arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.32681

Optimal Random Taxation

Chengfeng Shen·Felix Kübler
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider the Ramsey problem of optimal government policy and give examples where lotteries are essential for the optimal solution. When markets are complete and the representative agent's coefficient of relative prudence is bounded, lotteries are typically not optimal. For the incomplete markets case, we prove analytically that lotteries improve welfare for some calibrations with CRRA utility, and we give a simple numerical example for this claim. When the agent's coefficient of relative risk aversion is unbounded for small consumption, lotteries typically improve welfare and can be used to approximate the first-best solution arbitrarily well in both the complete and the incomplete markets cases. However, in the complete markets case, when debt constraints are not too tight and the representative agent is sufficiently patient, lotteries can be purified in the sense that there is a deterministic solution that gives the same value.

Explore related subjects

econ.TH

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chengfeng Shen, Felix Kübler. 2026-10-23. Optimal Random Taxation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32681

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Rational Learning One Step Off the Path

We study how endogenous learning shapes beliefs and strategies in extensive-form games. We adopt the overlapping-generations model of \citet{FL1993}, in which finitely lived Bayesian agents are randomly matched, observe only the outcomes of their own matches, and choose dynamically optimal strategies. We study limiting strategy profiles in steady states as agents become arbitrarily long lived and patient. We show that learning disciplines beliefs and strategies in subgames reached after a single deviation from the path of play. In particular, we establish the converse of \citet{FL2006}, showing that such limiting strategy profiles must be path-equivalent to subgame-confirmed equilibria.

econ.TH↗
arXiv2026

A metric on solutions of the bargaining problem

We consider the classic bargaining problem: two players have to agree on a `fair' division $(x,y) \in Ω\subset \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}^2$ which results in Player 1 receiving $x$ and Player 2 receiving $y$. The usual approach to this problem has been to impose a number of desirable axioms that a fair division should have and then conclude that the solution is uniquely defined by the axioms. We take an orthogonal view, avoid the discussion of axioms, and ask whether different and contradicting axioms may give rise to similar solutions. To this end, we define a natural metric on the space of solutions to the bargaining problem. The metric shows a strong internal consistency between the three celebrated solutions due to Nash (1950), Raiffa (1953) and Kalai-Smorodinsky (1975). It identifies problematic cases for the Utilitarian solution and the Perles-Maschler solution (1981). The area monotonic solution of Anbarci-Bigelow (1988) is shown to be nearly perfectly located on a shortest path from Nash to Kalai-Smorodinsky.

econ.TH↗
arXiv2026

Monetizing Intelligence: Advertising and Subscription Design on LLM Platforms

Large language model (LLM) platforms introducing advertising must decide how much capability ad revenue should fund and what consumers should pay to avoid ads. We study a monopolistic platform that jointly chooses costly response quality, advertising intensity, and subscription prices when advertising reduces user value but better service raises advertising returns. Three findings follow. First, when partly ad-supported and ad-free plans coexist, advertising can finance useful service for consumers who receive none under pure subscription. Lower effective quality in middle plans weakens the alternatives available to premium users, allowing higher prices for unchanged ad-free service. Some fully ad-supported users gain utility, while partly ad-supported and ad-free users lose: broader access can coexist with utility polarization. Second, an intermediate advertising cap can maximize consumer surplus by preserving some revenue that finances service while limiting degradation. Third, cheaper compute can raise quality and reduce ad intensity, yet sufficiently large cost reductions can increase aggregate advertising revenue above its initial level because better service raises the value of the remaining advertised interactions. An extension shows how advertising-funded upgrades can bring plans to the same maximum capability and advertising exposure, eliminating the basis for different prices. These results make menu design central to evaluating LLM advertising: the consequences extend beyond users who see ads to the alternatives and prices faced by those who do not.

econ.TH↗