of equilibrium wholesale prices that takes the price-quantity feedback into account, the increase is reduced to a mere 5%. Allowing for vehicle-to-grid, the export peak rises by 115% and falls by 6%, respectively. The result holds across vehicle and charging parameters, charging constraints, renewable scenarios, network charges, price functions, peak measures, and simulation assumptions. Rebound peaks remain possible where vehicle adoption runs ahead of the national average or where charging power is high, but they are much smaller than the literature consensus suggests.

Explore related subjects

econ.GNq-fin.EC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lion Hirth. 2026-10-25. Smart charging without rebound peaks: Wholesale price feedback limits distribution grid peaks from price-responsive electric vehicles. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34133

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Urban Reconstruction and Population Redistribution: Evidence from Tokyo after the Great Kanto Earthquake

This study examines the impact of the 1923 Great Kanto Earthquake on population distribution within Tokyo City. The earthquake triggered massive fires that devastated nearly half of the city, including much of its urban core. To investigate its consequences, I digitized systematic census statistics and conducted regression analyses using variation in fire damage across areas. The results show that land readjustment implemented as part of the reconstruction project reduced residential land area within the burned area, leading to higher unit rents. Although the total residential floor area eventually recovered through the construction of multi-story dwellings, the number of households in the burned area remained below its pre-earthquake level throughout the period examined, and the population, while almost recovering by 1935, never exceeded its pre-earthquake level. In addition, the zoning system established before the earthquake had little effect on population redistribution. These findings suggest that post-disaster population distribution was shaped primarily by market-based price adjustments rather than institutional regulations. The analysis further shows that rising rents reduced the number of kinship households while increasing incentives for workers to rent rooms. The rent burden borne by lodgers, relative to that borne by landlords, was lower in the burned area, making housing sharing an effective response. Overall, the post-disaster population decline in the burned area reflected the net effect of two opposing forces: population loss driven by rising rents and population retention through increased housing sharing among worker households seeking to mitigate those rent increases.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Efficiency vs Capability in the Intelligence Explosion

AI progress can feed back into AI research in two ways. Capability improvements allow AIs to perform a larger share of AI research tasks, while efficiency improvements raise AI research output per unit of compute on tasks already automated. In a task automation model of AI research, I show that a software-driven intelligence explosion - a self-sustaining acceleration in AI progress with fixed compute and human labor - requires both margins to improve sufficiently fast, and neither margin can substitute for the other. To see whether these conditions hold, I calibrate both margins with data on recent AI progress. I estimate that capability progress is likely fast enough to support an SIE, while efficiency progress is on the knife-edge. In Monte Carlo simulations, an SIE occurs in 49% of draws, indicating that an SIE is plausible but uncertain based on historical trends in AI progress. The single largest source of uncertainty is the rate of efficiency progress, whose uncertainty is responsible for 45% of the uncertainty about whether an SIE occurs, more than all other parameters combined. Thus, better data on efficiency progress in frontier models is essential for understanding the likelihood of an SIE.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Geoeconomic Stress and European Defence Readiness

This study develops a country-level measure of the economic-industrial capacity of European NATO Allies to mobilise, replenish, maintain, and sustain military capability under strategic stress. The measure comprises four components: macroeconomic capacity, sectoral resilience, defence-industrial capability, and logistics and sustainment. The analysis covers 28 European Allies and evaluates a balanced baseline against five geoeconomic stress scenarios. The results distinguish baseline capacity from stress vulnerability and provide an assessment framework for identifying the economic-industrial bottlenecks that can constrain sustained military readiness. Baseline scores vary materially across countries, with a sample mean of 0.610 and a range from 0.471 to 0.759. The calibrated geoeconomic shocks reduce effective capacity in every scenario, though the effects are highly heterogeneous. The combined-stress scenario has the largest average effect, lowering the sample mean to 0.491, a decline of 19.5 per cent relative to baseline. TRS and PR operate mainly through defence-industrial and replenishment constraints; supply-chain fragmentation is driven primarily by sectoral exposure and substitutability; and external-support reduction operates through allied access and sustainment. Our results suggest shifting attention from expenditure targets alone towards the capacity to convert resources into usable military capability: the key issue is not only how much is spent, but also which bottlenecks limit the conversion of resources into capability.

econ.GN↗