arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.33399

Ground-motion simulation of multi-segment ruptures on the Alpine-Marlborough fault system

Brendon A. Bradley·Jake Faulkner·Felipe Kuncar·Cesar A. Pajaro
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Alpine Fault (AF) is the major plate boundary crustal structure in New Zealand (NZ), producing large-to-great (M7-8+) earthquakes approximately every 300-500 years, and has long been a focal point for earthquake resilience in NZ. This study advances prior AF ground-motion modelling by considering multi-segment ruptures that initiate on the AF and rupture northward onto structures in the Marlborough Fault Zone (MFZ), resulting in ground shaking of consequential amplitudes for the upper South Island and Lower North Island, including Wellington city. From the 2022 NZ National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM), three multi-segment rupture geometries including the Wairau, Clarence, and Hope fault structures in the MFZ are obtained, together with their scenario rupture rates. Hybrid broadband simulations using a multi-segment kinematic source description and a 3D NZ crustal velocity model are performed. Three rupture realizations per geometry are considered to compare the effects of kinematic rupture randomness with those of the different geometries. To provide comparisons with the prior ground-motion simulations used for public outreach in the AF8 programme, we also simulated the segmented M7.9 Alpine Fiordland-to-Kelly rupture geometry of Bradley et al. (2017a), adopting the same southern hypocentre location in all rupture scenarios, enabling examination of differences due to eight years of advancements in kinematic rupture and crustal velocity modelling. Results illustrate strong northward directivity and basin response, with the largest Wellington amplitudes resulting from the Alpine-Wairau and Alpine-Clarence scenarios -- peak ground accelerations of approximately 0.1 g, comparable to those observed during the 2016 Kaikōura earthquake; in aggregate, these Alpine-MFZ ruptures have a likelihood similar to the conventionally-considered Wellington Fault and Hikurangi subduction sources.

Explore related subjects

physics.geo-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Brendon A. Bradley, Jake Faulkner, Felipe Kuncar, Cesar A. Pajaro. 2026-10-24. Ground-motion simulation of multi-segment ruptures on the Alpine-Marlborough fault system. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33399

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Explainable GeoAI for urban wildfire structure loss: vegetation and built environment in the 2025 Palisades Fire

Urban wildfire resilience depends on interactions among built form, vegetation condition, and extreme fire weather, yet city-scale risk models often overlook whether predictive skill transfers across neighborhoods. We developed a spatially validated GeoAI workflow for the January 2025 Palisades Fire, linking 12,081 CAL FIRE damage inspections to pre-fire Sentinel-2 vegetation indices, Landsat surface temperature, LANDFIRE fuels, terrain, and OpenStreetMap buildings and roads. Among 9,883 inspected residential structures, 5,566 were destroyed. Random cross-validation yielded ROC-AUC 0.92 for the integrated XGBoost model, but 1 km spatial block validation reduced performance to 0.75; logistic regression performed similarly and was better calibrated. Building count within 100 m was the strongest predictor, with destruction odds increasing 4.12-fold per standard deviation. Vegetation moisture and greenness showed opposing conditional associations: NDMI at 100-300 m was protective (OR 0.52), whereas NDVI at 30-100 m was positively associated with destruction after accounting for moisture (OR 1.74). Predictive information was concentrated at the 100-300 m neighborhood scale. A separate post-fire track mapped burn severity and vegetation recovery without leakage. The results support neighborhood-scale susceptibility screening, moisture-aware vegetation management, and spatial block validation as a minimum standard for single-event urban wildfire modeling.

physics.geo-ph↗
arXiv2026

GeoAgent: Contract-Constrained LLM Agents for Seismic Data Processing

Large language models (LLMs) can drive scientific software through function calling, but free-form tool use is fragile on long, data-dependent processing chains. Models omit arguments, invent units, feed the previous artifact into the wrong input, and report completion without a verifiable product. We present GeoAgent, an agent system for seismic data processing built on Madagascar's roughly 1{,}965 command-line programs. GeoAgent exposes 54 operator agents (51 generated from a declarative specification), retrieves from an index of 1{,}937 operators, and encodes the processing flow as a nine-stage state graph. Four explicit contracts---named artifacts, input resolution, parameter takeover, and artifact validation---move everything the graph can determine out of the model's discretion. A deterministic geometry tool parses the self-describing SPS/RPS/XPS and SEG-Y headers, cross-checks eight consistency conditions, and reproduces the reference shell recipe exactly. The system runs in containers with session- and task-level isolation, bounded execution, and defenses against silent failures. On a 2-D land dataset, the nine-stage pipeline completes in about six to eleven minutes and yields a verified artifact at every stage, while retrieval reduces per-turn tool context from about 12k to 2k tokens. We report the design, deployment experience, and motivating failure modes.

physics.geo-ph↗
arXiv2026

Evaluating Neural Probabilistic Forecasts of Sparse Earthquake Counts: What Survives a Careful Evaluation

We revisit a neural negative binomial model for weekly earthquake counts on a 3 x 3 degree grid over the Tian Shan and Pamir, and ask which of its conclusions survive a careful evaluation. At the completeness magnitude of 4.5, the 144-week test period holds 2448 cell-weeks; six cell-weeks, in five distinct weeks, have three or more events. Two conclusions survive. First, Poisson forecasts, temporal ETAS included, understate the probability of such a busy week: ETAS expects 0.72 where six occurred, a shortfall by a factor of 8.3 (p = 0.00009, exact test). One dispersion parameter removes it (ETAS with dispersion expects 4.45, p = 0.58); simulating aftershock chains within the week also reproduces the tail but overshoots the total count by about a quarter. Second, the network's advantage over a linear model disappears once that model has an intercept per cell: the remaining gain is 3.4% of deviance, not significant (p = 0.57 over five test years), and it comes from one cell-week out of the 4420 scored; without it the network is 0.7% worse. A blind test on 2024 to September 2026, with every model fitted on data through 2023, confirms the tail result: Poisson forecasts are rejected (p from 3 x 10^-8 to 0.001), dispersion models are not (p between 0.25 and 0.84), except the NB GLM, whose level blew up out of sample and which is rejected at p = 0.003. Out of sample, model families differ in how they extrapolate beyond the training range, not in the per-cell term. We also measure the evaluation traps met on the way: a biased reference level, a single seed (five of six effects in v1's results table change sign), too few bootstrap resamples, and a threshold below completeness, which shrinks the ETAS shortfall from 8.3 to 2.8 times. This version replaces preprint v1; Section 7 lists the corrections.

physics.geo-ph↗