Approximate Quantile Factor Models

Xiaochun Liu

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.33461

Approximate Quantile Factor Models

Xiaochun Liu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Weakly dependent idiosyncratic errors are standard in mean factor models, but quantile factor models have been analyzed only under independence. The mean-case definition of weak dependence, a bound on the eigenvalues of the error covariance matrix, does not carry over: I show that it neither implies nor is implied by the property that controls quantile estimation, since uncorrelated errors can share a pervasive quantile component. I instead define approximate quantile factor models through a concentration condition on the idiosyncratic array. Under it, the quantile factor analysis (QFA) estimator is consistent at a rate that deteriorates by the square root of a dependence constant, which is minimax optimal, and the number of factors is consistently estimated. Dependence changes the asymptotic variance, for which I provide HAC and thresholded estimators. Monte Carlo experiments confirm these predictions. In FRED-QD and FRED-MD, standard errors ignoring dependence understate uncertainty, most strongly in the tails.

Explore related subjects

econ.EM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Xiaochun Liu. 2026-10-24. Approximate Quantile Factor Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33461

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Valid Post-Contextual Bandit Inference

Contextual multi-armed bandits (CMAB) are increasingly used as adaptively sampled experiments, after which researchers test hypotheses about treatment effects. We derive the Hájek-Le Cam limit experiment for multi-armed contextual bandits under equal-arms (weak-signal) asymptotics. It is Locally Asymptotically Quadratic, but not a (mixed) Gaussian shift experiment. Girsanov's theorem gives it a structural representation in stochastic differential equations. Together with a general weak convergence result, this yields the asymptotic null distribution and local asymptotic power of often-used test statistics. Two kinds of nuisance parameters threaten size control: the common reward level of the arms of interest and the rewards of the arms not of interest. The first threat is removed by translation-invariant sampling. We propose Regularized Translation-Invariant (RTI) versions of Thompson, tempered-greedy, tempered-(Lin)UCB, and exploration sampling. The second threat calls for appropriate pivots. The structural representation of the limit experiment is key to overcome the inferential challenges arising from adaptive sampling. Simulations corroborate the theory.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Evaluating A/B Testing Methodologies via Sample Splitting: Theory and Practice

We develop a theoretical framework for sample splitting in A/B testing environments, where data for each test are partitioned into two splits to measure methodological performance when the true impacts of tests are unobserved. We show that sample-split estimators are generally biased for full-sample performance but consistently estimate sample-split analogues of it. We derive their asymptotic distributions, construct valid confidence intervals, and characterize the bias-variance trade-offs underlying sample-split design choices. We validate our theoretical results through simulations and provide implementation guidance for A/B testing products seeking to evaluate new estimators and decision rules.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Bias Correction and Inference for Panel Quantile Regression

We develop a large-$n$, large-$T$ theory for the unsmoothed fixed-effects quantile regression estimator, paralleling Hahn and Newey (2004) for smooth nonlinear panel models. An exact rank-score identity for the profiled criterion, with a convexity argument, delivers the leading incidental parameter bias of the slope estimator, of order $T^{-1}$, in closed form. When $n$ and $T$ grow at the same rate, the estimator is asymptotically normal but in general not centred, and conventional intervals are invalid. Admissible growth of $n$ relative to $T$, up to $n=o(T^3)$, depends on the regularity of the conditional error densities. A split-panel jackknife removes the leading bias throughout this range and yields valid inference. In serially dependent panels whose dependence decays geometrically or polynomially, the bias acquires a term from the dependence between regressors and errors of different periods, the jackknife remains valid with contiguous but not with interleaved half-panels, and clustered standard errors are valid.

econ.EM↗