arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.32854

Singular Geometry of Low-Rank Adaptation

Abstract

Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) is now a standard approach to parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large neural networks. Its low-rank factorization is inherently non-identifiable, making LoRA a singular statistical model whose learning complexity cannot be described by parameter dimension alone. We study this complexity using the real log canonical threshold (RLCT) from singular learning theory and how it depends on both the low-rank parameterization and the pretrained network. Under a local linearization, LoRA induces a low-rank trace regression model whose Kullback--Leibler geometry is controlled by a forward-backward covariance, constructed from activations and backpropagated sensitivities at the adapted layer. This covariance determines which low-rank perturbations are statistically observable. When it is nondegenerate along the relevant low-rank directions, we recover the classical learning complexity of reduced-rank regression; when its kernel meets these directions, additional statistically indistinguishable parameters change the singular geometry. We characterize this geometry locally through observable tangent directions and a residual singularity, and globally through affine linear sections of determinantal varieties. The global learning complexity need not be determined at a ground-truth parameter, as singularities on another rank stratum can dominate. We also introduce a curvature-corrected multi-temperature estimator of the RLCT. Experiments on multilayer perceptron and transformer architectures reveal strongly layer-dependent forward-backward geometry and show that ambient covariance degeneracy does not imply degeneracy along the low-rank directions relevant to adaptation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kamillo Ferry, Anthea Monod, Keisuke Yano. 2026-10-23. Singular Geometry of Low-Rank Adaptation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32854

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Stochastic Inverse Problem: stability, regularization and Wasserstein gradient flow

Inverse problems in physical or biological sciences often involve recovering an unknown parameter that is random. The sought-after quantity is a probability distribution of the unknown parameter, that produces data that aligns with measurements. Consequently, these problems are naturally framed as stochastic inverse problems. In this paper, we explore three aspects of this problem: direct inversion, variational formulation with regularization, and optimization via gradient flows, drawing parallels with deterministic inverse problems. A key difference from the deterministic case is the space in which we operate. Here, we work within a probability space rather than Euclidean or Sobolev spaces, making tools from measure transport theory necessary for the study. Our findings reveal that the choice of metric---both in the design of the loss function and in the optimization process---significantly impacts the stability and properties of the optimizer.

stat.ML↗

Dense ReLU Neural Networks for Temporal-spatial Model

In this paper, we focus on fully connected deep neural networks utilizing the Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) activation function for nonparametric estimation. We derive non-asymptotic bounds that lead to convergence rates, addressing both temporal and spatial dependence in the observed measurements. By accounting for dependencies across time and space, our models better reflect the complexities of real-world data, enhancing both predictive performance and theoretical robustness. We also tackle the curse of dimensionality by modeling the data on a manifold, exploring the intrinsic dimensionality of high-dimensional data. We broaden existing theoretical findings of temporal-spatial analysis by applying them to neural networks in more general contexts and demonstrate that our proof techniques are effective for models with short-range dependence. Our empirical simulations across various synthetic response functions underscore the superior performance of our method, outperforming established approaches in the existing literature. These findings provide valuable insights into the strong capabilities of dense neural networks (Dense NN) for temporal-spatial modeling across a broad range of function classes.

stat.ML↗

On the Complexity of Best-Arm Identification in Non-Stationary Linear Bandits

We study the fixed-budget best-arm identification (BAI) problem in non-stationary linear bandits. Concretely, given a fixed time budget $T\in \mathbb{N}$, finite arm set $\mathcal{X} \subset \mathbb{R}^d$, and a potentially adversarial sequence of unknown parameters $\lbrace θ_t\rbrace_{t=1}^{T}$ (hence non-stationary), a learner aims to identify the arm with the largest cumulative reward $x_* = \arg\max_{x \in \mathcal{X}} x^\top\sum_{t=1}^T θ_t$ with high probability. In this setting, it is well-known that i.i.d. sampling arms from the G-optimal design yields a minimax-optimal error probability of $\exp\left(-Θ\left(T / H_{G}\right)\right)$, where $H_{G}$ scales proportionally with the dimension $d$. However, this notion of complexity is overly pessimistic, as it is derived from a lower bound in which the arm set consists only of the standard basis vectors, thus masking any potential advantages arising from arm sets with richer geometric structure. To address this, we establish an arm-set-dependent lower bound that, in contrast, holds for any arm set. Motivated by the ideas underlying our lower bound, we propose the Adjacent-optimal design, a specialization of the well-known $\mathcal{X}\mathcal{Y}$-optimal design, and develop the $\textsf{Adjacent-BAI}$ algorithm. We prove that the error probability of $\textsf{Adjacent-BAI}$ matches our lower bound up to constants, verifying the tightness of our lower bound, and establishing the arm-set-dependent complexity of this setting.

stat.ML↗