On the Expressiveness of Asynchronous Processes with Nested Session Types

Sjors Wortelboer; Dan Frumin; Jorge A. Pérez

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.32558

On the Expressiveness of Asynchronous Processes with Nested Session Types

Sjors Wortelboer·Dan Frumin·Jorge A. Pérez

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Session types are a type-based approach to correct message-passing programs, where types specify protocols for channels and type checking guarantees communication correctness. Traditional session types express regular protocols only, which leaves out many protocols found in practice. Aiming at overcoming this limitation, Nested Session Types (NSTs) can specify nested recursive protocols. NSTs are known to be characterised by one-counter machines and deterministic context-free languages. In this paper, we study the expressiveness of ASP (Asynchronous Session Processes), the process model associated with NSTs as introduced by Das et al. We prove that AST is Turing complete by giving a correct encoding of two-counter machines into typed processes. Our encoding uses a non-trivial state-aware representation of counters and instructions that is neatly governed by NSTs.

Explore related subjects

cs.PL cs.DC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Sjors Wortelboer, Dan Frumin, Jorge A. Pérez. 2026-10-23. On the Expressiveness of Asynchronous Processes with Nested Session Types. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32558

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

On the Expressive Power of Hook-Indexed State Comprehending State in the React UI Library

React is currently the most popular JavaScript library for front-end web development. It endows UI components with state via the useState construct, through a mechanism that we name hook-indexed state. However, React's implementation of hook-indexed state is both fragile and poorly understood. Programmers frequently experience unexpected behavior, and the benefits of programming in this paradigm are wholly unclear. We define Lambda-React-Hook, a core calculus that captures the essence of hook-indexed state, and give it a type system to statically rule out unexpected behavior. We then translate Lambda-React-Hook into a calculus Lambda-React-Ref based on ML-style references, and prove that this translation preserves typability and semantics, thus showing that hook-indexed state is expressible in terms of standard references. The translation is local and admits a compositional definition, but involves significant code duplication. As well as illuminating the essence of state in React, our observations can inform the design of future reactive programming systems.

cs.PL↗

arXiv2026

Guard Analysis and Safe Erasure Gradual Typing: a Type System for Elixir

We formalize a new type system for Elixir, a dynamically typed functional programming language of growing popularity that runs on the Erlang virtual machine. Our system combines gradual typing with semantic subtyping to enable precise, sound, and practical static type analysis, without requiring any changes to Elixir's compilation pipeline or runtime. Type soundness is ensured by leveraging runtime checks -- both implicit, from the Erlang VM, and explicit, via developer-written guards. Central to our approach are two key innovations: the notion of "strong functions", which can be assigned precise types even when applied to inputs that may fall outside their intended domain; and a fine-grained analysis of guards that enables accurate type refinement for case expressions and guarded function definitions. While type information is erased before execution and not used by the compiler, our "safe erasure" gradual typing strategy maintains soundness and expressiveness without compromising compatibility or performance. This work lays the theoretical foundation for Elixir's new type system, outlines its integration into recent versions of the language, and demonstrates its effectiveness on large-scale industrial codebases.

cs.PL↗

arXiv2026

Structure-Aware Equivalence for Evaluating Autoformalized Statements

Evaluating autoformalized mathematical statements requires determining whether a candidate preserves the mathematical claim intended by a trusted reference. Existing methods approach this problem from complementary directions: reference-free learned evaluators estimate semantic agreement but are not constrained to a formal equivalence relation, while reference-based proof methods typically employ whole-statement logical equivalence to provide formal certificates, which is too coarse for translation fidelity and may identify mathematically unrelated statements. We introduce Structure-Aware Equivalence (SAE), a role-preserving formal equivalence relation between syntactic and whole-statement logical equivalence that allows formally justified reformulations while preserving translation-relevant mathematical structure. We operationalize SAE in the Autoformalization Correctness Evaluator (ACE), which provides certified equivalence or inequivalence judgments and reports Inconclusive otherwise. On ProofNetVerif, a benchmark introduced with BEq+, ACE retains substantial equivalent-case coverage while remaining highly conservative in certifying disputed or inequivalent pairs. On targeted diagnostics, BEq+ accepts 94-96% of unrelated but whole-statement logically equivalent pairs, while Mathesis LeanScorer accepts 42% of localized meaning-changing perturbations; ACE accepts none of either set as equivalent.

cs.PL↗