arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.32970

On the continuity of conditional distributions and stratification for derivative pricing

Abstract

Stratification can reduce the estimator variance in Monte Carlo simulations by partitioning the sample space according to a low-dimensional factor and sampling separately within the resulting strata, making it well suited to the valuation of path-dependent claims in high-dimensional financial models. Its performance, however, depends critically on the choice of the stratification factor, and effective low-dimensional factors are generally difficult to identify in complex continuous-time models. Neural networks provide a flexible approximation class for this purpose and have proved useful in related variance-reduction problems in quantitative finance. In this paper, we study the construction of neural stratification factors for derivative pricing under proportional allocation in continuous-time models. Since the numerical construction of a stratification factor typically involves approximation, we establish continuity results for the associated conditional expectations and, more generally, conditional distributions, and provide several counterexamples showing the limits of this continuity theory. Combined with density results for neural networks, our findings yield a universal approximation theorem for admissible stratification factors. We conclude with numerical experiments involving a constant-maturity-swap range accrual in a two-factor Gaussian short-rate model and a worst-of autocallable in a Wishart stochastic covariance model, where the learned factors outperform all considered benchmarks.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aleksandar Arandjelovic, Patrick Cheridito. 2026-10-23. On the continuity of conditional distributions and stratification for derivative pricing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32970

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Forecasting implied volatility surface with generative diffusion models

We introduce a conditional Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model (DDPM) for generating one-day-ahead approximately arbitrage-free implied volatility surfaces. To capture the path-dependent nature of volatility dynamics, we condition our model on a set of market variables, including exponentially weighted moving averages (EWMAs) of historical vol-surfaces, returns and squared returns of the underlying asset, and scalar risk indicators associated with the underlying asset. A key challenge is that the historical data used for training often contain arbitrage opportunities, particularly in the earlier part of the sample, which conflicts with the goal of generating arbitrage-free surfaces. We address this by using a weighting scheme based on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to incorporate the arbitrage penalty into the loss function. The scheme dynamically adjusts the penalty strength across the diffusion process. Through numerical experiments using market data on S\&P 500 options, we demonstrate the superior performance of our proposed model in volatility forecasting compared to existing modern and classical approaches.

q-fin.CP↗

Rethinking Synthetic Scenario Realism: Compatibility, Not Fidelity, Drives Hedging Performance

Deep hedging has emerged as a data-driven approach to optimizing hedging strategies. Since real market data are often limited, synthetic price paths play a crucial role in training these strategies. However, existing approaches primarily evaluate synthetic data generators based on statistical realism, while its relationship with hedging performance remains unclear. In this work, we introduce a decision-centric perspective on synthetic data for deep hedging through the notion of compatibility, which captures discrepancies in hedging risk between synthetic and real market environments. Theoretically, we establish an upper bound on hedging performance degradation in terms of learning error and a compatibility gap, and show that statistical realism and compatibility can structurally diverge. In controlled experiments, we demonstrate that the compatibility gap captures variations in hedging degradation across tasks even when generator realism is held fixed. Empirically, using real market data, we show that statistical realism does not consistently predict hedging performance, and that generator rankings depend on both hedging strategy classes and task structure.

q-fin.CP↗

Lineage-Aware Search Control for LLM-Based Evolutionary Factor Mining

Formulaic alpha factor mining searches for symbolic expressions that transform market data into predictive signals. Recent LLM-based evolutionary factor mining methods use large language models as semantic variation operators. Under the conventional LLM-EA paradigm, stochastic variation and fitness-based selection can leave the search weakly directed and concentrated around a narrow set of structurally similar factors. We argue that these limitations arise because current methods mainly organize search at the individual and population levels, leaving lineage-level control underused. A lineage connects successive factor variants through evolutionary descent. We propose LineageEvo, which uses lineage in two coupled forms of search control: (1) lineage-conditioned LLM variation, which distills Lineage-Scoped Search Experience into operator-specific priors and fuses them with global operator priors, providing persistent, lineage-relevant guidance for LLM generation; and (2) lineage-stratified search allocation, which balances factor quality against lineage concentration by distributing the search budget across lineages during evolutionary search. Together, these mechanisms make semantic variation more direction aware and prevent branches from dominating the evolution, thereby promoting the discovery of predictive and diverse factors. We evaluate LineageEvo on CSI 500 and S&P 500 in terms of factor predictiveness, portfolio performance, search efficiency, and lineage- and expression-level diversity. LineageEvo achieves the strongest predictive performance on both markets, while LSPS produces a more balanced lineage distribution and a structurally broader factor pool. The results support lineage as a useful intermediate unit for controlling LLM-based evolutionary factor search.

q-fin.CP↗