arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.32455

Delayed Retirement, Intergenerational Transfers, and Fertility

Abstract

Population aging and fertility decline are occurring simultaneously worldwide, straining labor supply and pension systems. China began a gradual delayed-retirement (GDR) reform in 2025, raising statutory retirement ages on different schedules for men, female cadres, and female workers across birth cohorts. To evaluate its effects on older individuals and within the family, we develop a model of older adults' retirement, intergenerational transfers, and adult children's fertility decisions, with parameters estimated via fuzzy regression discontinuity at the pre-2025 statutory retirement ages. Counterfactual simulations show that, for mature reform cohorts, the GDR reform increases older employment and monetary transfers to adult children but reduces grandparental childcare. Because the reduction in childcare outweighs the increase in monetary transfers, fertility and older adults' welfare decline, with particularly large losses among lower-income women. Fully flexible retirement, mandatory partial retirement, and mandatory full-time work do not raise employment without similarly reducing fertility and welfare. Childcare subsidies can offset the declines in fertility and welfare, while restricting eligibility to women or lower-income women requires higher subsidy rates but reduces average fiscal expenditure. These findings suggest that evaluations of retirement policy should consider not only its direct effects on older adults' labor supply, but also its fertility effects through intergenerational transfers; childcare support can help mitigate these negative intergenerational effects of delayed retirement.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yi Fan, Shuangshuang Song, Yewen Yu. 2026-10-23. Delayed Retirement, Intergenerational Transfers, and Fertility. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32455

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

GenAI-Assisted Writing and Academic Performance: Evidence from the Social and Behavioral Sciences

This paper studies how Generative AI (GenAI)-assisted writing is associated with peer-reviewed publication output and journal placement in the social and behavioral sciences. We select lexical markers whose frequency rose sharply after ChatGPT's release in late 2022 and classify authors as GenAI-assisted writers when the share of these markers in their papers' titles and abstracts rises relative to their own pre-release baseline. Using matched author-level panel data and a difference-in-differences design, we estimate a 72% increase in publication output among GenAI-assisted writers relative to matched comparison authors in 2025. Across alternative specifications, the estimates range from roughly 52% to 88%. Mean journal placement based on the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) improves by roughly 1%, but this modest increase is less consistent across different specifications. Within authors' annual publication portfolios, the highest placement improves by 5%, whereas the lowest declines by 3%. However, only the improvement at the top persists once the annual number of publications is held constant. The increase in output is accompanied by an expansion of collaboration networks and a rise in single-authored publications. Productivity gains are largest among early-career researchers and authors from countries linguistically distant from English, groups likely to face greater writing-related barriers to publication. The results suggest that GenAI-assisted writing may lower these barriers and increase researchers' capacity to bring more projects to publication.

econ.GN↗

Short-Run Multi-Outcome Effects of Nightlife Regulation in San Juan

I evaluate San Juan, Puerto Rico's late-night alcohol sales ordinance using a multi-outcome synthetic control that pools economic and public-safety series. I show that a common-weight estimator clarifies mechanisms under low-rank outcome structure. I find economically meaningful reallocations in targeted sectors -- restaurants and bars, gasoline and convenience, and hospitality employment -- while late-night public disorder arrests and violent crime show no clear departures from pre-policy trends. The short post-policy window and small donor pool limit statistical power; joint conformal and permutation tests do not reject the null at conventional thresholds. I therefore emphasize effect magnitudes, temporal persistence, and pre-trend fit over formal significance. Code and diagnostics are available for replication.

econ.GN↗

Execution and Evaluation: Task Content, Labor Demand, and the Evaluator Pipeline

Measures of occupational AI exposure ask whether machines can perform a task, not which function the human supplies. I distinguish execution, producing a first-pass output, from evaluation, judging whether it is correct, and make the distinction measurable by scoring all 19,265 O*NET task statements under fixed rubrics. The execution score is reproducible across model coders and O*NET vintages. In a 200-task random audit it correlates 0.81 with the mean of four blinded human coders. It predicts each held-out coder's peers better than that coder does, though the coders disagree substantially among themselves. It adds only modest power beyond O*NET's evaluation activities. Employment growth is lower in execution-heavy white-collar occupations in every window since 2012; the gradient shows no post-2022 break and lies largely between occupational families. The Eloundou exposure gradient is steeper in 2022--2025 than in the pandemic window, but the design does not establish an AI effect. A near-term seniority test is null. If evaluative judgment is itself produced by execution practice, the supply of evaluators falls only after a cohort lag; that prediction remains untested.

econ.GN↗