arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.33934

New Fault-Tolerant $(α,β)$-Spanners

Abstract

We present new constructions of vertex fault-tolerant (VFT) $(α,β)$-spanners with substantially improved size bounds. Given a bound $f$ on the number of vertex faults, an $f$-VFT $(α,β)$-spanner is a subgraph of $G$ that preserves an $(α,β)$-spanner of $G- F$ for every fault set $F \subseteq V$ with $|F| \le f$. Most existing constructions of VFT $(α,β)$-spanners rely on a black-box sampling technique that incurs an exponential blow-up compared to their non-fault-tolerant counterparts. We develop two independent techniques for constructing $f$-VFT $(α,β)$-spanners that improve the dependence on $f$, reducing it to polynomial overhead. For every unweighted graph $G=(V,E)$ on $n$ vertices, stretch parameter $k$, and fault parameter $f$, we show: (i) $f$-VFT $(O_ε(k^ε), O_ε(k))$-spanners with $\tilde{O}(f^{exp(1/ε)}\cdot n^{1+1/k})$ edges for any $ε\in (0,1)$. For any fixed constant $ε$, this introduces a $poly(f)$ overhead compared to the non-faulty constructions of [Ben-Levy and Parter, SODA 2020] and [Chechik and Lifshitz, SODA 2026]. (ii) For any $δ\in (0,1)$, an $f$-VFT $\left(O_δ(\sqrt{k}),O_δ(k) \right)$-spanner of size $\tilde{O}(f^{1+δ} \cdot n^{1+\frac{1}{k}})$. Hence, it incurs a size overhead of only $f^{1+δ}$ compared to the above-mentioned non-faulty analogs. (iii) $f$-VFT $(k,k-1)$ spanner of size $O(k^3 \cdot f \cdot n^{1+\frac{1}{k}})$, nearly matching the lower bound $Ω(f^{1-\frac{1}{k}}n^{1+\frac{1}{k}})$ known for $f$-VFT $(2k-1,0)$ spanners by [Bodwin et al., SODA 2018]. The first result is obtained via a new adaptation of the Baswana--Sen framework to the VFT $(α,β)$ setting. The other two bounds follow from a highly involved analysis of a natural extension of the fault-tolerant greedy spanner.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Merav Parter, Elizaveta Popova, Elad Tzalik. 2026-10-24. New Fault-Tolerant $(α,β)$-Spanners. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33934

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Online Multi-Level Aggregation with Maximum Delay

We study Multi-Level Aggregation with Maximum Delay (MLA-MD) on finite weighted rooted trees. Each service pays for a rooted subtree and for the maximum waiting time among the requests it clears. For the offline problem, we give an exact polynomial-time algorithm that computes both the optimum and an optimal service schedule. For the online problem, we give a deterministic $2$-competitive algorithm and, against an oblivious adversary, a randomized $e/(e-1)$-competitive algorithm. Both competitive ratios are optimal, even on rooted paths. We also extend the offline result and both online guarantees to service systems with submodular costs.

cs.DS↗

Exact algorithms for optimal discretization

The optimal discretization problem asks, given two disjoint sets of points $R$ and $B$ in the plane, for a minimal family of horizontal and vertical lines that separate the two sets, so that no cell delimited by the lines contains points from both sets. The problem arises as a pre-processing in supervised machine learning, and has received significant attention in parameterized algorithmics. Answering the question raised by Bonnet, Giannopoulos, and Lampis [IPEC 2017] and Froese [PhD thesis, 2018], it was shown by Kratsch, Masařík, Muzi, Pilipczuk, and Sorge [SODA 2021] that optimal discretization admits a fixed-parameter algorithm with running time $2^{\mathcal{O}(k^2 \log k)} \cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$, where $k$ is the solution size and $n = |R| + |B|$. In this paper we give an algorithm for optimal discretization that runs in time $\mathcal{O}(1.9602^n)$. We also study the related point separation problem that asks to separate all input points by axis-parallel lines. For this problem we obtain an algorithm with runtime $\mathcal{O}(1.8899^n)$. Our guarantees follow from structural observations about bichromatic and monochromatic point sets. To our knowledge, these are the first improvements over the trivial $2^n$ bound for both problems.

cs.DS↗