arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.32616

From archive to resource: bringing legacy data back to life at scale with large language models

C. H. Vieira-Vieira·I. Schneider Chernov·A. Serra·M. Correa Marrero·P. L. Bhavani Mohan·G. Duchateau-Nguyen·T. Y. Doktorova·A. Kreuchwig
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Pharmaceutical companies maintain vast archives of legacy preclinical study reports that contain study-context details, such as fasting, anesthesia, and laboratory instrumentation, that are rarely captured in structured data formats, yet they can correlate with clinical pathology parameters values and limit the reuse of historical data. This work demonstrates practical, scalable solutions to recover such descriptors from heterogeneous report texts using large language model (LLM)-based extraction pipelines developed independently by two industry teams. The pipelines identify and normalize metadata fields and return verbatim evidence with page and section reference, hasting human verification and iterative refinement. Evaluation of over 400 documents against expert-curated reference values showed high agreement across a broad set of metadata fields. Performance was strongest for consistently reported items and lower for descriptors subject to linguistic or report structure variability. Extraction time has shrunk from 25 minutes in the manual benchmark to 1.6 minutes. As a concrete biological demonstration, we show that fasting status extracted from report text was associated with species- and analyte-specific shifts in clinical chemistry parameters, illustrating how recovered metadata can improve selection of historical controls. Key strengths of the approach are scalability, traceability, and the ability to recover information missing from current industry standards. Main limitations are dependence on source-report quality and initial expert effort to define and refine schemas. These results establish how LLMs can convert heterogeneous, unstructured legacy reports into evidence-grounded, reusable and structured metadata, leading to better experimental comparability, and thus enabling reliable data pooling or informed virtual control selection.

Explore related subjects

cs.IR

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C. H. Vieira-Vieira, I. Schneider Chernov, A. Serra, M. Correa Marrero, P. L. Bhavani Mohan, G. Duchateau-Nguyen, T. Y. Doktorova, A. Kreuchwig. 2026-10-23. From archive to resource: bringing legacy data back to life at scale with large language models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32616

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

From Item Scores to Semantic Tokens: Test-Time Collaborative Adaptation for Generative Recommendation

Generative recommenders using semantic identifiers predict items through successive token decisions, but beam search may irreversibly prune promising item paths. This limitation is particularly consequential when a few recent interactions signal an emerging interest while earlier behavior favors established preferences. Yet an independently trained discriminative recommender may rank the same items highly from the same interaction history. Such complementary scores are available at test time, offering a way to adapt a frozen generator without retraining either model. The challenge is to use these scores before pruning: combining completed recommendation lists cannot alter earlier beam decisions, while scores over complete items cannot directly inform choices among semantic prefixes shared by multiple items. We propose \textbf{T}est-Time \textbf{C}ollaborative \textbf{B}eam \textbf{S}earch \textbf{A}daptation (\textbf{TCBSA}), a training-free method that incorporates collaborative information into semantic decoding. TCBSA transforms discriminative score margins into potentials over shared semantic edges and uses a confidence gate to regulate their contributions to cumulative path scores before beam selection. We establish a sufficient condition for target prefix survival under global beam competition and bound score perturbations under low discriminative confidence. Full-catalog experiments show consistent improvements over strong baselines across datasets and different generative and discriminative recommenders. Analyses of emerging interests and decoding behavior demonstrate gains in recommendation accuracy and target path survival, while targeted interventions support the contribution of shared prefix corrections. TCBSA also offers a favorable balance between recommendation accuracy and inference latency compared with simply widening the native beam.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

PersonalQuery-Benchmark:Evaluating Retrieval Robustness to Personalized User Expression Differences

Existing personalized information retrieval methods mainly model differences in user needs through user preferences and query intent, while paying little attention to the personalized expression differences that arise when different users express the same retrieval need. Existing real query data typically lack stable user identities, long-term expression histories, and intent-matched counterparts, making it difficult to systematically evaluate the impact of personalized expression differences on retrieval outcomes. To this end, we propose PersonalQuery-Benchmark (PQB). PQB models personalized syntactic expression and personalized writing errors from users' historical texts, constructs personalized syntactic expression queries and personalized writing-error queries, and validates benchmark quality through LLM assessment and independent human evaluation. PQB covers three Amazon product domains with 6,516 query instances in total, and is evaluated on five retrieval models representing lexical, learned sparse, dense bi-encoder, late-interaction, and hybrid architectures, together with two LLM-based ranking models. Results show that even when the information need is held fixed, personalized expression differences still induce measurable ranking variation; different retrieval models exhibit clearly different sensitivities to syntactic variation and writing-error variation, while higher overall retrieval effectiveness does not necessarily correspond to stronger robustness against expression variation. PQB provides a new benchmark and evaluation framework for systematically studying personalized expression robustness. The associated code and dataset are available at the following address: https://github.com/cpxjazz123/PersonalQuery-Benchmark.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

SkillRep: Characterizing and Understanding the Representation Design Space of Agent Skill Retrieval

Retrieving the right skill from a large library is essential for LLM agents, yet requests and skills are written for different purposes and in different words. Existing retrievers narrow this request-skill gap with one or two representation choices each, so it is unknown whether their gains hold in combination. No prior work measures the gap itself, so it is also unclear which part of it each choice narrows. We define a representation design space by five choices -- encoder fine-tuning, query-side and document-side expansion, background projection and a lexical channel -- and evaluate them together for the first time, as modules of one retriever, SkillRep. With a 0.6B encoder and LLM expansion, SkillRep improves MRR@10 on SRA-Bench over the strongest same-size retriever by 7.02 points with the official skill pool and 8.79 with UniPool, a 111,247-skill pool we build from public registries, and is best on SkillsBench. The value of each choice depends on the others. Fine-tuning, for instance, reverses the ranking of the four training-free modules and turns them from complementary into overlapping. To understand why, we measure the gap with three quantities: background, the embedding component that does not separate skills; unsaid vocabulary, the gold skill's content a request leaves unsaid; and dilution, the information lost when a skill is encoded into a single vector. They show which part each module narrows and by what mechanism. This reveals that modules narrowing the same part compete for it, while those narrowing different parts complement each other.

cs.IR↗