arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.32564

Estimation of the Cyclopean Eye from Binocular Free Visual Explorations

Abstract

Binocular video-oculography records separate signals for each eye, yet human visual processing and oculomotor control operate relative to a single, virtual cyclopean eye. This study addresses the estimation of the cyclopean eye during binocular free visual exploration, a target-free paradigm widely used for the screening of neurological disorders. Using eye-tracking data collected at 1 kHz from 113 participants across three cohorts (patients with Parkinson's Disease, age-matched healthy controls, and young controls), we compare two different methods: one based on an Independent Component Analysis and another based on Factor Analysis. The extracted cyclopean signals were evaluated on their ability to preserve clinically critical fixation and saccadic events using both velocity-threshold and pixel-dispersion event detectors, and were validated against references via Dynamic Time Warping. Results suggest that the technique based on Factor Analysis guarantees full identifiability across all subjects and achieves low alignment errors, performing comparably to the traditional Version Signal (point-wise mean) while dynamically adapting to inter-eye asymmetry. Furthermore, the second factor in this technique was empirically null across all fitted models, confirming that a single latent factor fully accounts for the shared binocular gaze dynamics. These findings establish Factor Analysis as an identifiable framework for estimating the cyclopean eye in target-free visual exploration protocols.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maria F. Alcala-Durand, J. Camilo Puerta-Acevedo, Julián D. Arias-Londoño, Elisa Luque-Buzo, Francisco J. Grandas-Pérez, Juan I. Godino-Llorente. 2026-10-23. Estimation of the Cyclopean Eye from Binocular Free Visual Explorations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32564

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Detecting absence: A dedicated prediction-error signal emerging in the auditory thalamus

How does the brain know what is out there and what is not? Living organisms cannot rely solely on sensory signals for perception because they are noisy and ambiguous. To form stable percepts, the brain exploits its prior knowledge or beliefs. Current theories explain how perceptual beliefs on the features of the stimuli (e.g., pitch or motion velocity) are updated by feature prediction errors: the mismatch between expected and observed values. How the brain updates beliefs about a stimulus' presence or absence is, however, unclear. Previous work has argued that detecting absence, which relies on the lack of evidence for presence, depends on different mechanisms than the identification of a feature. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the detection of absence relies on a form of prediction error dedicated to the update of beliefs on stimulus occurrence. Since feature prediction error already occurs in the sensory pathway, we hypothesised that this would be similar for absence prediction error. We studied this absence prediction error in the human auditory pathway with fMRI by measuring BOLD responses to absence of stimuli for which the participants held different levels of expectations. Comparing more and less expected responses to absence, we showed that prediction error to absence is represented in the auditory thalamus and cortex. Moreover, while feature prediction error is encoded in the auditory midbrain, absence prediction error was not, implying that absence is processed by a different circuit. These results identify the neural mechanism for the detection of sensory absence. These mechanisms may be disrupted in conditions like psychosis, where the detection of absence is impaired.

q-bio.NC↗

Phase-based Edge Coupling: Modeling Overlapping Functional Architectures and High-Order Edge-to-Edge Interactions in EEG Networks

Network neuroscience has traditionally relied on node-centric approaches, which are inherently limited in capturing the brain's overlapping functional architectures and higher-order edge-to-edge interactions. The emerging edge-centric paradigm addresses this gap by shifting the analytical unit from nodes to edges. However, while edge-centric models have been established for DTI and fMRI, comparable EEG methodologies have yet to be developed. In this study, we proposed a Phase-based Edge-centric Coupling (PEC) algorithm for EEG network modelling, where edge time series are derived from instantaneous phase differences of EEG signals and edge-to-edge coupling is quantified via normalized inner product. Simulation tests demonstrated the robustness of PEC algorithm, achieving high accuracy (<10% relative error) in coupling estimation and discriminative capacity (AUROC>0.7) against spurious coupling.When provided sufficient data length(>=16 cycles), PEC outperformed traditional Phase Node-centric Coupling (PNC) in both individual identifiability and cognitive-state identifiability, enabling superior characterization of stable individual neural signatures and dynamic task-dependent functional configurations. Furthermore, unlike PNC's hard-partitioned modularity, PEC captured highly overlapping yet functionally specialized modular structures and connector hubs, aligning with task-engaged cognitive processes. Applied to dyadic interactions, PEC identified distinct cross-brain modules encoding symmetric and asymmetric neural coordination. These findings establish PEC as a valid and powerful tool for EEG network modelling, providing new insights into the brain's complex, multifunctional organization at both intra-brain and inter-brain networks.

q-bio.NC↗

From Heterogeneity to Function: Enhanced Modular Dynamic Range in Hierarchical Brain Networks

Hierarchical and modular organization defines brain architecture, yet how it supports flexible computation and functional specialization remains unclear. Although dynamic range is a hallmark of efficient information processing, its distribution across modules and hierarchical levels remains largely unexplored. Here, we show that hierarchical-modular networks naturally generate heterogeneous modular dynamics and firing rates, extending regimes of critical-like dynamics with enhanced intrinsic timescales, reflecting critical slowing down, and diverse scaling exponents without fine-tuning near criticality. Intrinsic timescales increase across hierarchical levels, while their dispersion within levels emerges only when connectivity profiles and firing rates are heterogeneous. We introduce modular dynamic range to quantify how individual modules respond to external inputs and show that heterogeneity enhances both global and module-specific sensitivity, with modular intrinsic timescales increasing with dynamic range. Local stimulation reduces dynamic range in homogeneous networks but enhances it in heterogeneous networks relative to global stimulation. Moreover, selectively stimulating intermediate hierarchical levels maximizes both global and modular dynamic range, revealing a principle of functional specialization. In heterogeneous networks, modular dynamic range is more variable and increases even in unstimulated modules, demonstrating distributed computational benefits beyond directly stimulated regions. Together, these findings establish heterogeneity as a mechanism through which hierarchical-modular networks sustain critical-like dynamics, generate hierarchical timescales, and distribute computational sensitivity, providing a basis for functional specialization without fine-tuning to criticality.

q-bio.NC↗